» Articles » PMID: 32426576

Laparoscopic Surgery for Benign Adnexal Conditions Under Spinal Anaesthesia: Towards a Multidisciplinary Minimally Invasive Approach

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic gynaecological surgery is commonly performed under general anaesthesia with endotracheal intubation. In general surgery, locoregional anaesthesia was applied to laparoscopic procedures, increasing minimally invasive surgery advantages.

Aims: To assess and compare postoperative pain after laparoscopic adnexal procedures for benign conditions under spinal anaesthesia (SA) versus general anaesthesia (GA). Furthermore, anaesthesiologic, surgical and clinical data were evaluated in both groups.

Materials And Methods: This is a prospective cohort study performed in a tertiary level referral centre for minimally invasive gynaecological surgery (Gynaecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, University of Bologna). Women scheduled for adnexal laparoscopic surgery for benign conditions between February and May 2019 were assigned to receive either SA or GA with endotracheal intubation. A sample size of 13 women per group was needed to detect a 2-point difference in pain scores.

Main Findings: 13 women were enrolled in the SA arm, 15 in the GA arm. In the SA cohort, the most common intraoperative adverse event was shoulder pain, reported by 3/12 women. At 1, 8, 12, 24 and 48 h after surgery pain was significantly lower in the SA arm (p < .05). Patients submitted to SA experienced no need for opioid drugs administration, unlike those receiving GA. Patients' mobilization and return of bowel function were noted significantly earlier in the SA group (p < .05).

Conclusions: SA is a feasible, safe and effective anaesthesiologic technique for laparoscopic gynaecological procedures for benign conditions, allowing a better control of postoperative pain. Women undergoing SA achieve earlier mobilization and bowel canalization. During the Covid-19 pandemics, SA could be useful in reducing the need for invasive procedures on respiratory tract.

Citing Articles

Comparative analysis of spinal anesthesia versus general anesthesia in single-port access laparoscopic adnexal surgery: a propensity score matching study.

Eoh K, Ahn J, Park J, Park S, Cho Y, Song S BMC Womens Health. 2025; 25(1):83.

PMID: 39994702 PMC: 11849393. DOI: 10.1186/s12905-025-03604-7.


Ultra-low-impact laparoscopy: a new concept for a minimally invasive surgery.

Giampaolino P, DellAquila M, Cinque F, Bifulco G, Della Corte L Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024; 310(5):2569-2576.

PMID: 39222086 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-024-07707-8.


Gynecological Laparoscopic Surgeries under Spinal Anesthesia: Benefits and Challenges.

Major A, Jumaniyazov K, Jabbarov R, Razzaghi M, Mayboroda I J Pers Med. 2024; 14(6).

PMID: 38929854 PMC: 11204947. DOI: 10.3390/jpm14060633.


Minimally invasive anesthesia for laparoscopic hysterectomy: a case series.

Della Corte L, Mercorio A, Palumbo M, Viciglione F, Cafasso V, Candice A Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022; 306(6):2001-2007.

PMID: 35931899 PMC: 9362356. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-022-06727-6.


Laparoscopic gynecological surgery under minimally invasive anesthesia: a prospective cohort study.

Giampaolino P, Della Corte L, Mercorio A, Bruzzese D, Coviello A, Grasso G Updates Surg. 2022; 74(5):1755-1762.

PMID: 35759109 PMC: 9244282. DOI: 10.1007/s13304-022-01310-9.


References
1.
Singh R, Saini A, Goel N, Bisht D, Seth A . Major laparoscopic surgery under regional anesthesia: A prospective feasibility study. Med J Armed Forces India. 2015; 71(2):126-31. PMC: 4388958. DOI: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2014.12.010. View

2.
Seracchioli R, Venturoli S, Colombo F, Bagnoli A, Vianello F, Govoni F . GnRH agonist treatment before total laparoscopic hysterectomy for large uteri. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2003; 10(3):316-9. DOI: 10.1016/s1074-3804(05)60254-x. View

3.
Holdgate A, Asha S, Craig J, Thompson J . Comparison of a verbal numeric rating scale with the visual analogue scale for the measurement of acute pain. Emerg Med (Fremantle). 2004; 15(5-6):441-6. DOI: 10.1046/j.1442-2026.2003.00499.x. View

4.
Asgari Z, Tavoli Z, Hosseini R, Nataj M, Tabatabaei F, Dehghanizadeh F . A Comparative Study between Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation and Fentanyl to Relieve Shoulder Pain during Laparoscopic Gynecologic Surgery under Spinal Anesthesia: A Randomized Clinical Trail. Pain Res Manag. 2018; 2018:9715142. PMC: 5878866. DOI: 10.1155/2018/9715142. View

5.
Wang X, Zhou Q, Pan D, Deng H, Zhou A, Guo H . Comparison of Postoperative Events between Spinal Anesthesia and General Anesthesia in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Biomed Res Int. 2016; 2016:9480539. PMC: 4976158. DOI: 10.1155/2016/9480539. View