» Articles » PMID: 32415216

Pollinator Divergence and Pollination Isolation Between Hybrids with Different Floral Color and Morphology in Two Sympatric Penstemon Species

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2020 May 17
PMID 32415216
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Differential visitation of pollinators due to divergent floral traits can lead to reproductive isolation via assortative pollen flow, which may ultimately be a driving force in plant speciation, particularly in areas of overlap. We evaluate the effects of pollinator behavioral responses to variation of intraspecific floral color and nectar rewards, on reproductive isolation between two hybrid flower color morphs (fuchsia and blue) and their parental species Penstemon roseus and P. gentianoides with a mixed-pollination system. We show that pollinators (bumblebees and hummingbirds) exhibit different behavioral responses to fuchsia and blue morphs, which could result from differential attraction or deterrence. In addition to differences in color (spectral reflectance), we found that plants with fuchsia flowers produced more and larger flowers, produced more nectar and were more visited by pollinators than those with blue flowers. These differences influenced the foraging behavior and effectiveness as pollinators of both bumblebees and hummingbirds, which contributed to reproductive isolation between the two hybrid flower color morphs and parental species. This study demonstrates how differentiation of pollination traits promotes the formation of hybrid zones leading to pollinator shifts and reproductive isolation. While phenotypic traits of fuchsia and red flowers might encourage more efficient hummingbird pollination in a mixed-pollination system, the costs of bumblebee pollination on plant reproduction could be the drivers for the repeated shifts from bumblebee- to hummingbird-mediated pollination.

Citing Articles

Assessing floral trait variation in () across an elevational gradient.

Plendl M, van der Voort G, Janes J Unknown. 2025; 1(1):63.

PMID: 39758827 PMC: 11698401. DOI: 10.1007/s44372-024-00071-6.


The unique morphological basis and parallel evolutionary history of personate flowers in .

Depatie T, Wessinger C bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39677665 PMC: 11642808. DOI: 10.1101/2024.12.02.626427.


Elevational and Seasonal Patterns of Plant-Hummingbird Interactions in a High Tropical Mountain.

Senties-Aguilar E, Marten-Rodriguez S, Huerta-Ramos G, Diaz-Infante S, Lopez-Segoviano G, Aguirre-Jaimes A Ecol Evol. 2024; 14(10):e70469.

PMID: 39450155 PMC: 11500213. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.70469.


A multiscale approach to understanding the shared blue-orange flower color polymorphism in two Lysimachia species.

Sanchez-Cabrera M, Narbona E, Arista M, Ortiz P, Jimenez-Lopez F, Fuller A BMC Plant Biol. 2024; 24(1):905.

PMID: 39350020 PMC: 11441164. DOI: 10.1186/s12870-024-05481-y.


Local adaptation to hummingbirds and bees in Salvia stachydifolia: insights into pollinator shifts in a Southern Andean sage.

Izquierdo J, Costas S, Castillo S, Baranzelli M, Sazatornil F, Benitez-Vieyra S Ann Bot. 2023; 132(6):1119-1130.

PMID: 37616580 PMC: 10809053. DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcad111.


References
1.
Raven P . WHY ARE BIRD-VISITED FLOWERS PREDOMINANTLY RED?. Evolution. 2017; 26(4):674. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1972.tb01975.x. View

2.
Bradshaw H, Schemske D . Allele substitution at a flower colour locus produces a pollinator shift in monkeyflowers. Nature. 2003; 426(6963):176-8. DOI: 10.1038/nature02106. View

3.
Castellanos M, Wilson P, Keller S, Wolfe A, Thomson J . Anther evolution: pollen presentation strategies when pollinators differ. Am Nat. 2006; 167(2):288-96. DOI: 10.1086/498854. View

4.
Wessinger C, Kelly J . Selfing Can Facilitate Transitions between Pollination Syndromes. Am Nat. 2018; 191(5):582-594. DOI: 10.1086/696856. View

5.
Waelti M, Muhlemann J, Widmer A, Schiestl F . Floral odour and reproductive isolation in two species of Silene. J Evol Biol. 2007; 21(1):111-121. DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2007.01461.x. View