» Articles » PMID: 32451945

Detailed Analysis of Margin Positivity and the Site of Local Recurrence After Pancreaticoduodenectomy

Abstract

Background: The association between a positive surgical margin and local recurrence after resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has been reported. Assessment of the location of the a positive margin and the specific site of local recurrence has not been well described.

Methods: A prospectively maintained database was queried for patients who underwent R0/R1 pancreaticoduodenectomy for PDAC between 2000 and 2015. The pancreatic, posterior, gastric/duodenal, anterior peritoneal, and bile duct margins were routinely assessed. Postoperative imaging was reviewed for the site of first recurrence, and local recurrence was defined as recurrence located in the remnant pancreas, surgical bed, or retroperitoneal site outside the surgical bed.

Results: During the study period, 891 patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy, and 390 patients had an initial local recurrence with or without distant metastases. The 5-year cumulative incidence of local recurrence by site included the remnant pancreas (4%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3-5%), the surgical bed (35%; 95% CI, 32-39%), and other regional retroperitoneal site (4%; 95% CI, 3-6%). In the univariate analysis, positive posterior margin (hazard ratio [HR], 1.50; 95% CI, 1.17-1.91; p = 0.001) and positive lymph nodes (HR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.06-1.75; p = 0.017) were associated with surgical bed recurrence, and in the multivariate analysis, positive posterior margin remained significant (HR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.09-1.81; p = 0.009). An isolated local recurrence was found in 197 patients, and a positive posterior margin was associated with surgical bed recurrence in this subgroup (HR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.08-2.10; p = 0.016).

Conclusion: In this study, the primary association between site of margin positivity and site of local recurrence was between the posterior margin and surgical bed recurrence. Given this association and the limited ability to modify this margin intraoperatively, preoperative assessment should be emphasized.

Citing Articles

TRIANGLE operation, combined with adequate adjuvant chemotherapy, can improve the prognosis of pancreatic head cancer: A retrospective study.

Chen J, Zhu L, Cai Z, Hu X, Ahmed A, Ge J World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2024; 16(5):1773-1786.

PMID: 38764839 PMC: 11099462. DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v16.i5.1773.


Extended lymphadenectomy based on the TRIANGLE for pancreatic head cancer: a single-center experience.

Lei K, Wang J, Wang X, Wang H, Hu R, Zhang H Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024; 409(1):54.

PMID: 38321184 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-024-03245-8.


Utility of intraoperative pathology consultations of whipple resection specimens and their impact on final margin status.

Sina N, Olkhov-Mitsel E, Chen L, Karanicolas P, Sun L, Roopchand P Heliyon. 2023; 9(9):e20238.

PMID: 37810002 PMC: 10560021. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20238.


Conventional partial pancreatoduodenectomy versus an extended pancreatoduodenectomy (triangle operation) for pancreatic head cancers-study protocol for the randomised controlled TRIANGLE trial.

Heger P, Hackert T, Diener M, Feisst M, Klose C, Dorr-Harim C Trials. 2023; 24(1):363.

PMID: 37254179 PMC: 10228091. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07337-6.


The timing and design of stereotactic radiotherapy approaches as a part of neoadjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer: Is it time for change?.

Ryckman J, Reames B, Klute K, Hall W, Baine M, Abdel-Wahab M Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2021; 28:124-128.

PMID: 33981865 PMC: 8085778. DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2021.04.002.


References
1.
Kawabata Y, Tanaka T, Nishi T, Monma H, Yano S, Tajima Y . Appraisal of a total meso-pancreatoduodenum excision with pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic head carcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2012; 38(7):574-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2012.04.007. View

2.
Barbier L, Turrini O, Gregoire E, Viret F, Le Treut Y, Delpero J . Pancreatic head resectable adenocarcinoma: preoperative chemoradiation improves local control but does not affect survival. HPB (Oxford). 2010; 13(1):64-9. PMC: 3019544. DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2010.00245.x. View

3.
Bockhorn M, Burdelski C, Bogoevski D, Sgourakis G, Yekebas E, Izbicki J . Arterial en bloc resection for pancreatic carcinoma. Br J Surg. 2010; 98(1):86-92. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.7270. View

4.
Adsay N, Basturk O, Saka B, Bagci P, Ozdemir D, Balci S . Whipple made simple for surgical pathologists: orientation, dissection, and sampling of pancreaticoduodenectomy specimens for a more practical and accurate evaluation of pancreatic, distal common bile duct, and ampullary tumors. Am J Surg Pathol. 2014; 38(4):480-93. PMC: 4051141. DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000165. View

5.
Pang T, Wilson O, Argueta M, Hugh T, Chou A, Samra J . Frozen section of the pancreatic neck margin in pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma is of limited utility. Pathology. 2014; 46(3):188-92. DOI: 10.1097/PAT.0000000000000072. View