» Articles » PMID: 32430014

Prevalence of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis Infection and Clinico-epidemiological Patterns Among Military Personnel in Mullaitivu and Kilinochchi Districts of the Northern Province, Early War-torn Areas in Sri Lanka

Overview
Journal Parasit Vectors
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2020 May 21
PMID 32430014
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The 30-year-old armed conflict in Sri Lanka resulted in a general breakdown of civil administration in the Northern and Eastern provinces, leading to mobilisation of many armed forces personnel to assist with reconstruction and resettlement. This occupational group has been identified as a priority risk group for leishmaniasis.

Methods: Individuals enlisted at all military establishments in Mullaitivu and Kilinochchi districts, Northern Province of Sri Lanka were included. Five thousand individuals were screened for skin lesions between September 2018 and August 2019. Persons with lesions suspected as cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) were further investigated. Information on sociodemographic/other potential risk factors was obtained through an interviewer-administered structured questionnaire. The diagnosis was confirmed by microscopic visualization of parasitic stages from different samples obtained (skin scraping, lesion aspirate and tissue impression smears), histopathology and polymerase chain reaction DNA amplification.

Results: Among 5000 individuals screened, 74 individuals were suspected of having CL. Of these, 67.6% (n = 50) patients were confirmed for CL by microscopy. Around two third of both males (67.6%; n = 48) and females (66.6%; n = 2) were positive for Leishmania. The soldiers belonging to 26-35-year age group reported the highest susceptibility (83.3%; OR: 4.83, 95% CI: 3.49-6.20%). Of the sociodemographic factors, age, wearing short-sleeved upper body clothing as the uniform and non-use of insect repellents were identified as significant risk factors. Most of the CL patients had a single lesion (86.0%; n = 43) of an ulcerative type (34.0%; n = 17), mostly on their upper limb (67.9%; n = 34). Lesions were mostly 5-10 mm diameter (59.9%; n = 30) in size with poorly defined margins (72.0%; n = 36). Amongst the diagnostic techniques, microscopic examination of slit skin smear and tissue impression smear were able to discriminate the majority of patients (92.1%; n = 46) for CL.

Conclusions: In order to highlight the true burden of leishmaniasis in the military personnel, cases of leishmaniasis from military institutes should be recognized as a different entity per say and be included in the national figures so as to depict the real magnitude of the disease burden amongst this high-risk group.

Citing Articles

Cutaneous leishmaniasis in British troops following jungle training in Belize: Cumulative incidence and potential risk practices.

Niba Rawlings N, Bailey M, Craig P, Courtenay O Parasite Epidemiol Control. 2024; 27:e00385.

PMID: 39434901 PMC: 11492731. DOI: 10.1016/j.parepi.2024.e00385.


Clinical pattern and treatment outcome of cutaneous leishmaniasis patients in Somali region, eastern Ethiopia.

Muse A, Ibrahim M, Ibrahim M Skin Health Dis. 2024; 4(5):e416.

PMID: 39355748 PMC: 11442055. DOI: 10.1002/ski2.416.


Occupational exposure to malaria, leishmaniasis and arbovirus vectors in endemic regions: A systematic review.

Msellemu D, Tanner M, Yadav R, Moore S Curr Res Parasitol Vector Borne Dis. 2024; 6:100185.

PMID: 39027087 PMC: 11252614. DOI: 10.1016/j.crpvbd.2024.100185.


'We do not rush to the hospital for ordinary wounds (suḷu tuvāla)': A qualitative study on the early clinical manifestations of cutaneous leishmaniasis and associated health behaviours in rural Sri Lanka.

Gunasekara S, Wickramasinghe N, Agampodi S, Fernando M, Weerakoon K, Liyanage C PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2023; 17(5):e0010939.

PMID: 37172051 PMC: 10208456. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0010939.


Assessment of knowledge and perceptions on leishmaniasis: An island-wide study in Sri Lanka.

Dewasurendra R, Silva H, Samaranayake N, Manamperi N, de Silva N, Karunanayake P PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2022; 16(10):e0010821.

PMID: 36228029 PMC: 9560589. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0010821.


References
1.
Uranw S, Meheus F, Baltussen R, Rijal S, Boelaert M . The household costs of visceral leishmaniasis care in south-eastern Nepal. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013; 7(2):e2062. PMC: 3585119. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002062. View

2.
Ranawaka R, Abeygunasekara P, Weerakoon H . Correlation of clinical, parasitological and histopathological diagnosis of cutaneous leishmaniasis in an endemic region in Sri Lanka. Ceylon Med J. 2013; 57(4):149-52. DOI: 10.4038/cmj.v57i4.5082. View

3.
Wijerathna T, Gunathilaka N, Gunawardena K . The Economic Impact of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis in Sri Lanka. Biomed Res Int. 2018; 2018:3025185. PMC: 6201334. DOI: 10.1155/2018/3025185. View

4.
Rajapaksa U, Ihalamulla R, Udagedera C, Karunaweera N . Cutaneous leishmaniasis in southern Sri Lanka. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2007; 101(8):799-803. DOI: 10.1016/j.trstmh.2006.05.013. View

5.
Khatri M, Haider N . Cutaneous leishmaniasis in Yemen. Int J Dermatol. 1999; 38(8):587-90. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-4362.1999.00756.x. View