Retrospective Analysis of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Physician Medical Control Calls

Overview

Journal West J Emerg Med

Specialty Emergency Medicine

Date 2020 May 19

PMID 32421517

Citations 1

Authors

Balaj Rai

Joseph Tennyson

R Trevor Marshall

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Introduction: Although emergency medical services (EMS) standing-order protocols provide more efficient and accurate on-scene management by paramedics, online medical direction (OLMD) has not been eliminated from practice. In this modern era of OLMD, no studies exist to describe the prevalence of reasons for contacting OLMD.

Objectives: The primary goal of this study was to describe the quantity of and reasons for calls for medical direction. We also sought to determine time diverted from emergency physicians due to OLMD. Finally, we hoped to identify any areas for potential improvement or additional training opportunities for EMS providers.

Methods: This was a descriptive study with retrospective data analysis of recorded OLMD calls from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2016. Data were extracted by research personnel listening to audio recordings and were entered into a database for descriptive analysis. We abstracted the date and length of call, patient demographic information (age and gender), category of call (trauma, medical, cardiac, or obstetrics), reason for call, and origin of call (prehospital, interhospital, nursing home, or discharge).

Results: The total number of recordings analyzed was 519. Calls were divided into four categories pertaining to their nature: 353 (68.5%) medical; 70 (13.6%) trauma; 83 (16.1%) cardiac; and 9 (8%) were obstetrics related. Repeat calls regarding the same patient encounter comprised 48 (9.4%) of the calls. Patient refusal of transport was the most common reason for a call medical direction (32.3% of calls). The total time for medical direction calls for the year was 26.6 hours. The maximum number of calls in a single day was seven, with a mean of 2.04 calls per day (standard deviation [SD] ± 1.18). The mean call length was 3.06 minutes (SD ± 2.51).

Conclusion: Our analysis shows that the use of OLMD frequently involves complex decision-making such as determination of the medical decision-making capacity of patients to refuse treatment and transport, and evaluation of the appropriate level of care for interfacility transfers. Further investigation into the effect of EMS physician-driven medical direction on both the quality and time required for OLMD could allow for better identification of areas of potential improvement and training.

Citing Articles

EMS Administration of Systemic Corticosteroids to Pediatric Asthma Patients: An Analysis by Severity and Transport Interval.

Riney L, Palmer S, Finlay E, Bertrand A, Burcham S, Hendry P Prehosp Emerg Care. 2023; 27(7):900-907.

PMID: 37428954 PMC: 10592383. DOI: 10.1080/10903127.2023.2234996.

References

Harris P, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde J . Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2008; 42(2):377-81. PMC: 2700030. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010. View

Holliman C, Wuerz R, Meador S . Comparison of interventions in prehospital care by standing orders versus interventions ordered by direct [on-line] medical command. Prehosp Disaster Med. 1994; 9(4):202-9. DOI: 10.1017/s1049023x00041406. View

Blanton D, OConnor R . Physician medical direction in EMS. National Association of EMS Physicians. Prehosp Emerg Care. 1998; 2(2):153-7. DOI: 10.1080/10903129808958861. View

Erder M, Davidson S, Cheney R . On-line medical command in theory and practice. Ann Emerg Med. 1989; 18(3):261-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0196-0644(89)80411-1. View

Holliman C, Wuerz R, Meador S . Decrease in medical command errors with use of a "standing orders" protocol system. Am J Emerg Med. 1994; 12(3):279-83. DOI: 10.1016/0735-6757(94)90138-4. View

McSwain Jr N . Medical control--what is it?. JACEP. 1978; 7(3):114-6. DOI: 10.1016/s0361-1124(78)80071-9. View

Cone D, Kim D, Davidson S . Patient-initiated refusals of prehospital care: ambulance call report documentation, patient outcome, and on-line medical command. Prehosp Disaster Med. 1994; 10(1):3-9. DOI: 10.1017/s1049023x0004156x. View

Rottman S, Schriger D, Charlop G, Salas J, Lee S . On-line medical control versus protocol-based prehospital care. Ann Emerg Med. 1997; 30(1):62-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0196-0644(97)70113-6. View

Wuerz R, Swope G, Holliman C . On-line medical direction: a prospective study. Prehosp Disaster Med. 1995; 10(3):174-7. DOI: 10.1017/s1049023x00041960. View

10.

Burstein J, Hollander J, Delagi R, Gold M, Henry M, Alicandro J . Refusal of out-of-hospital medical care: effect of medical-control physician assertiveness on transport rate. Acad Emerg Med. 1998; 5(1):4-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1998.tb02566.x. View

11.

Hoyt B, Norton R . Online medical control and initial refusal of care: does it help to talk with the patient?. Acad Emerg Med. 2001; 8(7):725-30. DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2001.tb00192.x. View

12.

Stuhlmiller D, Cudnik M, Sundheim S, Threlkeld M, Collins Jr T . Adequacy of online medical command communication and emergency medical services documentation of informed refusals. Acad Emerg Med. 2005; 12(10):970-7. DOI: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.06.004. View

13.

Riley J, Burgess R, Schwartz B . Evaluating the impact of an educational intervention on documentation of decision-making capacity in an emergency medical services system. Acad Emerg Med. 2004; 11(7):790-3. DOI: 10.1197/j.aem.2004.01.005. View