» Articles » PMID: 32461229

Clinical Improvement Within 24 Hours from Mechanical Thrombectomy As a Predictor of Long-term Functional Outcome in a Multicenter Population-based Cohort of Patients with Ischemic Stroke

Abstract

Background: Single-center studies have suggested that the early clinical course after mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in patients with ischemic stroke is a clinical predictor of long-term outcome.

Objective: To analyze the prognostic value of clinical improvement within 24 hours in a population-based multicenter cohort.

Methods: From a total of 3792 patients with acute ischemic stroke in Catalonia (CICAT registry), 1951 patients were treated with MT. The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score within 24 hours, and follow-up was available in 1666 patients. Percentage variation in the NIHSS score was calculated in relation to a baseline assessment. Good outcome was defined as a modified Rankin Scale score ≤2 at 90 days. Predictive values of clinical improvement and adjusted OR to predict good outcomes were assessed in the whole cohort and the subgroup of patients with posterior circulation stroke (n=166).

Results: Good outcome was achieved in 656/1666 patients (39%) overall. Percentage improvements both at the end of MT and at 24 hours predicted good outcome, with higher predictive capacity at 24 hours (C-statistic, 0.85 vs 0.73, p<0.001). Positive and negative predictive values were 70% and 74% for the >30% cut-off point at the end of MT, and 69% and 84% for the >50% cut-off point at 24 hours, respectively. The adjusted OR for good outcome was 5.8 (95% CI 4.2 to 8.1) and 12.9 (95% CI 9.7 to 17.1), respectively. In patients with posterior circulation stroke, the predictive value of the improvement at 24 hours was similar (C-statistic 0.90).

Conclusion: Clinical improvement of patients within 24 hours of MT is a reliable and robust predictor of long-term prognosis, including patients with posterior circulation occlusions.

Citing Articles

What You Always Wanted to Know about Endovascular Therapy in Acute Ischemic Stroke but Never Dared to Ask: A Comprehensive Review.

Bucke P, Cohen J, Horvath T, Cimpoca A, Bhogal P, Bazner H Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 23(10):340.

PMID: 39077121 PMC: 11267361. DOI: 10.31083/j.rcm2310340.


Time-to-care metrics in patients with interhospital transfer for mechanical thrombectomy in north-east Germany: Primary telestroke centers in rural areas vs. primary stroke centers in a metropolitan area.

Riegler C, Behrens J, Gorski C, Angermaier A, Kinze S, Ganeshan R Front Neurol. 2023; 13:1046564.

PMID: 36698874 PMC: 9868735. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.1046564.


Comparison of predictors of failure of early neurological improvement after successful endovascular treatment for posterior and anterior circulation large vessel occlusion: Data from ANGEL-ACT registry.

Yang X, Yang J, Sun D, Wang A, Tong X, Jia B Interv Neuroradiol. 2022; 30(5):625-636.

PMID: 36266940 PMC: 11569470. DOI: 10.1177/15910199221133164.


Prognostic significance of platelet-to-lymphocyte and platelet-to-neutrophil ratios in patients with mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke.

Kim S, Yi H, Shin D, Kim B J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg. 2022; 24(3):221-231.

PMID: 35443275 PMC: 9537644. DOI: 10.7461/jcen.2022.E2021.10.003.


Aortic and supra-aortic arterial tortuosity and access technique: Impact on time to device deployment in stroke thrombectomy.

Alves Rosa J, Roberts R, Wareham J, Crossley R, Cox A, Mortimer A Interv Neuroradiol. 2020; 27(3):419-426.

PMID: 33215558 PMC: 8190932. DOI: 10.1177/1591019920974183.