» Articles » PMID: 32456705

Trends and Determinants of Adolescent Childbirth in Uganda- Analysis of Rural and Urban Women Using Six Demographic and Health Surveys, 1988-2016

Overview
Journal Reprod Health
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2020 May 28
PMID 32456705
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Uganda has high adolescent pregnancy. The details of adolescent childbirth and urban/rural patterns are scarce. We investigated the levels, time trends and determinants of adolescent childbirth in Uganda separately for urban and rural women.

Methods: We estimated the percentage of women 20-24 years at each of the six Uganda Demographic and Health Surveys (1988/89, 1995, 2000/01, 2006, 2011 and 2016) who reported a live childbirth before age 20 years ("adolescent childbirth"), and examined change over time using t-test. A modified multivariable Poisson regression was used to examine determinants of having adolescent childbirth on the 2016 survey.

Results: Among these women, 67.5, 66.4, 70.1, 62.3, 57.3 and 54.1% reported an adolescent childbirth in 1988/89, 1995, 2000/01, 2006, 2011 and 2016 surveys, respectively. Between 1988/89 to 2000/01, there was no evidence of change (+ 2.6% point (pp), p = 0.170), unlike between the 2000/01 and 2016 surveys when a significant decline occurred (- 16.0 pp., p < 0.001). First childbirth < 18 years of age declined by - 13.5 pp. (p < 0.001) between 2000/01 and 2016. There was no change over time in the percentage of adolescents 18-19.9 years of age having first childbirth. Among rural residents, childbirth < 18 years declined from 43.8% in 1988/89 to 32.7% in 2016 (- 11.1 pp., p < 0.001), in urban it declined from 28.3 to 18.2% (- 10.1 pp., p = 0.006). There was an increase over time in the percentage of women, both rural and urban, who wanted to delay their first pregnancy. Independent determinants of reporting an adolescent childbirth in both urban and rural residents were: no education/incomplete primary and younger age at first sex. Additional determinants for rural women were residence in Eastern region, Muslim religion, and poor household wealth index.

Conclusion: In the 30-year period examined, adolescent childbirth in Uganda declined from highs of 7 in 10 to approximately 5 in 10 women, with more wanting to delay the pregnancy. The decline started after the 2000/01 survey and affected predominantly younger adolescent childbirth < 18 years among both rural and urban residence women. Efforts need to be intensified to sustain the decline in adolescent pregnancies. Targeted and specific strategies for urban and rural areas might be required.

Citing Articles

Awareness of cervical cancer risk factors and preventive approaches, and perceived causes of cervical cancer among secondary school girls: a cross-sectional study in Northern Uganda.

Oringtho S, Mwaka A, Orach C, Wabinga H Ann Med. 2024; 56(1):2374860.

PMID: 38975806 PMC: 11232641. DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2374860.


Scoping review of qualitative studies on family planning in Uganda.

Buser J, Pebolo P, August E, Rana G, Gray R, Jacobson-Davies F PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024; 4(7):e0003313.

PMID: 38959214 PMC: 11221757. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003313.


Update on the practice of premarital screening for sickle cell traits in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Dilli P, Obeagu E, Tamale A, Ajugwo A, Pius T, Makeri D BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):1467.

PMID: 38822327 PMC: 11143629. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-19001-y.


Study protocol for a type-II hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial to reach teenagers using mobile money shops to reduce unintended pregnancies in Uganda.

Komasawa M, Sato M, Ssekitoleko R, Waiswa P, Gitta S, Nabugoomu J BMJ Open. 2024; 14(4):e084539.

PMID: 38582537 PMC: 11002355. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084539.


How a co-design process led to more contextually relevant family planning interventions in emerging urban settings in Eastern Uganda.

Ssanyu J, Kananura R, Birabwa C, Kizito F, Namutamba S, Akongo D PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023; 3(9):e0002421.

PMID: 37773920 PMC: 10540946. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002421.


References
1.
Yakubu I, Salisu W . Determinants of adolescent pregnancy in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review. Reprod Health. 2018; 15(1):15. PMC: 5787272. DOI: 10.1186/s12978-018-0460-4. View

2.
Christofides N, Jewkes R, Dunkle K, McCarty F, Shai N, Nduna M . Risk factors for unplanned and unwanted teenage pregnancies occurring over two years of follow-up among a cohort of young South African women. Glob Health Action. 2014; 7:23719. PMC: 4141943. DOI: 10.3402/gha.v7.23719. View

3.
Chandra-Mouli V, Lane C, Wong S . What Does Not Work in Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health: A Review of Evidence on Interventions Commonly Accepted as Best Practices. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2015; 3(3):333-40. PMC: 4570008. DOI: 10.9745/GHSP-D-15-00126. View

4.
Leftwich H, Alves M . Adolescent Pregnancy. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2017; 64(2):381-388. DOI: 10.1016/j.pcl.2016.11.007. View

5.
Odimegwu C, Mkwananzi S . Factors Associated with Teen Pregnancy in sub-Saharan Africa: A Multi-Country Cross-Sectional Study. Afr J Reprod Health. 2018; 20(3):94-107. DOI: 10.29063/ajrh2016/v20i3.14. View