» Articles » PMID: 32430633

Preoperative Factors to Select Vitrectomy or Scleral Buckling for Retinal Detachment in Microincision Vitrectomy Era

Overview
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2020 May 21
PMID 32430633
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: To determine the preoperative factors associated with selecting scleral buckling (SB) or pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) to treat rhegmatogenous retinal detachments (RRDs) in the era of microincision vitrectomy surgery.

Methods: A nationwide, multicenter, observational study in the Japan Retinal Detachment Registry was done. From February 2016 to March 2017, 3446 cases were registered, and 3219 among them were analyzed. The factors related to the patient or surgeon were selected; the surgeon's factor included years of experience, number of cases registered, and current activity. The odds ratio (OR) for factors associated with SB or PPV was estimated by a mixed logistic regression model.

Results: SB was selected in 24.2% (779/3219), PPV was in 71.5% (2238/3219), and PPV+SB was in 6.3% (202/3219). Multivariate analysis showed that age [< 70 years old, OR 4.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.34-7.79, P < 0.001], visual acuity [1.0+ (OR 7.41, 95% CI 3.47-15.82, P < 0.001)], pseudo-phakia (OR 4.83, 95%CI 2.11-10.56, P < 0.001), retinal tear (OR 6.92, 95% CI 4.83-9.92, P < 0.001), breaks at/near the vitreous base (OR 8.07, 95% CI 3.50-18.62, P < 0.001), 90+° retinal tear (OR 108.24, 95% CI 7.44-1574.34, P < 0.001), and number of breaks 4+ (OR 3.15, 95% CI 1.95-5.09, P < 0.001), were significantly associated with selecting PPV over SB. The surgeons' activity defined as the number of cases experienced during the registry period was related to the selection of PPV (OR 3.83, 95% CI 2.11-6.93, P < 0.001).

Conclusions: The choice of PPV for the RRD was associated not only with patients' preoperative factors but also the surgeon's activity. Active surgeons selected PPV more than SB.

Citing Articles

Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Repair by Pars Plana Vitrectomy with and without Scleral Buckling: A Propensity Score Analysis.

Rajsirisongsri P, Patikulsila D, Phinyo P, Kunavisarut P, Chaikitmongkol V, Nanegrungsunk O Clin Ophthalmol. 2024; 18:3913-3923.

PMID: 39734599 PMC: 11680668. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S494849.


Japan-epiretinal membrane (J-ERM) registry: A prospective cohort study protocol investigating the surgical outcome of epiretinal membrane.

Kanzaki Y, Matoba R, Ishihara K, Morita T, Muraoka Y, Kimura S PLoS One. 2024; 19(2):e0297347.

PMID: 38329968 PMC: 10852224. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297347.


Efficacy of vitrectomy with air tamponade for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a prospective study.

Nishi K, Nakamura M, Nishitsuka K Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):10790.

PMID: 37402777 PMC: 10319714. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-37693-x.


Surgical decisions and outcomes of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: Data from a tertiary referral center in Taiwan.

Wu P, Chou H, Hwang Y, Kang E, Chen Y, Liu L Indian J Ophthalmol. 2023; 71(6):2548-2554.

PMID: 37322678 PMC: 10417975. DOI: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_2513_22.


Main Principles of Vitrectomy Using Intraocular Tamponades - A Basic Course in Surgery.

Framme C, Sachs H, Wachtlin J, Bechrakis N, Hoerauf H, Gabel V Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2022; 239(11):1337-1353.

PMID: 36410334 PMC: 9678440. DOI: 10.1055/a-1929-9413.


References
1.
Ah-Fat F, Sharma M, Majid M, McGalliard J, Wong D . Trends in vitreoretinal surgery at a tertiary referral centre: 1987 to 1996. Br J Ophthalmol. 1999; 83(4):396-8. PMC: 1722995. DOI: 10.1136/bjo.83.4.396. View

2.
Feltgen N, Weiss C, Wolf S, Ottenberg D, Heimann H . Scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment study (SPR Study): recruitment list evaluation. Study report no. 2. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2006; 245(6):803-9. DOI: 10.1007/s00417-006-0399-y. View

3.
Feltgen N, Heimann H, Hoerauf H, Walter P, Hilgers R, Heussen N . Scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment study (SPR study): Risk assessment of anatomical outcome. SPR study report no. 7. Acta Ophthalmol. 2012; 91(3):282-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2011.02344.x. View

4.
Heussen N, Hilgers R, Heimann H, Collins L, Grisanti S . Scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment study (SPR study): multiple-event analysis of risk factors for reoperations. SPR Study report no. 4. Acta Ophthalmol. 2009; 89(7):622-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2009.01766.x. View

5.
Heussen N, Feltgen N, Walter P, Hoerauf H, Hilgers R, Heimann H . Scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment study (SPR Study): predictive factors for functional outcome. Study report no. 6. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2011; 249(8):1129-36. DOI: 10.1007/s00417-011-1619-7. View