» Articles » PMID: 32452292

An Exploration of Precancer and Post-Cancer Diagnosis and Health Communication Among African American Prostate Cancer Survivors and Their Families

Overview
Date 2020 May 27
PMID 32452292
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Prostate cancer is the second most common cancer among American men, with Black men at the highest risk for the disease. Few studies have been published on how communication between Black prostate cancer survivors and their family members affect health outcomes and subsequent health communication. The purpose of this study was to understand cancer and health communication among Black prostate cancer survivors and their families before and after disclosing their diagnosis. Through a mixed method design, 11 Black prostate cancer survivors participated from the Southeastern region of the United States, completed questionnaires, and took part in a focus group. The study utilized 4 focus groups of Black prostate cancer survivors ranging in age from 51 to 76 years. Descriptive statistics revealed 91% ( = 10) of participants indicated they could openly discuss health issues in their family and 82% ( = 9) indicated a female relative as the person responsible for teaching about health. An analysis of the transcripts revealed four themes utilizing thematic network: (a) communication over the life course of the prostate cancer survivor, (b) parents' communication with family, (c) disclosing prostate cancer diagnosis, and (d) treatment options for prostate cancer. Results suggested the participants recognized the importance of discussing prostate cancer with their families to reduce fears and misconceptions about the disease. Through the exploration of cancer and health communication within Black families, solutions can be derived for increasing health behaviors and health knowledge among men.

Citing Articles

From Unheard to Empowered: Utilizing Communication Accommodation Theory to Address Black Men's With Prostate Cancer Healthcare Preferences.

Fullwood D, Fallon E, Bolajoko O, Gunderson J, Ramirez-Rivera C, Pressey S Cancer Control. 2025; 31:10732748241293987.

PMID: 39865591 PMC: 11489940. DOI: 10.1177/10732748241293987.


Addressing Health Illiteracy and Stunting in Culture-Shocked Indigenous Populations: A Case Study of Outer Baduy in Indonesia.

Putri L, Agustin H, Bakti I, Suminar J Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024; 21(9).

PMID: 39337997 PMC: 11431049. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph21091114.


The impact of radical prostatectomy on the social well-being of prostate cancer survivors: A qualitative meta-synthesis.

Eymech O, Brunckhorst O, Deacon M, James C, Bowie J, Dasgupta P Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2022; 31(4):e13630.

PMID: 35754206 PMC: 11497296. DOI: 10.1111/ecc.13630.


Supportive care needs of men with prostate cancer: A systematic review update.

Prashar J, Schartau P, Murray E Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2022; 31(2):e13541.

PMID: 35038783 PMC: 9285340. DOI: 10.1111/ecc.13541.

References
1.
Ettridge K, Bowden J, Chambers S, Smith D, Murphy M, Evans S . "Prostate cancer is far more hidden…": Perceptions of stigma, social isolation and help-seeking among men with prostate cancer. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2017; 27(2):e12790. DOI: 10.1111/ecc.12790. View

2.
Kitzinger J . Qualitative research. Introducing focus groups. BMJ. 1995; 311(7000):299-302. PMC: 2550365. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.311.7000.299. View

3.
Nettey O, Walker A, Keeter M, Singal A, Nugooru A, Martin I . Self-reported Black race predicts significant prostate cancer independent of clinical setting and clinical and socioeconomic risk factors. Urol Oncol. 2018; 36(11):501.e1-501.e8. PMC: 6214716. DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2018.06.011. View

4.
Bowen D, Hay J, Harris-Wai J, Meischke H, Burke W . All in the family? Communication of cancer survivors with their families. Fam Cancer. 2017; 16(4):597-603. PMC: 5624814. DOI: 10.1007/s10689-017-9987-8. View

5.
Powe B, Johnson A . Fatalism as a barrier to cancer screening among African-Americans: Philosophical perspectives. J Relig Health. 2013; 34(2):119-26. DOI: 10.1007/BF02248767. View