» Articles » PMID: 32490023

Clinical Outcomes After Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Using Transosseous Sutures Versus Suture Anchors: A Prospective Nonrandomized Controlled Trial

Overview
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2020 Jun 4
PMID 32490023
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Patellar instability remains a challenging problem for orthopaedic surgeons. Recurrent patellar instability is traditionally treated with medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction using a suture anchor or bone tunnel technique. Although the use of transosseous sutures was recently described for MPFL reconstruction, relevant clinical data have not been reported.

Purpose/hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to compare a new transosseous suture fixation technique with the suture anchor technique for MPFL reconstruction. The hypothesis was that reconstruction with transosseous sutures would show similar clinical results to reconstruction with suture anchors.

Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.

Methods: There were 65 patients with recurrent lateral patellar dislocations from January 2014 to December 2016 who were included in this prospective nonrandomized controlled trial. In total, 31 patients underwent MPFL reconstruction with suture anchors at the patella site (suture anchor group), while the other 34 patients underwent MPFL reconstruction with transosseous sutures (transosseous suture group). The main outcome variable (patellar redislocation) was recorded at follow-up (range, 25-60 months). The International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Kujala score, range of motion, congruence angle, patellar tilt, redislocation rate, and complications were collected preoperatively and/or postoperatively.

Results: No recurrent dislocations or other complications were observed in any of the patients. No significant differences were found at follow-up between the suture anchor and transosseous suture groups for subjective IKDC score, Kujala score, congruence angle, patellar tilt, redislocation rate, or range of motion.

Conclusion: This short-term study showed that after MPFL reconstruction (suture anchors or transosseous sutures), patellar stability could be restored. With the numbers available, no significant differences in outcome scores were observed between patients in the transosseous suture and suture anchor groups.

Citing Articles

Biomechanical Evaluation and Comparative Analysis of Functional Scores in Suture Anchor Versus Transosseous Tunnel Patellar Tendon Repair Techniques in Adult Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Elnewishy A, Elsenosy A, Teama H, Salem M Cureus. 2024; 16(11):e73495.

PMID: 39677232 PMC: 11638015. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.73495.


Surgical techniques for medial Patellofemoral ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of level I and II studies.

Kahlon H, Vivekanantha P, Blackman B, Cohen D, McKechnie T, Park L Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023; 31(10):4368-4378.

PMID: 37347281 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-023-07494-w.


Stiffness and Instability After MPFL Reconstruction Using a Fluoroscopic Versus Open Technique to Localize the Femoral Attachment Site: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Heindel K, Smoak J, Kocan J, Cossell C, Haider M, Levy B Orthop J Sports Med. 2023; 11(6):23259671221148482.

PMID: 37342554 PMC: 10278418. DOI: 10.1177/23259671221148482.


Protocols of rehabilitation and return to sport, and clinical outcomes after medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction with and without tibial tuberosity osteotomy: a systematic review.

Koshino Y, Taniguchi S, Kobayashi T, Samukawa M, Inoue M Int Orthop. 2022; 46(11):2517-2528.

PMID: 35701590 DOI: 10.1007/s00264-022-05480-4.


Biomechanical Comparison of 2 Patellar Fixation Techniques in Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction: Transosseous Sutures vs Suture Anchors.

Zhao X, Zhang H Orthop J Sports Med. 2021; 9(10):23259671211041404.

PMID: 34692878 PMC: 8529315. DOI: 10.1177/23259671211041404.


References
1.
Damasena I, Blythe M, Wysocki D, Kelly D, Annear P . Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Combined With Distal Realignment for Recurrent Dislocations of the Patella: 5-Year Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Sports Med. 2017; 45(2):369-376. DOI: 10.1177/0363546516666352. View

2.
Mikashima Y, Kimura M, Kobayashi Y, Miyawaki M, Tomatsu T . Clinical results of isolated reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament for recurrent dislocation and subluxation of the patella. Acta Orthop Belg. 2006; 72(1):65-71. View

3.
Gobbi R, Demange M, Avila L, Araujo Filho J, Moreno R, Gutierrez M . Patellar tracking after isolated medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction: dynamic evaluation using computed tomography. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016; 25(10):3197-3205. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-016-4284-x. View

4.
Schiphouwer L, Rood A, Tigchelaar S, Koeter S . Complications of medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction using two transverse patellar tunnels. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016; 25(1):245-250. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-016-4245-4. View

5.
Schottle P, Hensler D, Imhoff A . Anatomical double-bundle MPFL reconstruction with an aperture fixation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009; 18(2):147-51. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-009-0868-z. View