EBreCaP: Extreme Learning-based Model for Breast Cancer Survival Prediction

Overview

Journal IET Syst Biol

Publisher Wiley

Specialty Biology

Date 2020 May 15

PMID 32406380

Citations 6

Authors

Arwinder Dhillon

Ashima Singh

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Breast cancer is the second leading cause of death in the world. Breast cancer research is focused towards its early prediction, diagnosis, and prognosis. Breast cancer can be predicted on omics profiles, clinical tests, and pathological images. The omics profiles comprise of genomic, proteomic, and transcriptomic profiles that are available as high-dimensional datasets. Survival prediction is carried out on omics data to predict early the onset of disease, relapse, reoccurrence of diseases, and biomarker identification. The early prediction of breast cancer is desired for the effective treatment of patients as delay can aggravate the staging of cancer. In this study, extreme learning machine (ELM) based model for breast cancer survival prediction named eBreCaP is proposed. It integrates the genomic (gene expression, copy number alteration, DNA methylation, protein expression) and pathological image datasets; and trains them using an ensemble of ELM with the six best-chosen models suitable to be applied on integrated data. eBreCaP has been evaluated on nine performance parameters, namely sensitivity, specificity, precision, accuracy, Matthews correlation coefficient, area under curve, area under precision-recall, hazard ratio, and concordance Index. eBreCaP has achieved an accuracy of 85% for early breast cancer survival prediction using the ensemble of ELM with gradient boosting.

Citing Articles

Comparative analysis of features and classification techniques in breast cancer detection for Biglycan biomarker images.

Matouq J, Alnuman N Cancer Biomark. 2024; 40(3-4):263-273.

PMID: 39177590 PMC: 11380270. DOI: 10.3233/CBM-230544.

Publicly available datasets of breast histopathology H&E whole-slide images: A scoping review.

Tafavvoghi M, Bongo L, Shvetsov N, Rasmussen Busund L, Mollersen K J Pathol Inform. 2024; 15:100363.

PMID: 38405160 PMC: 10884505. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpi.2024.100363.

FGCNSurv: dually fused graph convolutional network for multi-omics survival prediction.

Wen G, Li L Bioinformatics. 2023; 39(8).

PMID: 37522887 PMC: 10412406. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btad472.

The research on TBATS and ELM models for prediction of human brucellosis cases in mainland China: a time series study.

Zhao D, Zhang H BMC Infect Dis. 2022; 22(1):934.

PMID: 36510150 PMC: 9746081. DOI: 10.1186/s12879-022-07919-w.

Software system to predict the infection in COVID-19 patients using deep learning and web of things.

Singh A, Kaur A, Dhillon A, Ahuja S, Vohra H Softw Pract Exp. 2021; 52(4):868-886.

PMID: 34538962 PMC: 8441673. DOI: 10.1002/spe.3011.

References

Tabl A, Alkhateeb A, ElMaraghy W, Rueda L, Ngom A . A Machine Learning Approach for Identifying Gene Biomarkers Guiding the Treatment of Breast Cancer. Front Genet. 2019; 10:256. PMC: 6446069. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00256. View

Wang Z, Wang C . Buckley-James boosting for survival analysis with high-dimensional biomarker data. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol. 2010; 9:Article24. PMC: 2904263. DOI: 10.2202/1544-6115.1550. View

J van t Veer L, Dai H, van de Vijver M, He Y, Hart A, Mao M . Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer. Nature. 2002; 415(6871):530-6. DOI: 10.1038/415530a. View

Ching T, Himmelstein D, Beaulieu-Jones B, Kalinin A, Do B, Way G . Opportunities and obstacles for deep learning in biology and medicine. J R Soc Interface. 2018; 15(141). PMC: 5938574. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2017.0387. View

Hung F, Chiu H . Cancer subtype prediction from a pathway-level perspective by using a support vector machine based on integrated gene expression and protein network. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2017; 141:27-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2017.01.006. View

C Silva T, Colaprico A, Olsen C, DAngelo F, Bontempi G, Ceccarelli M . : Analyze cancer genomics and epigenomics data using Bioconductor packages. F1000Res. 2017; 5:1542. PMC: 5302158. DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.8923.2. View

Jin B, Li Y, Robertson K . DNA methylation: superior or subordinate in the epigenetic hierarchy?. Genes Cancer. 2011; 2(6):607-17. PMC: 3174260. DOI: 10.1177/1947601910393957. View

Biganzoli E, Boracchi P, Mariani L, Marubini E . Feed forward neural networks for the analysis of censored survival data: a partial logistic regression approach. Stat Med. 1998; 17(10):1169-86. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19980530)17:10<1169::aid-sim796>3.0.co;2-d. View

Sun D, Wang M, Li A . A multimodal deep neural network for human breast cancer prognosis prediction by integrating multi-dimensional data. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform. 2018; . DOI: 10.1109/TCBB.2018.2806438. View

10.

Jiang Y, Chen L, Zhang H, Xiao X . Breast cancer histopathological image classification using convolutional neural networks with small SE-ResNet module. PLoS One. 2019; 14(3):e0214587. PMC: 6440620. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214587. View

11.

Redon R, Ishikawa S, Fitch K, Feuk L, Perry G, Andrews T . Global variation in copy number in the human genome. Nature. 2006; 444(7118):444-54. PMC: 2669898. DOI: 10.1038/nature05329. View

12.

Tao M, Song T, Du W, Han S, Zuo C, Li Y . Classifying Breast Cancer Subtypes Using Multiple Kernel Learning Based on Omics Data. Genes (Basel). 2019; 10(3). PMC: 6471546. DOI: 10.3390/genes10030200. View

13.

Guo W, Li H, Zhu Y, Lan L, Yang S, Drukker K . Prediction of clinical phenotypes in invasive breast carcinomas from the integration of radiomics and genomics data. J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2016; 2(4):041007. PMC: 4718467. DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.2.4.041007. View

14.

Vazquez A, Veturi Y, Behring M, Shrestha S, Kirst M, Resende Jr M . Increased Proportion of Variance Explained and Prediction Accuracy of Survival of Breast Cancer Patients with Use of Whole-Genome Multiomic Profiles. Genetics. 2016; 203(3):1425-38. PMC: 4937492. DOI: 10.1534/genetics.115.185181. View

15.

Wang H, Li G . Extreme learning machine Cox model for high-dimensional survival analysis. Stat Med. 2019; 38(12):2139-2156. PMC: 6498851. DOI: 10.1002/sim.8090. View

16.

Cox B, Kislinger T, Emili A . Integrating gene and protein expression data: pattern analysis and profile mining. Methods. 2005; 35(3):303-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2004.08.021. View

17.

Sun D, Li A, Tang B, Wang M . Integrating genomic data and pathological images to effectively predict breast cancer clinical outcome. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2018; 161:45-53. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2018.04.008. View

18.

Prat A, Fan C, Fernandez A, Hoadley K, Martinello R, Vidal M . Response and survival of breast cancer intrinsic subtypes following multi-agent neoadjuvant chemotherapy. BMC Med. 2015; 13:303. PMC: 4683815. DOI: 10.1186/s12916-015-0540-z. View

19.

Huang G, Chen L, Siew C . Universal approximation using incremental constructive feedforward networks with random hidden nodes. IEEE Trans Neural Netw. 2006; 17(4):879-892. DOI: 10.1109/TNN.2006.875977. View

20.

Gevaert O, De Smet F, Timmerman D, Moreau Y, De Moor B . Predicting the prognosis of breast cancer by integrating clinical and microarray data with Bayesian networks. Bioinformatics. 2006; 22(14):e184-90. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl230. View