» Articles » PMID: 32432194

Assessment of Content, Quality and Compliance of the STaR Mobile Application for Smoking Cessation

Overview
Journal Tob Prev Cessat
Date 2020 May 21
PMID 32432194
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Smoking cessation support with smartphone applications is widely practised, however, quality and novel content is yet to be established. This study examined content, quality and compliance of the STaR (Sihat Tanpa Rokok - Healthy Without Smoking) smartphone application to smoking cessation clinical practice guidelines.

Methods: Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS) was applied to assess the quality of the mobile application. A total of 33 compliance assessment criteria were developed, based on the smoking cessation clinical practice guidelines adopted by the Brunei Ministry of Health and used to rate the compliance.

Results: The STaR app has an average quality and compliance score. The mean MARS score of 3.31 and a subjective quality score of 2.50 was measured on a 5-point scale (from 1=inadequate to 5=excellent). The application contents that adhere to smoking cessation clinical practice guidelines suggest adequate adherence to the 5A (Ask, Advice, Assess, Assist, Arrange) and 5R motivational interventions (Relevance, Risks, Rewards, Roadblocks, Repetition) approach for smoking cessation.

Conclusions: The STaR mobile app with the integration of all components of smoking cessation clinical practice guidelines (such as 5A approach and pharmacotherapy intervention) may improve quality scores.

Citing Articles

An approach to persons who are not willing to engage in behavioural change.

Omole O, Pretorius D, Von Pressentin K S Afr Fam Pract (2004). 2024; 66(1):e1-e5.

PMID: 39221727 PMC: 11369572. DOI: 10.4102/safp.v66i1.5874.


Identification and Evaluation of Methodologies to Assess the Quality of Mobile Health Apps in High-, Low-, and Middle-Income Countries: Rapid Review.

Woulfe F, Fadahunsi K, Smith S, Chirambo G, Larsson E, Henn P JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021; 9(10):e28384.

PMID: 34636737 PMC: 8548973. DOI: 10.2196/28384.


Safety concerns with consumer-facing mobile health applications and their consequences: a scoping review.

Akbar S, Coiera E, Magrabi F J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019; 27(2):330-340.

PMID: 31599936 PMC: 7025360. DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocz175.


Smartphone Apps About Crystal Methamphetamine ("Ice"): Systematic Search in App Stores and Assessment of Composition and Quality.

Chapman C, Champion K, Birrell L, Deen H, Brierley M, Stapinski L JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018; 6(11):e10442.

PMID: 30463834 PMC: 6282015. DOI: 10.2196/10442.

References
1.
Masters K . Health professionals as mobile content creators: teaching medical students to develop mHealth applications. Med Teach. 2014; 36(10):883-9. DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.916783. View

2.
Watson A, Alber J, Barnett T, Mercado R, Bernhardt J . Content Analysis of Anti-Tobacco Videogames: Characteristics, Content, and Qualities. Games Health J. 2016; 5(3):216-23. DOI: 10.1089/g4h.2015.0096. View

3.
McMillan B, Hickey E, Patel M, Mitchell C . Quality assessment of a sample of mobile app-based health behavior change interventions using a tool based on the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence behavior change guidance. Patient Educ Couns. 2015; 99(3):429-435. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.10.023. View

4.
Doll R, Peto R, Boreham J, Sutherland I . Mortality in relation to smoking: 50 years' observations on male British doctors. BMJ. 2004; 328(7455):1519. PMC: 437139. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.38142.554479.AE. View

5.
Borrelli B, Bartlett Y, Tooley E, Armitage C, Wearden A . Prevalence and Frequency of mHealth and eHealth Use Among US and UK Smokers and Differences by Motivation to Quit. J Med Internet Res. 2015; 17(7):e164. PMC: 4526978. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.4420. View