Choice of Statistical Model in Observational Studies of ART

Overview

Journal Hum Reprod

Publisher Oxford University Press

Specialty Reproductive Medicine

Date 2020 May 20

PMID 32424400

Citations 12

Authors

Laura E Dodge

Leslie V Farland

Katharine F B Correia

Stacey A Missmer

Emily A Seidler

Jack Wilkinson

Anna M Modest

Michele R Hacker

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Analyzing data on ART presents unique and sometimes complicated challenges related to choosing the unit(s) of analysis and the statistical model. In this commentary, we provide examples of how these challenges arise and guidance for overcoming them. We discuss the implications of different ways to count treatment cycles, considering the perspectives of research questions, data management and analysis and patient counseling. We present the advantages and disadvantages of different statistical models, and finally, we discuss the definition and calculation of the cumulative incidence of live birth, which is a key outcome of research on ART.

Citing Articles

Sperm DNA fragmentation index affect pregnancy outcomes and offspring safety in assisted reproductive technology.

Li F, Duan X, Li M, Ma X Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):356.

PMID: 38172506 PMC: 10764900. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-45091-6.

Blastocyst quality and reproductive and perinatal outcomes: a multinational multicentre observational study.

Zou H, Kemper J, Hammond E, Xu F, Liu G, Xue L Hum Reprod. 2023; 38(12):2391-2399.

PMID: 37877423 PMC: 10694400. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dead212.

Low-dose clomiphene citrate does not reduce implantation and live birth rates in otherwise unstimulated modified natural cycle IVF-retrospective cohort study.

Gradel F, von Wolff M, Schwartz A, Mitter V Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022; 307(4):1073-1081.

PMID: 36525092 PMC: 10023627. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-022-06878-6.

Pregnancy outcomes after oral and injectable ovulation induction in women with infertility with a low antimüllerian hormone level compared with those with a normal antimüllerian hormone level.

Romanski P, Bortoletto P, Malmsten J, Tan K, Spandorfer S Fertil Steril. 2022; 118(6):1048-1056.

PMID: 36379757 PMC: 10428173. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.09.010.

Gonadotropin Stimulation Reduces the Implantation and Live Birth Rate but Not the Miscarriage Rate of Embryos Transferred When Compared to Unstimulated In Vitro Fertilization.

Mitter V, Gradel F, Schwartz A, von Wolff M Reprod Sci. 2022; 30(1):283-290.

PMID: 35768691 PMC: 9810560. DOI: 10.1007/s43032-022-01016-8.

References

Farland L, Correia K, Wise L, Williams P, Ginsburg E, Missmer S . P-values and reproductive health: what can clinical researchers learn from the American Statistical Association?. Hum Reprod. 2016; 31(11):2406-2410. PMC: 5088632. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dew192. View

Modest A, Wise L, Fox M, Weuve J, Penzias A, Hacker M . IVF success corrected for drop-out: use of inverse probability weighting. Hum Reprod. 2018; 33(12):2295-2301. PMC: 6238364. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dey309. View

Messerlian C, Gaskins A . Epidemiologic Approaches for Studying Assisted Reproductive Technologies: Design, Methods, Analysis and Interpretation. Curr Epidemiol Rep. 2017; 4(2):124-132. PMC: 5636007. DOI: 10.1007/s40471-017-0105-0. View

Yland J, Messerlian C, Minguez-Alarcon L, Ford J, Hauser R, Williams P . Methodological approaches to analyzing IVF data with multiple cycles. Hum Reprod. 2018; 34(3):549-557. PMC: 6389861. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dey374. View

Missmer S, Pearson K, Ryan L, Meeker J, Cramer D, Hauser R . Analysis of multiple-cycle data from couples undergoing in vitro fertilization: methodologic issues and statistical approaches. Epidemiology. 2011; 22(4):497-504. PMC: 3402159. DOI: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e31821b5351. View

Domar A, Rooney K, Hacker M, Sakkas D, Dodge L . Burden of care is the primary reason why insured women terminate in vitro fertilization treatment. Fertil Steril. 2018; 109(6):1121-1126. PMC: 6080203. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.02.130. View

Zou G . A modified poisson regression approach to prospective studies with binary data. Am J Epidemiol. 2004; 159(7):702-6. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwh090. View

Maheshwari A, McLernon D, Bhattacharya S . Cumulative live birth rate: time for a consensus?. Hum Reprod. 2015; 30(12):2703-7. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dev263. View

Schulz K, Altman D, Moher D . CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials. Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 115(5):1063-1070. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181d9d421. View

10.

von Elm E, Altman D, Egger M, Pocock S, Gotzsche P, Vandenbroucke J . The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Epidemiology. 2007; 18(6):800-4. DOI: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181577654. View

11.

ElMokhallalati Y, van Eekelen R, Bhattacharya S, McLernon D . Treatment-independent live birth after in-vitro fertilisation: a retrospective cohort study of 2,133 women. Hum Reprod. 2019; 34(8):1470-1478. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dez099. View

12.

Malizia B, Hacker M, Penzias A . Cumulative live-birth rates after in vitro fertilization. N Engl J Med. 2009; 360(3):236-43. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0803072. View

13.

Eaton J, Hacker M, Harris D, Thornton K, Penzias A . Assessment of day-3 morphology and euploidy for individual chromosomes in embryos that develop to the blastocyst stage. Fertil Steril. 2008; 91(6):2432-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.03.008. View

14.

Humphries L, Dodge L, Kennedy E, Humm K, Hacker M, Sakkas D . Is younger better? Donor age less than 25 does not predict more favorable outcomes after in vitro fertilization. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019; 36(8):1631-1637. PMC: 6708004. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-019-01494-x. View

15.

Zegers-Hochschild F, Adamson G, Dyer S, Racowsky C, de Mouzon J, Sokol R . The International Glossary on Infertility and Fertility Care, 2017. Fertil Steril. 2017; 108(3):393-406. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.06.005. View

16.

Knol M, Duijnhoven R, Grobbee D, Moons K, Groenwold R . Potential misinterpretation of treatment effects due to use of odds ratios and logistic regression in randomized controlled trials. PLoS One. 2011; 6(6):e21248. PMC: 3116891. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021248. View

17.

Hernan M . The hazards of hazard ratios. Epidemiology. 2009; 21(1):13-5. PMC: 3653612. DOI: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181c1ea43. View

18.

Dodge L, Missmer S, Thornton K, Hacker M . Women's alcohol consumption and cumulative incidence of live birth following in vitro fertilization. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2017; 34(7):877-883. PMC: 5476540. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-017-0923-5. View

19.

Cook T . Advanced statistics: up with odds ratios! A case for odds ratios when outcomes are common. Acad Emerg Med. 2002; 9(12):1430-4. DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2002.tb01616.x. View

20.

Wilkinson J, Bhattacharya S, Duffy J, Kamath M, Marjoribanks J, Repping S . Reproductive medicine: still more ART than science?. BJOG. 2018; 126(2):138-141. DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.15409. View