» Articles » PMID: 32412833

Influenza Vaccination Among Dutch General Practitioners and Their Attitude Toward Influenza Vaccination in the Elderly

Overview
Date 2020 May 16
PMID 32412833
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Knowledge, attitudes and beliefs (KABs) toward influenza vaccination (IV) play a key role in HCWs' decisions to receive vaccination and can strongly influence patients' IV uptake. We examined the knowledge, attitudes and beliefs of GPs toward IV, exploring their opinion on IV in the elderly, mandatory HCW vaccination and the desirability of an IV trial in the elderly with hospitalization/mortality as effect measure. From November 2018 to March 2019, surveys were emailed to GPs and GP-practices (n = 1676) in three regions of the Netherlands. We assessed the self-reported IV in GPs, reasons for (not) advising IV to personnel, (not) supporting mandatory IV for personnel and (not) desiring a trial on IV in the elderly on hospitalization/mortality. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to determine predictors for GP IV. A total of 552 surveys were completed and 71.9% of the GPs reported receiving IV. Determinants for IV in GPs were male sex (aOR 1.62, 95%CI 1.06-2.49, = .03) and age ≥60 y (aOR 5.25, 95%CI 1.51-18.32, = .01). Seventy-nine percent of the GPs recommend IV for their practice personnel. Mandatory IV for personnel was supported by 41.2% of the GPs with GP self-reporting IV being the only determinant (aOR 10.03 (95%CI 5.69-17.70 = .00)). An IV trial on hospitalization and/or mortality was desired by 60.5% of the GPs. We concluded that the majority of Dutch GPs receives IV and recommends IV to their personnel. These high rates along with the hesitancy of GPs toward mandatory HCW IV should be considered when policymakers decide on a mandate for IV in HCW in general.

Citing Articles

Low influenza vaccine uptake by healthcare workers caring for the elderly in South African old age homes and primary healthcare facilities.

Sibanda M, Meyer J, Godman B, Burnett R BMC Public Health. 2023; 23(1):91.

PMID: 36635715 PMC: 9834679. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-14926-8.


Understanding Primary Care Physician Vaccination Behaviour: A Systematic Review.

Prieto-Campo A, Garcia-Alvarez R, Lopez-Duran A, Roque F, Herdeiro M, Figueiras A Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(21).

PMID: 36360750 PMC: 9654811. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192113872.


Factors influencing healthcare professionals' confidence in vaccination in Europe: a literature review.

Pavlovic D, Sahoo P, Larson H, Karafillakis E Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2022; 18(1):2041360.

PMID: 35290160 PMC: 9009961. DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2022.2041360.

References
1.
Wicker S, Marckmann G . Vaccination of health care workers against influenza: is it time to think about a mandatory policy in Europe?. Vaccine. 2013; 32(38):4844-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.09.062. View

2.
Petek D, Kamnik-Jug K . Motivators and barriers to vaccination of health professionals against seasonal influenza in primary healthcare. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018; 18(1):853. PMC: 6234642. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-018-3659-8. View

3.
Verhees R, Dondorp W, Thijs C, Dinant G, Knottnerus J . Influenza vaccination in the elderly: Is a trial on mortality ethically acceptable?. Vaccine. 2018; 36(21):2991-2997. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.04.027. View

4.
Collange F, Zaytseva A, Pulcini C, Bocquier A, Verger P . Unexplained variations in general practitioners' perceptions and practices regarding vaccination in France. Eur J Public Health. 2018; 29(1):2-8. DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/cky146. View

5.
Chambers C, Skowronski D, Rose C, De Serres G, Winter A, Dickinson J . Should Sex Be Considered an Effect Modifier in the Evaluation of Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness?. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2018; 5(9):ofy211. PMC: 6143149. DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofy211. View