» Articles » PMID: 32463293

Focal Nodular Marrow Hyperplasia: Imaging Features of 53 Cases

Overview
Journal Br J Radiol
Specialty Radiology
Date 2020 May 29
PMID 32463293
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To describe the characteristic imaging features of focal nodular marrow hyperplasia (FNMH).

Methods And Materials: Retrospective review of all patients with a diagnosis of FNMH between January 2007 and September 2019.

Results: The study included 53 patients, 7 males and 46 females with a mean age of 58 years (range 12-95 years). All had MRI with conventional spin echo sequences showing a poorly defined round/oval lesion with mild W iso/hyperintensity compared to skeletal muscle, low W turbo spin echo (TSE) signal intensity (SI) compared to marrow fat and variable SI on STIR, but never associated with reactive marrow oedema. All 53 patients had follow-up MRI, with all lesions remaining stable or partially resolving. In-phase (IP) and out-of-phase (OP) chemical shift imaging (CSI) was obtained in 31 of these, with 28 (90.3%) showing >20% SI drop on the OP sequence, while 3 (9.7%) demonstrated <20% SI drop. CT was available in 26 cases, 17 (65.4%) showing mild medullary sclerosis. Single-photon emission computed tomography CT (SPECT-CT) was available in four cases and Flourodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography CT (FDG PET-CT) in 2, all showing increased uptake. Focal uptake was also seen in three of eight patients who had undergone whole body bone scintigraphy. Only one lesion was biopsied, confirming FNMH.

Conclusion: The imaging appearances of FNMH have been described on various modalities, particularly MRI with emphasis on the role of IP and OP CSI typically demonstrating >20% SI reduction. FNMH should be recognised and treated as a 'do not touch' lesion which does not require biopsy or prolonged follow-up.

Advances In Knowledge: We describe and clarify the imaging characteristics of FNMH on MRI, including CSI, CT and various nuclear medicine modalities. An imaging algorithm is suggested for allowing a non-invasive diagnosis.

Citing Articles

[Imaging Findings of Spinal Metastases with Differential Diagnosis: Focusing on Solitary Spinal Lesion in Older Patients].

Park S, Yoon M, Lee M, Lee S, Chung H J Korean Soc Radiol. 2024; 85(1):77-94.

PMID: 38362381 PMC: 10864150. DOI: 10.3348/jksr.2023.0156.


In-phase and opposed-phase Dixon chemical shift imaging for the assessment of skeletal marrow lesions: comparison of measurements from longitudinal sequences to those from axial sequences.

Saifuddin A, Ali M, Santiago R, Pressney I Br J Radiol. 2024; 97(1156):828-833.

PMID: 38321150 PMC: 11027321. DOI: 10.1093/bjr/tqae031.


Evaluation of Three Imaging Methods to Quantify Key Events in Pelvic Bone Metastasis.

Lee H, Ahn T, Hwang K, Lee S Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(1).

PMID: 38201641 PMC: 10778360. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16010214.


Quantitative biomarkers for distinguishing bone metastasis and benign bone marrow lesions using turbo spin echo T1- and T2-weighted Dixon imaging at 3.0 T.

Ogiwara S, Fukuda T, Yonenaga T, Ogihara A, Ojiri H Eur J Radiol Open. 2023; 11:100541.

PMID: 38090023 PMC: 10711189. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejro.2023.100541.


Imaging of metastatic epidural spinal cord compression.

Bai J, Grant K, Hussien A, Kawakyu-OConnor D Front Radiol. 2023; 2:962797.

PMID: 37492671 PMC: 10365281. DOI: 10.3389/fradi.2022.962797.


References
1.
Schweitzer M, Levine C, Mitchell D, Gannon F, Gomella L . Bull's-eyes and halos: useful MR discriminators of osseous metastases. Radiology. 1993; 188(1):249-52. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.188.1.8511306. View

2.
van Vucht N, Santiago R, Lottmann B, Pressney I, Harder D, Sheikh A . The Dixon technique for MRI of the bone marrow. Skeletal Radiol. 2019; 48(12):1861-1874. DOI: 10.1007/s00256-019-03271-4. View

3.
Hwang S, Panicek D . Magnetic resonance imaging of bone marrow in oncology, Part 1. Skeletal Radiol. 2007; 36(10):913-20. DOI: 10.1007/s00256-007-0309-3. View

4.
Zhao J, Krug R, Xu D, Lu Y, Link T . MRI of the spine: image quality and normal-neoplastic bone marrow contrast at 3 T versus 1.5 T. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009; 192(4):873-80. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.08.1750. View

5.
Carroll K, Feller J, Tirman P . Useful internal standards for distinguishing infiltrative marrow pathology from hematopoietic marrow at MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1997; 7(2):394-8. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.1880070224. View