» Articles » PMID: 32466744

Sedation-related Complications During Anesthesiologist-administered Sedation for Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: a Prospective Study

Overview
Journal BMC Anesthesiol
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Anesthesiology
Date 2020 May 30
PMID 32466744
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) require adequate sedation or general anesthesia. To date, there is lack of consensus regarding who should administer sedation in these patients. Several studies have investigated the safety and efficacy of non-anesthesiologist-administered sedation for ERCP; however, data regarding anesthesiologist-administered sedation remain limited. This prospective single-center study investigated the safety and efficacy of anesthesiologist-administered sedation and the rate of successful performed ERCP procedures.

Methods: The study included 200 patients who underwent ERCP following anesthesiologist-administered sedation with propofol and remifentanil. Procedural data, oxygen saturation, systolic blood pressure (SBP), heart rate, recovery score, patient and endoscopist satisfaction, as well as 30-day mortality and morbidity data were analyzed.

Results: Sedation-related complications occurred in 36 of 200 patients (18%) and included hypotension (SBP < 90 mmHg) and hypoxemia (O saturation < 90%) in 18 patients (9%) each. Most events were minor and did not necessitate discontinuation of the procedure. However, ERCP was terminated in 2 patients (1%) secondary to sedation-related complications. Successful cannulation was performed in all patients. The mean duration of the examination was 25 ± 16 min. Mean recovery time was 14 ± 10 min, and high post-procedural satisfaction was observed in both, patients (mean visual analogue scale [VAS] 9.6 ± 0.8) and endoscopists (mean VAS 9.3 ± 1.3).

Conclusion: This study suggests that anesthesiologist-administered sedation is safe in patients undergoing ERCP and is associated with a high rate of successful ERCP, shorter procedure time, and more rapid post-anesthesia recovery, with high patient and endoscopist satisfaction.

Citing Articles

Patient satisfaction and safety in the administration of sedation by nursing staff in the digestive endoscopy service: a cross-sectional study.

Hidalgo-Cabanillas M, Laredo-Aguilera J, Cobo-Cuenca A, Molina-Madueno R, Santacruz-Salas E, Rodriguez-Munoz P BMC Nurs. 2024; 23(1):953.

PMID: 39731089 PMC: 11681753. DOI: 10.1186/s12912-024-02644-y.


Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Anesthetic and Sedative Regimens for Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: A Network Meta-Analysis.

Liu Y, Xiao J, Chen T, Shi D, Qiao Y, Liao X Dig Dis. 2024; 43(1):84-95.

PMID: 39536718 PMC: 11817864. DOI: 10.1159/000542380.


Sedative effects of propofol and risk factors for excessive sedation in the endoscopic treatment of biliary and pancreatic diseases.

Maruki Y, Hijioka S, Yagi S, Takasaki T, Chatto M, Fukuda S DEN Open. 2024; 5(1):e417.

PMID: 39228861 PMC: 11369203. DOI: 10.1002/deo2.417.


Antegrade balloon dilatation of the duodenal papilla during laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in patients with acute choledocholithiasis: a case control matched study.

Gloor S, Minder S, Schnell B, Prevost G, Wiest R, Candinas D Surg Endosc. 2024; 38(7):3810-3818.

PMID: 38811428 PMC: 11219417. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-10909-5.


UK ERCP sedation practices, patient comfort and endoscopist characteristics: National Endoscopy Database (NED) analysis on behalf of the JAG and BSG.

Beaton D, Rutter M, Sharp L, Oppong K, Awadelkarim B, Everett S Frontline Gastroenterol. 2023; 14(5):384-391.

PMID: 37581181 PMC: 10423606. DOI: 10.1136/flgastro-2023-102424.


References
1.
Buxbaum J, Roth N, Motamedi N, Lee T, Leonor P, Salem M . Anesthetist-Directed Sedation Favors Success of Advanced Endoscopic Procedures. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016; 112(2):290-296. DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2016.285. View

2.
Schilling D, Rosenbaum A, Schweizer S, Richter H, Rumstadt B . Sedation with propofol for interventional endoscopy by trained nurses in high-risk octogenarians: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Endoscopy. 2009; 41(4):295-8. DOI: 10.1055/s-0028-1119671. View

3.
Riphaus A, Stergiou N, Wehrmann T . Sedation with propofol for routine ERCP in high-risk octogenarians: a randomized, controlled study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005; 100(9):1957-63. DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.41672.x. View

4.
Talukdar R . Complications of ERCP. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2016; 30(5):793-805. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpg.2016.10.007. View

5.
Jung M, Hofmann C, Kiesslich R, Brackertz A . Improved sedation in diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: propofol is an alternative to midazolam. Endoscopy. 2000; 32(3):233-8. DOI: 10.1055/s-2000-96. View