» Articles » PMID: 32434977

Evaluation of Sealing Ability of Three Root Canal Sealers: An Study

Overview
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2020 May 22
PMID 32434977
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the sealing ability of three different types of sealers using confocal laser microscopy.

Materials And Methods: Sixty extracted single-root premolars were selected and divided into three groups (20 teeth in each group) according to the type of sealer used, namely, mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) Fillapex, AH Plus, and Bio C Sealer. Root canal preparation and obturation were done in all the samples. Roots was dissected transversely in apical plane. Percentage of gap from region to canal circumference was calculated using a confocal laser microscope. Samples were subjected to statistical analysis.

Results: High dye penetration was seen with AH Plus compared to MTA Fillapex and least with Bio C Sealer. The AH Plus is the best sealer with respect to seal ability of all the three.

Conclusion: This study helps to appraise the sealing ability of the different types of sealers using confocal laser microscopy which is useful for the success of root canal treatment.

Clinical Significance: As sealer has to seal voids, foramina, and canals, it should have good penetration for the success of root canal treatment.

Citing Articles

Stereomicroscopic Evaluation of the Apical Sealing Ability of Different Root Canal Sealers (Endoseal, Apexit, MTA Fillapex, Ceraseal) Using Diaphanization Technique.

Patel M, Gangwar A, Sharma S, Naik S Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024; 17(10):1135-1140.

PMID: 39650292 PMC: 11617443. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2976.


Comparative evaluation of wettability of AH plus, Ceraseal and Guttaflow bioseal root canal sealers on root canal dentin: An study.

Kunam D, Uppalapati Y, Ponnapalli A, Krishna C, Bode Y, Yadatha S J Conserv Dent Endod. 2024; 27(10):1021-1025.

PMID: 39583278 PMC: 11581372. DOI: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_484_24.


Stereomicroscopic evaluation of sealing ability of four different root canal sealers: an in-vitro study.

Sah S, Mangat P, Kumar A, Sah N, Shivakumar G, Di Blasio M BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24(1):258.

PMID: 38378554 PMC: 10877889. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-03913-7.


Comparison of the sealing ability of bioceramic sealer against epoxy resin based sealer: A systematic review & meta-analysis.

Rekha R, Kavitha R, Venkitachalam R, Prabath S, Deepthy S, Krishnan V J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2022; 13(1):28-35.

PMID: 36345495 PMC: 9636474. DOI: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2022.10.006.


Comparison of Sealing Abilities Among Zinc Oxide Eugenol Root-Canal Filling Cement, Antibacterial Bioceramic Paste, and Epoxy Resin, using Enterococcus faecalis as a Microbial Tracer.

Kelmendi T, Kocani F, Kurti A, Kamberi B, Kamberi A Med Sci Monit Basic Res. 2022; 28:e936319.

PMID: 35771490 PMC: 9169682. DOI: 10.12659/MSMBR.936319.