» Articles » PMID: 32419614

Developmental Trajectories of Metacognitive Processing and Executive Function from Childhood to Older Age

Overview
Specialties Psychiatry
Psychology
Date 2020 May 19
PMID 32419614
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The modern understanding of the term metacognition encompasses two levels of processing: a lower level or of one's own thoughts and a higher level or of our thinking. Metacognition, therefore, bears conceptual similarity with executive function: both are concerned with top-down monitoring and control of cognition in the service of ongoing goal-directed behaviour. Previous studies have shown a possible executive function advantage in multilingual speakers but also a possible disadvantage in metacognitive processing. To progress theory on metacognitive processing and the relationship with executive function and linguistic experience across the lifespan, we conducted a study testing 330 healthy individuals in four age groups from 7 to 80 years old. All participants performed a metacognition task and two measures of executive function, which included the Simon task and the Tower of London task. Half the participants were multilingual speakers since birth. We built developmental trajectories of metacognitive and executive function across the lifespan. The best metacognitive efficiency was observed in mid-adulthood, whereas the best executive function processing reached its peak in young adulthood. A steep cognitive decline was observed in older age, while metacognitive efficiency was preserved. Exploratory factor analysis indicated that metacognition and executive function are served by different factors across all ages. Contrary to previous findings in the bilingual literature, a multilinguistic experience conferred neither any significant advantage nor disadvantage in both executive function and metacognitive processing across the lifespan.

Citing Articles

A preliminary psychometric evaluation of the activity ordering task with a metacognitive facet (AOT-M).

Jacob N, Rooha A, Nair A, Bajaj G, George V, Bhat J Codas. 2025; 37(3):e20240224.

PMID: 40052965 PMC: 11895772. DOI: 10.1590/2317-1782/e20240224en.


Age-related decreases in global metacognition are independent of local metacognition and task performance.

McWilliams A, Bibby H, Steinbeis N, David A, Fleming S Cognition. 2023; 235:105389.

PMID: 36764048 PMC: 10632679. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105389.


The relationship between response dynamics and the formation of confidence varies across the lifespan.

Overhoff H, Ko Y, Fink G, Stahl J, Weiss P, Bode S Front Aging Neurosci. 2023; 14:969074.

PMID: 36589534 PMC: 9799236. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.969074.


Spanish normative data of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in a community-based sample of adolescents: Datos normativos españoles del Cuestionario de capacidades y dificultades (SDQ) en una muestra comunitaria de adolescentes.

Ortuno-Sierra J, Sebastian-Enesco C, Perez-Albeniz A, Lucas-Molina B, Fonseca-Pedrero E Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2022; 22(3):100328.

PMID: 36111263 PMC: 9442435. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2022.100328.


Age-related differences in visual confidence are driven by individual differences in cognitive control capacities.

Klever L, Mamassian P, Billino J Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):6016.

PMID: 35399123 PMC: 8995367. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-09939-7.


References
1.
Hansson P, Ronnlund M, Juslin P, Nilsson L . Adult age differences in the realism of confidence judgments: overconfidence, format dependence, and cognitive predictors. Psychol Aging. 2008; 23(3):531-44. DOI: 10.1037/a0012782. View

2.
Juslin P, Olsson H . Thurstonian and Brunswikian origins of uncertainty in judgment: a sampling model of confidence in sensory discrimination. Psychol Rev. 1997; 104(2):344-66. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.104.2.344. View

3.
Mueller S, Piper B . The Psychology Experiment Building Language (PEBL) and PEBL Test Battery. J Neurosci Methods. 2013; 222:250-9. PMC: 3897935. DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2013.10.024. View

4.
Rabbitt P, Osman P, Moore B, Stollery B . There are stable individual differences in performance variability, both from moment to moment and from day to day. Q J Exp Psychol A. 2002; 54(4):981-1003. DOI: 10.1080/713756013. View

5.
Hammerer D, Li S, Muller V, Lindenberger U . An electrophysiological study of response conflict processing across the lifespan: assessing the roles of conflict monitoring, cue utilization, response anticipation, and response suppression. Neuropsychologia. 2010; 48(11):3305-16. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.07.014. View