» Articles » PMID: 32440163

An Asthma Specialist's Consult Letter: What Do Parents Think About Receiving a Copy?

Overview
Publisher Dove Medical Press
Date 2020 May 23
PMID 32440163
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Written summaries about visits with general practitioners' have influenced increased patient knowledge, satisfaction, recollection, and compliance, and strengthened the doctor-patient relationship. All previous studies about this communication pre-dated the electronic medical record (EMR) era, and none examined views from parents of children with asthma. We explored parents' perceptions about receiving a hard copy summary Letter immediately following the visit, with the pediatric asthma specialist about findings and the care plan for their child.

Methods: A Parent Advisory Council helped inform this pilot study, an observational cross-sectional electronic survey. Each Letter included a comprehensive summary of the child's visit with the specialist.

Results: Previous findings from patients about the benefits of receiving this Letter were strongly supported by data from 51 participants. Interestingly, more than 54% of respondents preferred receiving a hard copy Letter over an electronic copy, and 98% wanted other clinicians to adopt this practice.

Conclusion: Parents of children with asthma value and want timely written information of this nature from other clinicians.

Practice Implications: These results can influence further asthma research to promote a change in the perceptions of clinicians, parents, and patients about timely access to health information in the EMR era.

Citing Articles

Electronic Communication Between Children's Caregivers and Health Care Teams: Scoping Review on Parental Caregiver's Perceptions and Experience.

Gamper M, Singer Cohen R, Esperanza Razaz M, Parrillo E, Thornton C, Wec A JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2024; 7:e60352.

PMID: 39671597 PMC: 11661689. DOI: 10.2196/60352.


In Anticipation of Sharing Pediatric Inpatient Notes: Focus Group Study With Stakeholders.

Smith C, Kelly M J Particip Med. 2022; 14(1):e37759.

PMID: 35635743 PMC: 9153906. DOI: 10.2196/37759.

References
1.
Damian D, Tattersall M . Letters to patients: improving communication in cancer care. Lancet. 1991; 338(8772):923-5. DOI: 10.1016/0140-6736(91)91782-p. View

2.
Delbanco T, Walker J, Bell S, Darer J, Elmore J, Farag N . Inviting patients to read their doctors' notes: a quasi-experimental study and a look ahead. Ann Intern Med. 2012; 157(7):461-70. PMC: 3908866. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-7-201210020-00002. View

3.
Amirav I . Transparency of care. CMAJ. 2015; 187(4):278. PMC: 4347779. DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.1150013. View

4.
Jelley D, Van Zwanenberg T . Copying general practitioner referral letters to patients: a study of patients' views. Br J Gen Pract. 2000; 50(457):657-8. PMC: 1313780. View

5.
Perkins P, Alice J, Wendy P, Claud R . Copying letters to patients: a survey of patients and GPs views. Palliat Med. 2007; 21(4):355-6. DOI: 10.1177/0269216307077793. View