The Effect of Interbrain Synchronization in Gesture Observation: A FNIRS Study

Overview

Journal Brain Behav

Specialty Psychology

Date 2020 May 30

PMID 32469153

Citations 5

Authors

Giulia Fronda

Michela Balconi

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Introduction: Gestures characterize individuals' nonverbal communicative exchanges, taking on different functions. Several types of research in the neuroscientific field have been interested in the investigation of the neural correlates underlying the observation and implementation of different gestures categories. In particular, different studies have focused on the neural correlates underlying gestures observation, emphasizing the presence of mirroring mechanisms in specific brain areas, which appear to be involved in gesture observation and planning mechanisms.

Materials And Methods: Specifically, the present study aimed to investigate the neural mechanisms, through the use of functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS), underlying the observation of affective, social, and informative gestures with positive and negative valence in individuals' dyads composed by encoder and decoder. The variations of oxygenated (O2Hb) and deoxygenated (HHb) hemoglobin concentrations of both individuals were collected simultaneously through the use of hyperscanning paradigm, allowing the recording of brain responsiveness and interbrain connectivity.

Results: The results showed a different brain activation and an increase of interbrain connectivity according to the type of gestures observed, with a significant increase of O2Hb brain responsiveness and interbrain connectivity and a decrease of HHb brain responsiveness for affective gestures in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and for social gestures in the superior frontal gyrus (SFG). Furthermore, concerning the valence of the observed gestures, an increase of O2Hb brain activity and interbrain connectivity was observed in the left DLPFC for positive affective gestures compared to negative ones.

Conclusion: In conclusion, the present study showed different brain responses underlying the observation of different types of positive and negative gestures. Moreover, interbrain connectivity calculation allowed us to underline the presence of mirroring mechanisms involved in gesture-specific frontal regions during gestures observation and action planning.

Citing Articles

Inter-brain neural mechanism and influencing factors underlying different cooperative behaviors: a hyperscanning study.

Liu Q, Cui H, Huang B, Huang Y, Sun H, Ru X Brain Struct Funct. 2023; 229(1):75-95.

PMID: 37899406 DOI: 10.1007/s00429-023-02700-4.

Pseudo-mutual gazing enhances interbrain synchrony during remote joint attention tasking.

Chuang C, Hsu H Brain Behav. 2023; 13(10):e3181.

PMID: 37496332 PMC: 10570487. DOI: 10.1002/brb3.3181.

Bidirectional understanding and cooperation: interbrain neural synchronization during social navigation.

Zhou S, Yang H, Liu T, Yang H Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2023; 18(1).

PMID: 37261919 PMC: 10306364. DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsad031.

Intra-Brain Connectivity vs. Inter-Brain Connectivity in Gestures Reproduction: What Relationship?.

Balconi M, Fronda G Brain Sci. 2021; 11(5).

PMID: 33947101 PMC: 8145238. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci11050577.

The effect of interbrain synchronization in gesture observation: A fNIRS study.

Fronda G, Balconi M Brain Behav. 2020; 10(7):e01663.

PMID: 32469153 PMC: 7375069. DOI: 10.1002/brb3.1663.

References

Balconi M, Pezard L, Nandrino J, Vanutelli M . Two is better than one: The effects of strategic cooperation on intra- and inter-brain connectivity by fNIRS. PLoS One. 2017; 12(11):e0187652. PMC: 5690583. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187652. View

di Pellegrino G, Fadiga L, Fogassi L, Gallese V, Rizzolatti G . Understanding motor events: a neurophysiological study. Exp Brain Res. 1992; 91(1):176-80. DOI: 10.1007/BF00230027. View

Heeger D, Ress D . What does fMRI tell us about neuronal activity?. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002; 3(2):142-51. DOI: 10.1038/nrn730. View

Nakamura A, Maess B, Knosche T, Gunter T, Bach P, Friederici A . Cooperation of different neuronal systems during hand sign recognition. Neuroimage. 2004; 23(1):25-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.04.034. View

Mufson E, Mesulam M . Insula of the old world monkey. II: Afferent cortical input and comments on the claustrum. J Comp Neurol. 1982; 212(1):23-37. DOI: 10.1002/cne.902120103. View

Holle H, Gunter T, Ruschemeyer S, Hennenlotter A, Iacoboni M . Neural correlates of the processing of co-speech gestures. Neuroimage. 2007; 39(4):2010-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.10.055. View

Kalbe E, Schlegel M, Sack A, Nowak D, Dafotakis M, Bangard C . Dissociating cognitive from affective theory of mind: a TMS study. Cortex. 2009; 46(6):769-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2009.07.010. View

Molenberghs P, Cunnington R, Mattingley J . Brain regions with mirror properties: a meta-analysis of 125 human fMRI studies. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2011; 36(1):341-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.07.004. View

Harmon-Jones E . Early Career Award. Clarifying the emotive functions of asymmetrical frontal cortical activity. Psychophysiology. 2004; 40(6):838-48. DOI: 10.1111/1469-8986.00121. View

10.

Lepage J, Theoret H . EEG evidence for the presence of an action observation-execution matching system in children. Eur J Neurosci. 2006; 23(9):2505-10. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2006.04769.x. View

11.

Rizzolatti G, Fogassi L, Gallese V . Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001; 2(9):661-70. DOI: 10.1038/35090060. View

12.

Shima K, Tanji J . Neuronal activity in the supplementary and presupplementary motor areas for temporal organization of multiple movements. J Neurophysiol. 2000; 84(4):2148-60. DOI: 10.1152/jn.2000.84.4.2148. View

13.

Kong A, Law S, Kwan C, Lai C, Lam V . A Coding System with Independent Annotations of Gesture Forms and Functions during Verbal Communication: Development of a Database of Speech and GEsture (DoSaGE). J Nonverbal Behav. 2015; 39(1):93-111. PMC: 4319117. DOI: 10.1007/s10919-014-0200-6. View

14.

Blair R, Morris J, Frith C, Perrett D, Dolan R . Dissociable neural responses to facial expressions of sadness and anger. Brain. 1999; 122 ( Pt 5):883-93. DOI: 10.1093/brain/122.5.883. View

15.

Balconi M, Mazza G . Lateralisation effect in comprehension of emotional facial expression: a comparison between EEG alpha band power and behavioural inhibition (BIS) and activation (BAS) systems. Laterality. 2009; 15(3):361-84. DOI: 10.1080/13576500902886056. View

16.

Lui F, Buccino G, Duzzi D, Benuzzi F, Crisi G, Baraldi P . Neural substrates for observing and imagining non-object-directed actions. Soc Neurosci. 2008; 3(3-4):261-75. DOI: 10.1080/17470910701458551. View

17.

Bates E, Dick F . Language, gesture, and the developing brain. Dev Psychobiol. 2002; 40(3):293-310. DOI: 10.1002/dev.10034. View

18.

Crivelli D, Sabogal Rueda M, Balconi M . Linguistic and motor representations of everyday complex actions: an fNIRS investigation. Brain Struct Funct. 2018; 223(6):2989-2997. DOI: 10.1007/s00429-018-1646-9. View

19.

Crivelli D, Balconi M . The Agent Brain: A Review of Non-invasive Brain Stimulation Studies on Sensing Agency. Front Behav Neurosci. 2017; 11:229. PMC: 5701922. DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00229. View

20.

Liotti M, Mayberg H . The role of functional neuroimaging in the neuropsychology of depression. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2001; 23(1):121-36. DOI: 10.1076/jcen.23.1.121.1223. View