» Articles » PMID: 32429262

Somatic Marker Production Deficits Do Not Explain the Relationship Between Psychopathic Traits and Utilitarian Moral Decision Making

Overview
Journal Brain Sci
Publisher MDPI
Date 2020 May 21
PMID 32429262
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In moral dilemma tasks, high levels of psychopathic traits often predict increased utilitarian responding-specifically, endorsing sacrificing one person to save many. Research suggests that increased arousal (i.e., somatic marker production) underlies lower rates of utilitarian responding during moral dilemmas. Though deficient somatic marker production is characteristic of psychopathy, how this deficit affects the psychopathy-utilitarian connection remains unknown. We assessed psychopathic traits in undergraduates, as well as behavioral performance and skin conductance level reactivity (SCL-R; a measure of somatic marker production) during a moral dilemma task. High psychopathic traits and low SCL-R were associated with increased utilitarian decisions in dilemmas involving direct personal harm. Psychopathic traits were unrelated to SCL-R, nor did SCL-R mediate the relationship between psychopathy and utilitarianism. The present study did not find evidence that somatic marker production explains the connection between utilitarianism and psychopathy in a college population. Further research is necessary to identify the neural mechanisms relating psychopathy and moral decision-making in nonclinical samples.

Citing Articles

Understanding Emotions: Origins and Roles of the Amygdala.

Simic G, Tkalcic M, Vukic V, Mulc D, Spanic E, Sagud M Biomolecules. 2021; 11(6).

PMID: 34072960 PMC: 8228195. DOI: 10.3390/biom11060823.

References
1.
Greene J, Sommerville R, Nystrom L, Darley J, Cohen J . An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science. 2001; 293(5537):2105-8. DOI: 10.1126/science.1062872. View

2.
Kahane G, Everett J, Earp B, Farias M, Savulescu J . 'Utilitarian' judgments in sacrificial moral dilemmas do not reflect impartial concern for the greater good. Cognition. 2014; 134:193-209. PMC: 4259516. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.10.005. View

3.
Veit R, Konicar L, Klinzing J, Barth B, Yilmaz O, Birbaumer N . Deficient fear conditioning in psychopathy as a function of interpersonal and affective disturbances. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013; 7:706. PMC: 3829462. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00706. View

4.
Bartels D, Pizarro D . The mismeasure of morals: antisocial personality traits predict utilitarian responses to moral dilemmas. Cognition. 2011; 121(1):154-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.05.010. View

5.
Fanti K, Kyranides M, Georgiou G, Petridou M, Colins O, Tuvblad C . Callous-unemotional, impulsive-irresponsible, and grandiose-manipulative traits: Distinct associations with heart rate, skin conductance, and startle responses to violent and erotic scenes. Psychophysiology. 2017; 54(5):663-672. DOI: 10.1111/psyp.12837. View