A Unified Dinucleotide Alphabet Describing Both RNA and DNA Structures

Overview

Journal Nucleic Acids Res

Publisher Oxford University Press

Specialty Biochemistry

Date 2020 May 15

PMID 32406923

Citations 18

Authors

Jiri cerny

Paulina Bozikova

Jakub Svoboda

Bohdan Schneider

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

By analyzing almost 120 000 dinucleotides in over 2000 nonredundant nucleic acid crystal structures, we define 96+1 diNucleotide Conformers, NtCs, which describe the geometry of RNA and DNA dinucleotides. NtC classes are grouped into 15 codes of the structural alphabet CANA (Conformational Alphabet of Nucleic Acids) to simplify symbolic annotation of the prominent structural features of NAs and their intuitive graphical display. The search for nontrivial patterns of NtCs resulted in the identification of several types of RNA loops, some of them observed for the first time. Over 30% of the nearly six million dinucleotides in the PDB cannot be assigned to any NtC class but we demonstrate that up to a half of them can be re-refined with the help of proper refinement targets. A statistical analysis of the preferences of NtCs and CANA codes for the 16 dinucleotide sequences showed that neither the NtC class AA00, which forms the scaffold of RNA structures, nor BB00, the DNA most populated class, are sequence neutral but their distributions are significantly biased. The reported automated assignment of the NtC classes and CANA codes available at dnatco.org provides a powerful tool for unbiased analysis of nucleic acid structures by structural and molecular biologists.

Citing Articles

Has AlphaFold3 achieved success for RNA?.

Bernard C, Postic G, Ghannay S, Tahi F Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol. 2025; 81(Pt 2):49-62.

PMID: 39868559 PMC: 11804252. DOI: 10.1107/S2059798325000592.

Refinement of the Sugar Puckering Torsion Potential in the AMBER DNA Force Field.

Zgarbova M, Sponer J, Jurecka P J Chem Theory Comput. 2025; 21(2):833-846.

PMID: 39748297 PMC: 11780733. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.4c01100.

RNAtango: Analysing and comparing RNA 3D structures via torsional angles.

Mackowiak M, Adamczyk B, Szachniuk M, Zok T PLoS Comput Biol. 2024; 20(10):e1012500.

PMID: 39374268 PMC: 11486365. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012500.

PTFSpot: deep co-learning on transcription factors and their binding regions attains impeccable universality in plants.

Gupta S, Kesarwani V, Bhati U, Jyoti , Shankar R Brief Bioinform. 2024; 25(4).

PMID: 39013383 PMC: 11250369. DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbae324.

Outcomes of the EMDataResource cryo-EM Ligand Modeling Challenge.

Lawson C, Kryshtafovych A, Pintilie G, Burley S, cerny J, Chen V Nat Methods. 2024; 21(7):1340-1348.

PMID: 38918604 PMC: 11526832. DOI: 10.1038/s41592-024-02321-7.

References

Flygaard R, Boegholm N, Yusupov M, Jenner L . Cryo-EM structure of the hibernating Thermus thermophilus 100S ribosome reveals a protein-mediated dimerization mechanism. Nat Commun. 2018; 9(1):4179. PMC: 6177447. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-06724-x. View

Garreau de Loubresse N, Prokhorova I, Holtkamp W, Rodnina M, Yusupova G, Yusupov M . Structural basis for the inhibition of the eukaryotic ribosome. Nature. 2014; 513(7519):517-22. DOI: 10.1038/nature13737. View

Sussman D, Wilson C . A water channel in the core of the vitamin B(12) RNA aptamer. Structure. 2000; 8(7):719-27. DOI: 10.1016/s0969-2126(00)00159-3. View

Ben-Shem A, Garreau de Loubresse N, Melnikov S, Jenner L, Yusupova G, Yusupov M . The structure of the eukaryotic ribosome at 3.0 Å resolution. Science. 2011; 334(6062):1524-9. DOI: 10.1126/science.1212642. View

Desai N, Brown A, Amunts A, Ramakrishnan V . The structure of the yeast mitochondrial ribosome. Science. 2017; 355(6324):528-531. PMC: 5295643. DOI: 10.1126/science.aal2415. View

Harrison A, South D, Willett P, Artymiuk P . Representation, searching and discovery of patterns of bases in complex RNA structures. J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2004; 17(8):537-49. DOI: 10.1023/b:jcam.0000004603.15856.32. View

Chojnowski G, Walen T, Bujnicki J . RNA Bricks--a database of RNA 3D motifs and their interactions. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013; 42(Database issue):D123-31. PMC: 3965019. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkt1084. View

Duarte C, Wadley L, Pyle A . RNA structure comparison, motif search and discovery using a reduced representation of RNA conformational space. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003; 31(16):4755-61. PMC: 169959. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkg682. View

Edwards A, Reyes F, Heroux A, Batey R . Structural basis for recognition of S-adenosylhomocysteine by riboswitches. RNA. 2010; 16(11):2144-55. PMC: 2957054. DOI: 10.1261/rna.2341610. View

10.

Chen V, Arendall 3rd W, Headd J, Keedy D, Immormino R, Kapral G . MolProbity: all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2010; 66(Pt 1):12-21. PMC: 2803126. DOI: 10.1107/S0907444909042073. View

11.

Huang L, Wang J, Lilley D . The Structure of the Guanidine-II Riboswitch. Cell Chem Biol. 2017; 24(6):695-702.e2. PMC: 5486947. DOI: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2017.05.014. View

12.

Konagurthu A, Lesk A, Allison L . Minimum message length inference of secondary structure from protein coordinate data. Bioinformatics. 2012; 28(12):i97-105. PMC: 3371855. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts223. View

13.

Zhong C, Tang H, Zhang S . RNAMotifScan: automatic identification of RNA structural motifs using secondary structural alignment. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010; 38(18):e176. PMC: 2952876. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkq672. View

14.

Gaines C, Piccirilli J, York D . The L-platform/L-scaffold framework: a blueprint for RNA-cleaving nucleic acid enzyme design. RNA. 2019; 26(2):111-125. PMC: 6961537. DOI: 10.1261/rna.071894.119. View

15.

Liu H, Yu X, Chen Y, Zhang J, Wu B, Zheng L . Crystal structure of an RNA-cleaving DNAzyme. Nat Commun. 2017; 8(1):2006. PMC: 5722873. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-02203-x. View

16.

Gilski M, Drozdzal P, Kierzek R, Jaskolski M . Atomic resolution structure of a chimeric DNA-RNA Z-type duplex in complex with Ba(2+) ions: a case of complicated multi-domain twinning. Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol. 2016; 72(Pt 2):211-23. DOI: 10.1107/S2059798315024365. View

17.

Joseph A, Agarwal G, Mahajan S, Gelly J, Swapna L, Offmann B . A short survey on protein blocks. Biophys Rev. 2011; 2(3):137-147. PMC: 3124139. DOI: 10.1007/s12551-010-0036-1. View

18.

Ito K, Murakami R, Mochizuki M, Qi H, Shimizu Y, Miura K . Structural basis for the substrate recognition and catalysis of peptidyl-tRNA hydrolase. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012; 40(20):10521-31. PMC: 3488237. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gks790. View

19.

Schmeing T, Huang K, Kitchen D, Strobel S, Steitz T . Structural insights into the roles of water and the 2' hydroxyl of the P site tRNA in the peptidyl transferase reaction. Mol Cell. 2005; 20(3):437-48. DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2005.09.006. View

20.

Schneider B, Bozikova P, cech P, Svozil D, cerny J . A DNA Structural Alphabet Distinguishes Structural Features of DNA Bound to Regulatory Proteins and in the Nucleosome Core Particle. Genes (Basel). 2017; 8(10). PMC: 5664128. DOI: 10.3390/genes8100278. View