» Articles » PMID: 32423410

Risk Prediction Models for Dementia: Role of Age and Cardiometabolic Risk Factors

Overview
Journal BMC Med
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2020 May 20
PMID 32423410
Citations 33
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Cardiovascular Risk Factors, Aging, and Incidence of Dementia (CAIDE) risk score is the only currently available midlife risk score for dementia. We compared CAIDE to Framingham cardiovascular Risk Score (FRS) and FINDRISC diabetes score as predictors of dementia and assessed the role of age in their associations with dementia. We then examined whether these risk scores were associated with dementia in those free of cardiometabolic disease over the follow-up.

Methods: A total of 7553 participants, 39-63 years in 1991-1993, were followed for cardiometabolic disease (diabetes, coronary heart disease, stroke) and dementia (N = 318) for a mean 23.5 years. Cox regression was used to model associations of age at baseline, CAIDE, FRS, and FINDRISC risk scores with incident dementia. Predictive performance was assessed using Royston's R, Harrell's C-index, Akaike's information criterion (AIC), the Greenwood-Nam-D'Agostino (GND) test, and calibration-in-the-large. Age effect was also assessed by stratifying analyses by age group. Finally, in multistate models, we examined whether cardiometabolic risk scores were associated with incidence of dementia in persons who remained free of cardiometabolic disease over the follow-up.

Results: Among the risk scores, the predictive performance of CAIDE (C-statistic = 0.714; 95% CI 0.690-0.739) and FRS (C-statistic = 0.719; 95% CI 0.693-0.745) scores was better than FINDRISC (C-statistic = 0.630; 95% CI 0.602-0.659); p < 0.001), AIC difference > 3; R 32.5%, 32.0%, and 12.5%, respectively. When the effect of age in these risk scores was removed by drawing data on risk scores at age 55, 60, and 65 years, the association with dementia in all age groups remained for FRS and FINDRISC, but not for CAIDE. Only FRS at age 55 was associated with dementia in persons who remained free of cardiometabolic diseases prior to dementia diagnosis while no such association was observed at older ages for any risk score.

Conclusions: Our analyses of CAIDE, FRS, and FINDRISC show the FRS in midlife to predict dementia as well as the CAIDE risk score, its predictive value being also evident among individuals who did not develop cardiometabolic events. The importance of age in the predictive performance of all three risk scores highlights the need for the development of multivariable risk scores in midlife for primary prevention of dementia.

Citing Articles

Comparison of seven models for the progression patterns of multiple chronic conditions in longitudinal studies.

Baneshi M, Mishra G, Dobson A BMJ Public Health. 2025; 2(2):e000963.

PMID: 40018552 PMC: 11816716. DOI: 10.1136/bmjph-2024-000963.


A New Computer-Based Cognitive Measure for Early Detection of Dementia Risk (Japan Cognitive Function Test): Validation Study.

Shimada H, Doi T, Tsutsumimoto K, Makino K, Harada K, Tomida K J Med Internet Res. 2025; 27:e59015.

PMID: 39951718 PMC: 11888094. DOI: 10.2196/59015.


Multidimensional relationships between sensory perception and cognitive aging.

Kannan L, Lelo de Larrea-Mancera E, Maniglia M, Vodyanyk M, Gallun F, Jaeggi S Front Aging Neurosci. 2025; 16:1484494.

PMID: 39759398 PMC: 11695427. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2024.1484494.


Development of an individualized dementia risk prediction model using deep learning survival analysis incorporating genetic and environmental factors.

Yuan S, Liu Q, Huang X, Tan S, Bai Z, Yu J Alzheimers Res Ther. 2024; 16(1):278.

PMID: 39736679 PMC: 11684124. DOI: 10.1186/s13195-024-01663-w.


Cognitive impairment among older persons with chronic illness attending primary care and its association with cardiovascular risk using the Framingham risk score.

Balanthiren N, Ali M, Abdul Aziz A BMC Geriatr. 2024; 24(1):891.

PMID: 39472804 PMC: 11520485. DOI: 10.1186/s12877-024-05505-0.


References
1.
Kang L, Chen W, Petrick N, Gallas B . Comparing two correlated C indices with right-censored survival outcome: a one-shot nonparametric approach. Stat Med. 2014; 34(4):685-703. PMC: 4314453. DOI: 10.1002/sim.6370. View

2.
DAgostino Sr R, Vasan R, Pencina M, Wolf P, Cobain M, Massaro J . General cardiovascular risk profile for use in primary care: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 2008; 117(6):743-53. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.699579. View

3.
Silverberg N, Elliott C, Ryan L, Masliah E, Hodes R . NIA commentary on the NIA-AA Research Framework: Towards a biological definition of Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2018; 14(4):576-578. DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2018.03.004. View

4.
Kannel W, McGee D, Gordon T . A general cardiovascular risk profile: the Framingham Study. Am J Cardiol. 1976; 38(1):46-51. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(76)90061-8. View

5.
Tang E, Harrison S, Errington L, Gordon M, Visser P, Novak G . Current Developments in Dementia Risk Prediction Modelling: An Updated Systematic Review. PLoS One. 2015; 10(9):e0136181. PMC: 4559315. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136181. View