Switching from Omalizumab to Mepolizumab: Real-life Experience from Southern Italy
Overview
Pulmonary Medicine
Authors
Affiliations
Background: Current availability of several biologic treatments for severe asthma makes it possible to choose the most appropriate for each patient. Sometimes a good percentage of patients with severe asthma may be eligible for biologics that target either the allergic phenotype or the eosinophilic one, but not all respond to that selected as first choice. The aim of our real-life study was to assess whether, for patients with severe eosinophilic allergic asthma, not previously controlled by the anti-IgE omalizumab, the shift to another biologic targeting interleukin-5, such as mepolizumab, may represent a good therapeutic choice.
Methods: A total of 41 consecutive patients with severe, persistent allergic, eosinophilic asthma, uncontrolled despite treatment with omalizumab, were enrolled in seven certified Clinical Respiratory Units of Southern Italy (Catania, Catanzaro, Foggia, Bari, Palermo, and two University Respiratory Units of Naples) and shifted to mepolizumab without a wash-out period. Data at baseline, after at least 12 months of therapy with omalizumab, and after at least 12 months of treatment with mepolizumab were collected.
Results: After at least 12 months of therapy with mepolizumab, patients experienced a significant decrease in the number of exacerbations/year (5.8 ± 1.8 0.7 ± 0.9, < 0.0001), an increment of asthma control test score (12 ± 2.7 21.9 ± 2.7, < 0.0001), an increase in pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s (1.56 ± 0.45 l 1.86 ± 0.52 l, < 0.0001), and a reduction of blood eosinophils (584 ± 196 cells/µl 82 ± 56 cells/µl, < 0.0001). The percentage of patients who were dependent on corticosteroids significantly decreased from 46% at baseline to 5% during treatment with mepolizumab.
Conclusion: Results of our real-life multicentric experience confirms that the shift to mepolizumab could be a good therapeutic strategy in severe eosinophilic allergic asthma not previously controlled by omalizumab.
Monoclonal Antibody Switching in Biologic Treatment of Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps.
Habenbacher M, Moser U, Hadl O, Kiss P, Holzmeister C, Pock J J Clin Med. 2024; 13(22).
PMID: 39598027 PMC: 11595206. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13226883.
Goto A, Harada S, Sasano H, Sandhu Y, Tanabe Y, Abe S J Asthma Allergy. 2024; 17:1173-1186.
PMID: 39558969 PMC: 11572441. DOI: 10.2147/JAA.S423256.
Advancing Care in Severe Asthma: The Art of Switching Biologics.
Dragonieri S, Portacci A, Quaranta V, Carpagnano G Adv Respir Med. 2024; 92(2):110-122.
PMID: 38525773 PMC: 10961683. DOI: 10.3390/arm92020014.
Personalized Medicine in Severe Asthma: From Biomarkers to Biologics.
Chen C, Wu K, Guo B, Lin W, Chang Y, Wei C Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(1).
PMID: 38203353 PMC: 10778979. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25010182.
[Unmet Needs in Severe Allergic Asthma].
Delgado J, Navarro A, Alvarez-Gutierrez F, Cisneros C, Dominguez-Ortega J Open Respir Arch. 2023; 5(4):100282.
PMID: 38053757 PMC: 10694599. DOI: 10.1016/j.opresp.2023.100282.