» Articles » PMID: 32479377

Cortical and Subcortical Response to the Anticipation of Reward in High and Average/low Risk-taking Adolescents

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialties Neurology
Psychiatry
Date 2020 Jun 2
PMID 32479377
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Since the first neurodevelopmental models that sought to explain the influx of risky behaviors during adolescence were proposed, there have been a number of revisions, variations and criticisms. Despite providing a strong multi-disciplinary heuristic to explain the development of risk behavior, extant models have not yet reliably isolated neural systems that underlie risk behaviors in adolescence. To address this gap, we screened 2017 adolescents from an ongoing longitudinal study that assessed 15-health risk behaviors, targeting 104 adolescents (Age Range: 17-to-21.4), characterized as high-or-average/low risk-taking. Participants completed the Monetary Incentive Delay (MID) fMRI task, examining reward anticipation to "big win" versus "neutral". We examined neural response variation associated with both baseline and longitudinal (multi-wave) risk classifications. Analyses included examination of a priori regions of interest (ROIs); and exploratory non-parametric, whole-brain analyses. Hypothesis-driven ROI analysis revealed no significant differences between high- and average/low-risk profiles using either baseline or multi-wave classification. Results of whole-brain analyses differed according to whether risk assessment was based on baseline or multi-wave data. Despite significant mean-level task activation, these results do not generalize prior neural substrates implicated in reward anticipation and adolescent risk-taking. Further, these data indicate that whole-brain differences may depend on how risk-behavior profiles are defined.

Citing Articles

The path from mood symptoms to substance use: A longitudinal examination in individuals with and at risk for bipolar spectrum disorders.

Smith L, Bishop O, Nusslock R, Alloy L J Affect Disord. 2024; 360:33-41.

PMID: 38815758 PMC: 11185173. DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.05.146.


A multi-sample evaluation of the measurement structure and function of the modified monetary incentive delay task in adolescents.

Demidenko M, Mumford J, Ram N, Poldrack R Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2023; 65:101337.

PMID: 38160517 PMC: 10801229. DOI: 10.1016/j.dcn.2023.101337.


Identification of a Composite Latent Dimension of Reward and Impulsivity Across Clinical, Behavioral, and Neurobiological Domains Among Youth.

Kohler R, Lichenstein S, Cheng A, Holmes A, Bzdok D, Pearlson G Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2023; 9(4):407-416.

PMID: 38052266 PMC: 11149944. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2023.11.008.


A Meta-Analysis of Neural Correlates of Reward Anticipation in Individuals at Clinical Risk for Schizophrenia.

Zeng J, Yan J, You L, Liao T, Luo Y, Cheng B Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2023; 26(4):280-293.

PMID: 36893068 PMC: 10109154. DOI: 10.1093/ijnp/pyad009.


Neural heterogeneity underlying late adolescent motivational processing is linked to individual differences in behavioral sensation seeking.

Demidenko M, Huntley E, Weigard A, Keating D, Beltz A J Neurosci Res. 2022; 100(3):762-779.

PMID: 35043448 PMC: 8978150. DOI: 10.1002/jnr.25005.


References
1.
Lamm C, Benson B, Guyer A, Perez-Edgar K, Fox N, Pine D . Longitudinal study of striatal activation to reward and loss anticipation from mid-adolescence into late adolescence/early adulthood. Brain Cogn. 2014; 89:51-60. PMC: 4113563. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2013.12.003. View

2.
Telzer E, Fuligni A, Lieberman M, Miernicki M, Galvan A . The quality of adolescents' peer relationships modulates neural sensitivity to risk taking. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2014; 10(3):389-98. PMC: 4350483. DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsu064. View

3.
Demidenko M, Weigard A, Ganesan K, Jang H, Jahn A, Huntley E . Interactions between methodological and interindividual variability: How Monetary Incentive Delay (MID) task contrast maps vary and impact associations with behavior. Brain Behav. 2021; 11(5):e02093. PMC: 8119872. DOI: 10.1002/brb3.2093. View

4.
Vul E, Harris C, Winkielman P, Pashler H . Puzzlingly High Correlations in fMRI Studies of Emotion, Personality, and Social Cognition. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015; 4(3):274-90. DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01125.x. View

5.
Woo C, Chang L, Lindquist M, Wager T . Building better biomarkers: brain models in translational neuroimaging. Nat Neurosci. 2017; 20(3):365-377. PMC: 5988350. DOI: 10.1038/nn.4478. View