Effect of Aging and Body Characteristics on Facial Sexual Dimorphism in the Caucasian Population

Overview

Journal PLoS One

Specialties General Medicine
Science

Date 2020 May 15

PMID 32407322

Citations 12

Authors

Zala Skomina

Miha Verdenik

Natasa Ihan Hren

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to quantify gender-specific facial characteristics in younger and older adults and to determine how aging and body characteristics, such as height and body-mass index (BMI), influence facial sexual dimorphism.

Methods: The cohort study included 90 younger adults of Caucasian origin (average age of 45 females 23.2 ± 1.9 and 45 males 23.7 ± 2.4 years) and 90 older adults (average age of 49 females 78.1 ± 8.1 and 41 males 74.5 ± 7.7 years). Three-dimensional facial scans were performed with an Artec MHT 3D scanner. The data were analyzed using the software package Rapidform®. The parameters to evaluate facial symmetry, height, width, profile, facial shape, nose, eyes and mouth characteristics were determined based on 39 facial landmarks. Student's t-test was used to calculate the statistical differences between the genders in the younger and older adults and a multiple-linear-regression analysis was used to evaluate the impact of gender, age, body-mass index and body height.

Results: We found that the female faces were more symmetrical than the male faces, and this was statistically significant in the older adults. The female facial shape was more rounded and their faces were smaller, after normalizing for body size. The males had wider mouths, longer upper lips, larger noses and more prominent lower foreheads. Surprisingly, we found that all the gender-dependent characteristics were even more pronounced in the older adults. Increased facial asymmetry, decreased facial convexity, increased forehead angle, narrower vermilions and longer inter-eye distances occurred in both genders during aging. An increased BMI was associated with wider faces, more concave facial profiles and wider noses, while greater body height correlated with increased facial heights and wider mouths.

Conclusion: Facial sexual dimorphism was confirmed by multiple parameters in our study, while the differences between the genders were more pronounced in the older adults.

Citing Articles

Three-Dimensional Geometric Morphometric Characterization of Facial Sexual Dimorphism in Juveniles.

Solazzo R, Cappella A, Gibelli D, Dolci C, Tartaglia G, Sforza C Diagnostics (Basel). 2025; 15(3).

PMID: 39941324 PMC: 11817074. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics15030395.

An Anthropometric Study of the Morphologic Facial Index of Tibetan Youth in Tibet.

Zhong H, Tong Q J Craniofac Surg. 2024; 35(2):490-494.

PMID: 39445908 PMC: 10880939. DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000009766.

Midface Skeletal Sexual Dimorphism: Lessons Learned from Advanced Three-dimensional Imaging in the White Population.

Abushehab A, Rames J, Hussein S, Meire Pazelli A, Sears T, Wentworth A Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024; 12(10):e6215.

PMID: 39386100 PMC: 11463203. DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006215.

The Concept of Ideal Lips of Caucasian Female: An Anthropometric Analysis of the Lower Third of the Face.

Winiarska N, Roszkowski B, Paskal W, Majak M, Pietruski P Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024; 49(1):20-30.

PMID: 39198279 PMC: 11799052. DOI: 10.1007/s00266-024-04299-1.

Stereophotometric facial changes in edentulous older adults after rehabilitation with complete dentures.

Skomina Z, Kuhar M, Verdenik M, Ihan Hren N Gerodontology. 2024; 42(1):100-109.

PMID: 38988093 PMC: 11870634. DOI: 10.1111/ger.12774.

References

Kramer R, Jones A, Ward R . A lack of sexual dimorphism in width-to-height ratio in white European faces using 2D photographs, 3D scans, and anthropometry. PLoS One. 2012; 7(8):e42705. PMC: 3413652. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042705. View

Little A, Jones B, Waitt C, Tiddeman B, Feinberg D, Perrett D . Symmetry is related to sexual dimorphism in faces: data across culture and species. PLoS One. 2008; 3(5):e2106. PMC: 2329856. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002106. View

Habal M . Aesthetics of feminizing the male face by craniofacial contouring of the facial bones. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1990; 14(2):143-50. DOI: 10.1007/BF01578340. View

Menendez Lopez-Mateos M, Carreno-Carreno J, Palma J, Alarcon J, Menendez Lopez-Mateos C, Menendez-Nunez M . Three-dimensional photographic analysis of the face in European adults from southern Spain with normal occlusion: reference anthropometric measurements. BMC Oral Health. 2019; 19(1):196. PMC: 6714104. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-019-0898-y. View

Pelin C, Zagyapan R, Yazici C, Kurkcuoglu A . Body height estimation from head and face dimensions: a different method. J Forensic Sci. 2010; 55(5):1326-30. DOI: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2010.01429.x. View

Toriumi D . Surgical correction of the aging nose. Facial Plast Surg. 1996; 12(2):205-14. DOI: 10.1055/s-0028-1082411. View

Angelopoulou R, Lavranos G, Manolakou P . Establishing sexual dimorphism in humans. Coll Antropol. 2006; 30(3):653-8. View

Djordjevic J, Toma A, Zhurov A, Richmond S . Three-dimensional quantification of facial symmetry in adolescents using laser surface scanning. Eur J Orthod. 2011; 36(2):125-32. PMC: 3969526. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjr091. View

Koehler N, Simmons L, Rhodes G, Peters M . The relationship between sexual dimorphism in human faces and fluctuating asymmetry. Proc Biol Sci. 2004; 271 Suppl 4:S233-6. PMC: 1810020. DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2003.0146. View

10.

Mendelson B, Wong C . Changes in the facial skeleton with aging: implications and clinical applications in facial rejuvenation. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2012; 36(4):753-60. PMC: 3404279. DOI: 10.1007/s00266-012-9904-3. View

11.

Bishara S, Burkey P, Kharouf J . Dental and facial asymmetries: a review. Angle Orthod. 1994; 64(2):89-98. DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(1994)064<0089:DAFAAR>2.0.CO;2. View

12.

Zacharopoulos G, Manios A, Kau C, Velagrakis G, N Tzanakakis G, de Bree E . Anthropometric Analysis of the Face. J Craniofac Surg. 2015; 27(1):e71-5. DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000002231. View

13.

Rongo R, Antoun J, Lim Y, Dias G, Valletta R, Farella M . Three-dimensional evaluation of the relationship between jaw divergence and facial soft tissue dimensions. Angle Orthod. 2014; 84(5):788-94. PMC: 8641260. DOI: 10.2319/092313-699.1. View

14.

Chiu C, CLARK R . Reproducibility of natural head position. J Dent. 1991; 19(2):130-1. DOI: 10.1016/0300-5712(91)90111-b. View

15.

Grammer K, Thornhill R . Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness and sexual selection: the role of symmetry and averageness. J Comp Psychol. 1994; 108(3):233-42. DOI: 10.1037/0735-7036.108.3.233. View

16.

Rhodes G, Yoshikawa S, Palermo R, Simmons L, Peters M, Lee K . Perceived health contributes to the attractiveness of facial symmetry, averageness, and sexual dimorphism. Perception. 2007; 36(8):1244-52. DOI: 10.1068/p5712. View

17.

Dixson B, Sulikowski D, Gouda-Vossos A, Rantala M, Brooks R . The masculinity paradox: facial masculinity and beardedness interact to determine women's ratings of men's facial attractiveness. J Evol Biol. 2016; 29(11):2311-2320. DOI: 10.1111/jeb.12958. View

18.

Raschke G, Rieger U, Bader R, Schaefer O, Guentsch A, Dammeier M . Perioral aging--an anthropometric appraisal. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2013; 42(5):e312-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2013.10.012. View

19.

Komori M, Kawamura S, Ishihara S . Effect of averageness and sexual dimorphism on the judgment of facial attractiveness. Vision Res. 2009; 49(8):862-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2009.03.005. View

20.

Farkas L, Katic M, Forrest C, Alt K, Bagic I, Baltadjiev G . International anthropometric study of facial morphology in various ethnic groups/races. J Craniofac Surg. 2005; 16(4):615-46. DOI: 10.1097/01.scs.0000171847.58031.9e. View