» Articles » PMID: 32441298

Risk of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Women Achieving Singleton Pregnancy Spontaneously or After ART: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview
Date 2020 May 23
PMID 32441298
Citations 43
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Women who achieve pregnancy by ART show an increased risk of obstetric and perinatal complications compared with those with spontaneous conception (SC).

Objective And Rationale: The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to synthesize the best available evidence regarding the association between ART and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in women with singleton pregnancies. The research question asked was whether the risk of GDM is higher in women achieving singleton pregnancy by ART compared with those achieving singleton pregnancy spontaneously.

Search Methods: A literature search, in MEDLINE, Scopus and Cochrane databases, covering the period 1978-2019, was performed aiming to identify studies comparing the risk of GDM in singleton pregnancies after ART versus after SC. Both matched and unmatched studies were considered eligible. Meta-analysis of weighted data was performed using the random effects model. Results were reported as risk ratio (RR) with 95% CI. Heterogeneity was quantified with the I2 index.

Outcomes: The study reports on 63 760 women who achieved a singleton pregnancy after ART (GDM was present in 4776) and 1 870 734 women who achieved a singleton pregnancy spontaneously (GDM in 158 526). Women with singleton pregnancy achieved by ART showed a higher risk of GDM compared with those with singleton pregnancy achieved spontaneously (RR 1.53, 95% CI 1.39-1.69; I2 78.6%, n = 37, 1 893 599 women). The direction or the magnitude of the effect observed did not change in subgroup analysis based on whether the study was matched (n = 17) or unmatched (n = 20) (matched: RR 1.42, 95% CI 1.17-1.72; I2 61.5%-unmatched: RR 1.58, 95% CI 1.40-1.78; I2 84.1%) or whether it was prospective (n = 12) or retrospective (n = 25) (prospective studies: RR 1.52, 95% CI 1.27-1.83, I2 62.2%-retrospective studies: RR 1.53, 95% CI 1.36-1.72, I2 82.5%). Regarding the method of fertilization, a higher risk of GDM after ART versus SC was observed after IVF (n = 7), but not after ICSI (n = 6), (IVF: RR 1.95, 95% CI 1.56-2.44, I2 43.1%-ICSI: RR 1.42, 95% CI 0.94-2.15, I2 73.5%). Moreover, regarding the type of embryo transfer (ET), a higher risk of GDM after ART versus SC was observed after fresh (n = 14) but not after frozen (n = 3) ET (fresh ET: RR 1.38, 95% CI 1.03-1.85, I2 75.4%-frozen ET: RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.10-2.19; I2 73.1%). A higher risk of GDM was observed after ART regardless of whether the eligible studies included patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (RR 1.49, 95% CI 1.33-1.66, I2 75.0%) or not (RR 4.12, 95% CI 2.63-6.45, I2 0%), or whether this information was unclear (RR 1.46, 95% CI 1.22-1.75, I2 77.7%).

Wider Implications: The present systematic review and meta-analysis, by analysing 1 893 599 women, showed a higher risk of GDM in women achieving singleton pregnancy by ART compared with those achieving singleton pregnancy spontaneously. This finding highlights the importance of early detection of GDM in women treated by ART that could lead to timely and effective interventions, prior to ART as well as during early pregnancy.

Citing Articles

Reduced low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels are associated with increased risk of gestational diabetes mellitus in Chinese women.

Zeng S, Liu Q, Wu Y, Bai H, Fan P, Liu X Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):6435.

PMID: 39984726 PMC: 11845585. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-91258-8.


Prevalence and risk factors of gestational diabetes mellitus among pregnant women in northern Vietnam: a cross-sectional study.

Le H, Nguyen T, Nguyen D, Sondergaard Linde D, Bygbjerg I, Sondergaard J Glob Health Action. 2025; 18(1):2460339.

PMID: 39925195 PMC: 11812109. DOI: 10.1080/16549716.2025.2460339.


Risk of placenta previa in assisted reproductive technology: A Nordic population study with sibling analyses.

Landsverk E, Westvik-Johari K, Wennerholm U, Bergh C, Kyhl F, Spangmose A PLoS Med. 2025; 22(2):e1004536.

PMID: 39899615 PMC: 11835333. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004536.


Interacting and joint effects of assisted reproductive technology and gestational diabetes mellitus on preterm birth and the mediating role of gestational diabetes mellitus: a cohort study using a propensity score.

Xiang Y, Xu Z, Xiao R, Yao Y, Tang X, Fu L J Assist Reprod Genet. 2025; 42(2):489-498.

PMID: 39812765 PMC: 11871168. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-024-03342-z.


[Obstetric and neonatal outcomes in pregnancies conceived by assisted reproductive technology in an Argentine cohort].

Diez Brito M, Sevillano G, Negri F, Mongelos M, Izbizky G Rev Fac Cien Med Univ Nac Cordoba. 2024; 81(4):734-751.

PMID: 39670905 PMC: 11905777. DOI: 10.31053/1853.0605.v81.n4.44425.


References
1.
Jackson R, Gibson K, Wu Y, Croughan M . Perinatal outcomes in singletons following in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 103(3):551-63. DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000114989.84822.51. View

2.
Pandey S, Shetty A, Hamilton M, Bhattacharya S, Maheshwari A . Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from IVF/ICSI: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2012; 18(5):485-503. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dms018. View

3.
Vermey B, Buchanan A, Chambers G, Kolibianakis E, Bosdou J, Chapman M . Are singleton pregnancies after assisted reproduction technology (ART) associated with a higher risk of placental anomalies compared with non-ART singleton pregnancies? A systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG. 2018; 126(2):209-218. DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.15227. View

4.
Yang P, Kang H, Ma C, Wei Y, Tao L, Wu Z . Risk of preterm delivery in singletons conceived by fertilization. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2019; 35(8):661-664. DOI: 10.1080/09513590.2018.1525702. View

5.
Lee B, Koeppel A, Wang E, Gonzalez T, Sun T, Kroener L . Differential gene expression during placentation in pregnancies conceived with different fertility treatments compared with spontaneous pregnancies. Fertil Steril. 2019; 111(3):535-546. PMC: 7156023. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.11.005. View