» Articles » PMID: 32460860

An Observational Study of Recess Quality and Physical Activity in Urban Primary Schools

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Public Health
Date 2020 May 29
PMID 32460860
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: To date, there is scant literature that examines the recess context concurrent with, but separate from, levels of physical activity. The primary purpose of the current study was to examine how recess quality impacted physical activity levels, and how this was moderated by gender. A secondary purpose was to examine if differences in children's engagement in activities occurred between recess sessions scored as low- or high- quality.

Methods: This was an observational study of children at 13 urban elementary schools in the U.S. Across the 13 schools, data were collected at 55 recess sessions, with 3419 child-level observations (n = 1696 boys; n = 1723 girls). Physical activity data were collected using Fitbit accelerometers, recess quality data were collected using the Great Recess Framework - Observational Tool (GRF-OT), recess engagement data were collected using the Observation of Playground Play (OPP), and basic psychological need satisfaction (BPNS) data were collected using a modified version of the BPNS for recess physical activity survey. Primary analyses were conducted using Hierarchical Linear Modeling (HLM) with children nested within recess sessions.

Results: Gender moderated the relationship between adult engagement and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) (b = .012; 95% CI .001, .024), student behavior and MVPA (b = -.014; 95% CI -.021, -.007), and student behaviors and light physical activity (b = .009, 95% CI .003, .015). Both boys and girls engaged in more play during recess sessions scored as high quality on the GRF-OT. Children reported higher levels of basic psychological need satisfaction at recesses sessions scored as high quality on the GRF-OT.

Conclusions: Results of the current study showed that the quality of the recess environment, and the interactions of both adults and students in that environment, need to be taken into consideration in future school-based recess studies.

Citing Articles

From policy to practice: Examining the role of recess in elementary school.

Thalken J, Massey W, Szarabajko A, Ozenbaugh I, Neilson L Public Health Pract (Oxf). 2022; 2:100091.

PMID: 36101634 PMC: 9461350. DOI: 10.1016/j.puhip.2021.100091.


The Management of Safety Situations and Assumable Risk during Transitions and Recesses in Different Types of Schools.

Flores O, Ramos-Pla A, Arco I Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(7).

PMID: 35409798 PMC: 8998793. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19074117.


The Impact of Wearable Technologies in Health Research: Scoping Review.

Huhn S, Axt M, Gunga H, Maggioni M, Munga S, Obor D JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022; 10(1):e34384.

PMID: 35076409 PMC: 8826148. DOI: 10.2196/34384.

References
1.
Erwin H, Abel M, Beighle A, Noland M, Worley B, Riggs R . The contribution of recess to children's school-day physical activity. J Phys Act Health. 2011; 9(3):442-8. DOI: 10.1123/jpah.9.3.442. View

2.
Pawlowski C, Tjornhoj-Thomsen T, Schipperijn J, Troelsen J . Barriers for recess physical activity: a gender specific qualitative focus group exploration. BMC Public Health. 2014; 14:639. PMC: 4082159. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-639. View

3.
Huberty J, Beets M, Beighle A, Welk G . Environmental modifications to increase physical activity during recess: preliminary findings from ready for recess. J Phys Act Health. 2011; 8 Suppl 2:S249-56. View

4.
Banda J, Haydel K, Davila T, Desai M, Bryson S, Haskell W . Effects of Varying Epoch Lengths, Wear Time Algorithms, and Activity Cut-Points on Estimates of Child Sedentary Behavior and Physical Activity from Accelerometer Data. PLoS One. 2016; 11(3):e0150534. PMC: 4777377. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150534. View

5.
Babkes Stellino M, Sinclair C, Partridge J, King K . Differences in children's recess physical activity: recess activity of the week intervention. J Sch Health. 2010; 80(9):436-44. DOI: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2010.00525.x. View