Cosmetic Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction Compared Between Staples and Subcuticular Suture Technique for Wound Closure After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview

Journal Arch Orthop Trauma Surg

Specialties Emergency Medicine
General Surgery
Orthopedics

Date 2020 May 20

PMID 32424445

Citations 4

Authors

Sarthak Nepal

Pakpoom Ruangsomboon

Pacharapol Udomkiat

Aasis Unnanuntana

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Introduction: Staples and subcuticular suture are commonly used wound closure techniques after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). To date, only a few studies have investigated the differences between these two wound closure methods in TKA. Accordingly, this study aimed to compare cosmetic outcome and patient satisfaction between staples and subcuticular suture for post-TKA wound closure.

Materials And Methods: This prospective randomized controlled trial included patients scheduled to undergo TKA at the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery of Siriraj Hospital (Bangkok, Thailand) during June 2018-March 2019. Patients were randomized into the staples or subcuticular suture groups. Hollander Wound Evaluation Scale (HWES), cosmetic-visual analogue scale (VAS), and patient satisfaction-VAS were evaluated at the 6-week and 3-month follow-ups. Functional outcome by the modified Knee Society Knee Scoring System and wound complications were also assessed.

Results: Sixty-two patients (31 per group) were included. There were no significant differences in the HWES, cosmetic-VAS, patient satisfaction-VAS, or wound complication rate between groups at the 6-week or 3-month follow-ups. Wound closure time was significantly shorter in the staples group (p < 0.001), but the total operative time was not significantly different between groups. Modified knee score was significantly better in the suture group at 6 weeks (p = 0.024), but there was no significant difference between groups at 3 months. Significant association was observed between patient satisfaction-VAS and cosmetic-VAS at the 6-week (p = 0.03) and 3-month (p = 0.021) follow-ups.

Conclusion: Subcuticular suture and staples were found to be comparable wound-closure options after TKA relative to cosmetic outcome, patient satisfaction, functional outcome, and wound complication rate at 3-months post-operation.

Citing Articles

Consensus document on the management of wound closure in orthopaedic surgery.

Sanz-Ruiz P, Caeiro-Rey J, Martinez-Pastor J, Martin-Alguacil J, Murcia-Asensio A, Moreta J EFORT Open Rev. 2025; 10(2):82-94.

PMID: 40071985 PMC: 11825138. DOI: 10.1530/EOR-24-0002.

Water-Tight Arthrotomy Joint Closure of Modified Intervastus Approach in Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Sartawi M, Kohlmann J, Abdelsamie K, Rahman H J Clin Med. 2023; 12(12).

PMID: 37373683 PMC: 10299608. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12123985.

Evaluation of Incisional Wound Healing in Dogs after Closure with Staples or Tissue Glue and Comparison to Intradermal Suture Pattern.

Balomenos D, Gouletsou P, Galatos A Animals (Basel). 2023; 13(3).

PMID: 36766316 PMC: 9913468. DOI: 10.3390/ani13030426.

Factors contributing to 1-year dissatisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: a nomogram prediction model.

Muertizha M, Cai X, Ji B, Aimaiti A, Cao L J Orthop Surg Res. 2022; 17(1):367.

PMID: 35902950 PMC: 9330701. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-022-03205-2.

Surgical site infection after wound closure with staples versus sutures in elective knee and hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

van de Kuit A, Krishnan R, Mallee W, Goedhart L, Lambert B, Doornberg J Arthroplasty. 2022; 4(1):12.

PMID: 35241172 PMC: 8896293. DOI: 10.1186/s42836-021-00110-7.

References

Kim Y, Matsuda S, Kim T . Clinical Faceoff: Do We Need Special Strategies for Asian Patients with TKA?. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016; 474(5):1102-7. PMC: 4814436. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-016-4716-4. View

Jiang L, Bin Abd Razak H, Chong H, Tan A . Preoperative patient characteristics and outcomes of total knee arthroplasty in a multiethnic Asian population stratified by ethnicity. J Arthroplasty. 2013; 29(2):304-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.06.002. View

Pivec R, Issa K, Given K, Harwin S, Greene K, Hitt K . A prospective, longitudinal study of patient satisfaction following total knee arthroplasty using the Short-Form 36 (SF-36) survey stratified by various demographic and comorbid factors. J Arthroplasty. 2014; 30(3):374-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.10.013. View

Huang Y, Lee M, Chong H, Ning Y, Lo N, Yeo S . Reasons and Factors Behind Post-Total Knee Arthroplasty Dissatisfaction in an Asian Population. Ann Acad Med Singap. 2017; 46(8):303-309. View

Noble P, Conditt M, Cook K, Mathis K . The John Insall Award: Patient expectations affect satisfaction with total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006; 452:35-43. DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000238825.63648.1e. View

Bourne R, Chesworth B, Davis A, Mahomed N, Charron K . Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not?. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009; 468(1):57-63. PMC: 2795819. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-009-1119-9. View

Newman J, Morgan S, Resende G, Williams A, Hammerberg E, Dayton M . Modality of wound closure after total knee replacement: are staples as safe as sutures? A retrospective study of 181 patients. Patient Saf Surg. 2011; 5(1):26. PMC: 3212897. DOI: 10.1186/1754-9493-5-26. View

Yuenyongviwat V, Iamthanaporn K, Hongnaparak T, Tangtrakulwanich B . A randomised controlled trial comparing skin closure in total knee arthroplasty in the same knee: nylon sutures versus skin staples. Bone Joint Res. 2016; 5(5):185-90. PMC: 4921055. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.55.2000629. View

Han H, Kang S . Relations between long-term glycemic control and postoperative wound and infectious complications after total knee arthroplasty in type 2 diabetics. Clin Orthop Surg. 2013; 5(2):118-23. PMC: 3664670. DOI: 10.4055/cios.2013.5.2.118. View

10.

Payne W, Naidu D, Wheeler C, Barkoe D, Mentis M, Salas R . Wound healing in patients with cancer. Eplasty. 2008; 8:e9. PMC: 2206003. View

11.

Anderson K, Hamm R . Factors That Impair Wound Healing. J Am Coll Clin Wound Spec. 2015; 4(4):84-91. PMC: 4495737. DOI: 10.1016/j.jccw.2014.03.001. View

12.

Sorensen L . Wound healing and infection in surgery. The clinical impact of smoking and smoking cessation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Surg. 2012; 147(4):373-83. DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.2012.5. View

13.

Gunst S, Fessy M . The effect of obesity on mechanical failure after total knee arthroplasty. Ann Transl Med. 2015; 3(20):310. PMC: 4669315. DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2305-5839.2015.10.37. View

14.

Haubner F, Ohmann E, Pohl F, Strutz J, Gassner H . Wound healing after radiation therapy: review of the literature. Radiat Oncol. 2012; 7:162. PMC: 3504517. DOI: 10.1186/1748-717X-7-162. View

15.

Wang A, Armstrong E, Armstrong A . Corticosteroids and wound healing: clinical considerations in the perioperative period. Am J Surg. 2013; 206(3):410-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.11.018. View

16.

Wyles C, Jacobson S, Houdek M, Larson D, Taunton M, Sim F . The Chitranjan Ranawat Award: Running Subcuticular Closure Enables the Most Robust Perfusion After TKA: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015; 474(1):47-56. PMC: 4686502. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-015-4209-x. View

17.

Fabbrocini G, Cameli N, Romano M, Mariano M, Panariello L, Bianca D . Chemotherapy and skin reactions. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2012; 31:50. PMC: 3583303. DOI: 10.1186/1756-9966-31-50. View

18.

Sward P, Friden T, Boegard T, Kostogiannis I, Neuman P, Roos H . Association between varus alignment and post-traumatic osteoarthritis after anterior cruciate ligament injury. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013; 21(9):2040-7. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-013-2550-8. View

19.

Hollander J, Singer A, Valentine S, Henry M . Wound registry: development and validation. Ann Emerg Med. 1995; 25(5):675-85. DOI: 10.1016/s0196-0644(95)70183-4. View

20.

Brokelman R, Haverkamp D, van Loon C, Hol A, Van Kampen A, Veth R . The validation of the visual analogue scale for patient satisfaction after total hip arthroplasty. Eur Orthop Traumatol. 2012; 3(2):101-105. PMC: 3389603. DOI: 10.1007/s12570-012-0100-3. View