» Articles » PMID: 32481256

The Computation of Case Fatality Rate for Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) Based on Bayes Theorem: An Observational Study

Overview
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2020 Jun 3
PMID 32481256
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: When a new disease such starts to spread, the commonly asked questions are how deadly is it? and how many people are likely to die of this outbreak? The World Health Organization (WHO) announced in a press conference on January 29, 2020 that the death rate of COVID-19 was 2% on the case fatality rate (CFR). It was underestimated assuming no lag days from symptom onset to deaths while many CFR formulas have been proposed, the estimation on Bays theorem is worthy of interpretation. Hence, it is hypothesized that the over-loaded burdens of treating patients and capacities to contain the outbreak (LSBHRS) may increase the CFR.

Methods: We downloaded COVID-19 outbreak numbers from January 21 to February 14, 2020, in countries/regions on a daily basis from Github that contains information on confirmed cases in >30 Chinese locations and other countries/regions. The pros and cons were compared among the 5 formula of CFR, including [A] deaths/confirmed; [B] deaths/(deaths + recovered); [C] deaths/(cases x days ago); [D] Bayes estimation based on [A] and the outbreak (LSBHRS) in each country/region; and [E] Bayes estimation based on [C] deaths/(cases x days ago). The coefficients of variance (CV = the ratio of the standard deviation to the mean) were applied to measure the relative variability for each CFR. A dashboard was developed for daily display of the CFR across each region.

Results: The Bayes based on (A)[D] has the lowest CV (=0.10) followed by the deaths/confirmed (=0.11) [A], deaths/(deaths + recoveries) (=0.42) [B], Bayes based on (C) (=0.49) [E], and deaths/(cases x days ago) (=0.59) [C]. All final CFRs will be equal using the formula (from, A to E). A dashboard was developed for the daily reporting of the CFR. The CFR (3.7%) greater than the prior CFR of 2.2% was evident in LSBHRS, increasing the CFR. A dashboard was created to present the CFRs on COVID-19.

Conclusion: We suggest examining both trends of the Bayes based on both deaths/(cases 7 days ago) and deaths/confirmed cases as a reference to the final CFR. An app developed for displaying the provisional CFR with the 2 CFR trends can improve the underestimated CFR reported by WHO and media.

Citing Articles

The 95% control lines on both confirmed cases and days of infection with COVID-19 were applied to compare the impact on public health between 2020 and 2021 using the hT-index.

Chuang H, Kan W, Chien T, Tsai C Medicine (Baltimore). 2023; 102(20):e33570.

PMID: 37335720 PMC: 10193847. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000033570.


Characteristics and specifications of dashboards developed for the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review.

Khodaveisi T, Dehdarirad H, Bouraghi H, Mohammadpour A, Sajadi F, Hosseiniravandi M Z Gesundh Wiss. 2023; :1-22.

PMID: 36747505 PMC: 9894516. DOI: 10.1007/s10389-023-01838-z.


The use of the time-to-event index (Tevent) to compare the negative impact of COVID-19 on public health among continents/regions in 2020 and 2021: An observational study.

Chuang H, Wu H, Chien T, Chou W, Chen S Medicine (Baltimore). 2023; 101(49):e30249.

PMID: 36626433 PMC: 9750618. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030249.


COVID-19 Vaccination Knowledge, Perception, and Reason for Adherence and nonadherence Among Nursing Students in Egypt.

Abdelkader F, Alkubati S, Alsabri M, McClean C, Albagawi B, Alsaqri S SAGE Open Nurs. 2022; 8:23779608221141234.

PMID: 36467311 PMC: 9709169. DOI: 10.1177/23779608221141234.


Comparison of prediction accuracies between two mathematical models for the assessment of COVID-19 damage at the early stage and throughout 2020.

Chuang H, Chien T, Chou W, Wang C, Tsai K Medicine (Baltimore). 2022; 101(32):e29718.

PMID: 35960054 PMC: 9370249. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029718.