Craniofacial Photographic Superimposition: New Developments

Overview

Journal Forensic Sci Int Synerg

Specialty Forensic Sciences

Date 2020 May 16

PMID 32411979

Citations 4

Authors

Douglas H Ubelaker

Yaohan Wu

Quinnlan R Cordero

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Craniofacial superimposition is a technique used in the field of forensic anthropology to assist in the analysis of an unknown skull. The process involves superimposing an image of the recovered skull over an ante mortem image of the suspected individual. In the past two decades, there has been a decline in the application due to the development of molecular analysis as a more precise and accurate identification technique. Despite its decrease in use, there has been significant development in superimposition techniques in the past five years, specifically to standardize procedures. One project, MEPROCS (The New Methodologies and Protocols of Forensic Identification by Craniofacial Superimposition), has attempted to establish a framework for solving the problems of past superimposition techniques. Future researchers should consider integrating information gleaned from clinical practices with the statistical and technical advances of craniofacial superimposition for better facilitating its use in forensic anthropology.

Citing Articles

Estimating Maxillary Sinus Volume Using Smartphone Camera.

Meliadis C, Feng E, Johnson E, Zhu W, Gopi P, Mohan V IEEE Open J Eng Med Biol. 2025; 6:256-260.

PMID: 39906271 PMC: 11793482. DOI: 10.1109/OJEMB.2024.3516320.

The Critical Photographic Variables Contributing to Skull-Face Superimposition Methods to Assist Forensic Identification of Skeletons: A Review.

Healy S, Stephan C J Imaging. 2024; 10(1).

PMID: 38249002 PMC: 10817695. DOI: 10.3390/jimaging10010017.

Perspective distortion tolerances and skull-face registration in craniofacial superimposition: an analytical review.

Healy S, Stephan C Int J Legal Med. 2023; 137(6):1767-1776.

PMID: 37702755 PMC: 10567890. DOI: 10.1007/s00414-023-03081-3.

Focus distance estimation from photographed faces: a test of PerspectiveX using 1709 frontal and profile photographs from DSLR and smartphone cameras.

Healy S, Stephan C Int J Legal Med. 2023; 137(6):1907-1920.

PMID: 37702754 PMC: 10567895. DOI: 10.1007/s00414-023-03078-y.

Using Computed Tomography (CT) Data to Build 3D Resources for Forensic Craniofacial Identification.

Simmons-Ehrhardt T, Falsetti C, Falsetti A Adv Exp Med Biol. 2021; 1317:53-74.

PMID: 33945132 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-61125-5_4.

References

Miranda G, Freitas S, Maia L, Melani R . An unusual method of forensic human identification: use of selfie photographs. Forensic Sci Int. 2016; 263:e14-e17. DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.04.028. View

Stephan C . Perspective distortion in craniofacial superimposition: Logarithmic decay curves mapped mathematically and by practical experiment. Forensic Sci Int. 2015; 257:520.e1-520.e8. DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2015.09.009. View

Campomanes-Alvarez B, Ibanez O, Navarro F, Aleman I, Botella M, Damas S . Computer vision and soft computing for automatic skull-face overlay in craniofacial superimposition. Forensic Sci Int. 2014; 245:77-86. DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2014.10.009. View

Gupta A, Kharbanda O, Sardana V, Balachandran R, Sardana H . A knowledge-based algorithm for automatic detection of cephalometric landmarks on CBCT images. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2015; 10(11):1737-52. DOI: 10.1007/s11548-015-1173-6. View

Jayaprakash P, Hashim N, Abd Aziz Mohd Yusop R . Relevance of Whitnall's tubercle and auditory meatus in diagnosing exclusions during skull-photo superimposition. Forensic Sci Int. 2015; 253:131.e1-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2015.04.026. View

Aulsebrook W, Iscan M, Slabbert J, Becker P . Superimposition and reconstruction in forensic facial identification: a survey. Forensic Sci Int. 1995; 75(2-3):101-20. DOI: 10.1016/0379-0738(95)01770-4. View

Lee M, Kanavakis G, Miner R . Newly defined landmarks for a three-dimensionally based cephalometric analysis: a retrospective cone-beam computed tomography scan review. Angle Orthod. 2014; 85(1):3-10. PMC: 8634809. DOI: 10.2319/021814-120.1. View

Ibanez O, Vicente R, Navega D, Campomanes-Alvarez C, Cattaneo C, Jankauskas R . MEPROCS framework for Craniofacial Superimposition: Validation study. Leg Med (Tokyo). 2016; 23:99-108. DOI: 10.1016/j.legalmed.2016.10.007. View

Damas S, Wilkinson C, Kahana T, Veselovskaya E, Abramov A, Jankauskas R . Study on the performance of different craniofacial superimposition approaches (II): Best practices proposal. Forensic Sci Int. 2015; 257:504-508. DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2015.07.045. View

10.

Ibanez O, Valsecchi A, Cavalli F, Huete M, Campomanes-Alvarez B, Campomanes-Alvarez C . Study on the criteria for assessing skull-face correspondence in craniofacial superimposition. Leg Med (Tokyo). 2016; 23:59-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.legalmed.2016.09.009. View

11.

Mallett X, Evison M . Forensic facial comparison: issues of admissibility in the development of novel analytical technique. J Forensic Sci. 2013; 58(4):859-65. DOI: 10.1111/1556-4029.12127. View

12.

Ubelaker D . Craniofacial Superimposition: Historical Review and Current Issues. J Forensic Sci. 2015; 60(6):1412-9. DOI: 10.1111/1556-4029.12842. View

13.

Weissheimer A, Menezes L, Koerich L, Pham J, Cevidanes L . Fast three-dimensional superimposition of cone beam computed tomography for orthopaedics and orthognathic surgery evaluation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015; 44(9):1188-96. PMC: 4526318. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2015.04.001. View

14.

Stephan C, Caple J, Guyomarch P, Claes P . An overview of the latest developments in facial imaging. Forensic Sci Res. 2019; 4(1):10-28. PMC: 6427692. DOI: 10.1080/20961790.2018.1519892. View

15.

Almukhtar A, Ju X, Khambay B, McDonald J, Ayoub A . Comparison of the accuracy of voxel based registration and surface based registration for 3D assessment of surgical change following orthognathic surgery. PLoS One. 2014; 9(4):e93402. PMC: 3973674. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093402. View

16.

Stephan C, Huang A, Davidson P . Further evidence on the anatomical placement of the human eyeball for facial approximation and craniofacial superimposition. J Forensic Sci. 2009; 54(2):267-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2008.00982.x. View

17.

Huete M, Ibanez O, Wilkinson C, Kahana T . Past, present, and future of craniofacial superimposition: Literature and international surveys. Leg Med (Tokyo). 2015; 17(4):267-78. DOI: 10.1016/j.legalmed.2015.02.001. View

18.

Jayaprakash P . Conceptual transitions in methods of skull-photo superimposition that impact the reliability of identification: a review. Forensic Sci Int. 2014; 246:110-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2014.10.043. View

19.

Lorkiewicz-Muszynska D, Kociemba W, Zaba C, Labecka M, Koralewska-Kordel M, Abreu-Glowacka M . The conclusive role of postmortem computed tomography (CT) of the skull and computer-assisted superimposition in identification of an unknown body. Int J Legal Med. 2012; 127(3):653-60. PMC: 3631520. DOI: 10.1007/s00414-012-0805-4. View

20.

Stephan C, Preisler R . In vivo facial soft tissue thicknesses of adult Australians. Forensic Sci Int. 2017; 282:220.e1-220.e12. DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.11.014. View