» Articles » PMID: 32485982

Serodynamic Analysis of the Piglets Born from Sows Vaccinated with Modified Live Vaccine or E2 Subunit Vaccine for Classical Swine Fever

Overview
Journal Pathogens
Date 2020 Jun 4
PMID 32485982
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Classical swine fever (CSF) caused by the CSF virus (CSFV) is one of the most important swine diseases, resulting in huge economic losses to the pig industry worldwide. Systematic vaccination is one of the most effective strategies for the prevention and control of this disease. Two main CSFV vaccines, the modified live vaccine (MLV) and the subunit E2 vaccine, are recommended. In Taiwan, CSF cases have not been reported since 2006, although systemic vaccination has been practiced for 70 years. Here, we examined the sero-dynamics of the piglets born from sows that received either the CSFV MLV or the E2 vaccine and investigated in the field the correlation between the porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) loads and levels of CSFV antibody. A total of 1398 serum samples from 42 PRRSV-positive farms were evaluated to determine the PRRSV loads by real-time PCR and to detect CSFV antibody levels by commercial ELISA. Upon comparing the two sow vaccination protocols (CSFV MLV vaccination at 4 weeks post-farrowing versus E2 vaccination at 4-5 weeks pre-farrowing), the lowest levels of CSFV antibody were found in piglets at 5-8 and 9-12 weeks of age for the MLV and E2 groups, respectively. Meanwhile, the appropriate time window for CSFV vaccination of offspring was at 5-8 and 9-12 weeks of age in the MLV and E2 groups, respectively. There was a very highly significant negative correlation between the PRRSV load and the level of CSFV antibody in the CSFV MLV vaccination group ( < 0.0001). The PRRSV detection rate in the pigs from the MLV group (27.78%) was significantly higher than that in pigs from the E2 group (21.32%) ( = 0.011). In addition, there was a significant difference ( = 0.019) in the PRRSV detection rate at 5-8 weeks of age between the MLV (42.15%) and E2 groups (29.79%). Our findings indicate that the vaccination of CSFV MLV in piglets during the PRRSV susceptibility period at 5-8 weeks of age may be overloading the piglet's immune system and should be a critical concern for industrial pork production in the field.

Citing Articles

Development of a dual immunochromatographic test strip to detect E2 and E antibodies against classical swine fever.

Huynh L, Sohn E, Park Y, Kim J, Shimoda T, Hiono T Front Microbiol. 2024; 15:1383976.

PMID: 38666258 PMC: 11043574. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1383976.


Transboundary Animal Diseases, an Overview of 17 Diseases with Potential for Global Spread and Serious Consequences.

Clemmons E, Alfson K, Dutton 3rd J Animals (Basel). 2021; 11(7).

PMID: 34359167 PMC: 8300273. DOI: 10.3390/ani11072039.


Correlation of Neutralizing Antibodies (NAbs) between Sows and Piglets and Evaluation of Protectability Associated with Maternally Derived NAbs in Pigs against Circulating Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus (PRRSV) under Field....

Hsueh F, Wang S, Lin W, Lin C, Tsai C, Huang C Vaccines (Basel). 2021; 9(5).

PMID: 33919161 PMC: 8143086. DOI: 10.3390/vaccines9050414.


Evaluation of classical swine fever E2 (CSF-E2) subunit vaccine efficacy in the prevention of virus transmission and impact of maternal derived antibody interference in field farm applications.

Chen J, Wu C, Chen Z, Liao C, Deng M, Chia M Porcine Health Manag. 2021; 7(1):9.

PMID: 33431028 PMC: 7798205. DOI: 10.1186/s40813-020-00188-6.


Classical Swine Fever: A Truly Classical Swine Disease.

Wang F, Chang C Pathogens. 2020; 9(9).

PMID: 32927731 PMC: 7560091. DOI: 10.3390/pathogens9090745.

References
1.
Floegel-Niesmann G . Classical swine fever (CSF) marker vaccine. Trial III. Evaluation of discriminatory ELISAs. Vet Microbiol. 2001; 83(2):121-36. DOI: 10.1016/s0378-1135(01)00411-4. View

2.
Choe S, Le V, Shin J, Kim J, Kim K, Song S . Pathogenicity and Genetic Characterization of Vietnamese Classical Swine Fever Virus: 2014-2018. Pathogens. 2020; 9(3). PMC: 7157220. DOI: 10.3390/pathogens9030169. View

3.
Suradhat S, Thanawongnuwech R, Poovorawan Y . Upregulation of IL-10 gene expression in porcine peripheral blood mononuclear cells by porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus. J Gen Virol. 2003; 84(Pt 2):453-459. DOI: 10.1099/vir.0.18698-0. View

4.
Li H, Yang H . Infection of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus suppresses the antibody response to classical swine fever virus vaccination. Vet Microbiol. 2003; 95(4):295-301. DOI: 10.1016/s0378-1135(03)00158-5. View

5.
Blome S, Staubach C, Henke J, Carlson J, Beer M . Classical Swine Fever-An Updated Review. Viruses. 2017; 9(4). PMC: 5408692. DOI: 10.3390/v9040086. View