» Articles » PMID: 32404136

LMA® Gastro™ Airway for Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: a Retrospective Observational Analysis

Overview
Journal BMC Anesthesiol
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Anesthesiology
Date 2020 May 15
PMID 32404136
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Various airway techniques have been employed for endoscopic procedures, with an aim to optimise patient outcomes by improving airway control and preventing hypoxia whilst avoiding the need for intubation. The LMA® Gastro™ Airway, a novel dual channel supraglottic airway technique, has been described as such a device. Its utility alongside sedation with low flow nasal cannula and general anaesthesia (GA) with intubation for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) procedures was evaluated.

Methods: Details of all the ERCPs performed in our institution from March 2017 to June 2018 were carefully recorded in the patients' electronic case records. Data on the successful completion of ERCP through LMA® Gastro™ Airway; any difficulty encountered by the gastroenterologists; and adverse events were recorded. Episodes of hypoxia (SpO < 92%) and haemodynamic parameters were compared across the three groups: LMA® Gastro™ vs. sedation with low flow nasal cannula vs. GA with an endotracheal tube (ETT).

Results: One hundred seventy-seven ERCP procedures were performed during the study period. The LMA® Gastro™ Airway was employed in 64 procedures (36%) on 59 patients. Of these 64 procedures, ERCP was successfully completed with LMA® Gastro™ Airway in 63 (98%) instances, with only one case requiring conversion to an endotracheal tube. This instance followed difficulty in negotiating the endoscope through LMA® Gastro™ Airway. No episodes of hypoxia or hypercapnia were documented in both LMA® Gastro™ and GA with ETT groups. One sedation case with nasal cannula was noted to have hypoxia. Adverse intraoperative events were recognised in 2 cases of LMA® Gastro™: one had minimal blood stained secretions from the oral cavity that resolved with suctioning; the other developed mild laryngospasm which resolved spontaneously within a few minutes.

Conclusion: In patients undergoing ERCP, the LMA® Gastro™ airway demonstrated a high success rate for ERCP completion. Ventilation was well maintained with minimal intraoperative and postoperative adverse events. This technique may have a role in higher risk groups such as high ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) status, or those with potential airway difficulties such as high body mass index and those with known or suspected sleep apnoea.

Citing Articles

A new device, LMA Gastro™, on the horizon for endoscopy procedures: A narrative review.

Gupta A, Saranlal A, Gupta N J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2025; 40(4):564-573.

PMID: 39759034 PMC: 11694854. DOI: 10.4103/joacp.joacp_231_23.


Assessment of the application of double-modified nasopharyngeal airways versus the use of low-flow nasal cannula during pediatric upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: A prospective, randomized, noninferiority, controlled trial.

Hussein M, Amer A, Maarouf M J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2024; 40(3):403-409.

PMID: 39391647 PMC: 11463950. DOI: 10.4103/joacp.joacp_113_23.


Supraglottic jet oxygenation and ventilation improves oxygenation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Su D, Zhang W, Li J, Tan X, Wei H, Wang Y BMC Anesthesiol. 2024; 24(1):21.

PMID: 38216874 PMC: 10785419. DOI: 10.1186/s12871-024-02406-y.


Comparison of the Jcerity endoscoper airway and the endotracheal tube in endoscopic esophageal variceal ligation: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Zhang L, Li L, Wang J, Zhao C, Zhao E, Li Y Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):11849.

PMID: 37481684 PMC: 10363148. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-39086-6.


Recovery time in target controlled infusion versus manual infusion of propofol in total intravenous anaesthesia for endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography procedure using laryngeal mask airway-gastro: A randomised comparative study.

Sahu A, Tripathy D, Gupta B, Talawar P, Gupta R Indian J Anaesth. 2023; 67(Suppl 2):S120-S125.

PMID: 37122939 PMC: 10132675. DOI: 10.4103/ija.ija_484_22.


References
1.
Daskaya H, Uysal H, Ciftci T, Baysal B, Idin K, Karaaslan K . Use of the gastro-laryngeal tube in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography cases under sedation/analgesia. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2016; 27(3):246-51. DOI: 10.5152/tjg.2016.16121. View

2.
Stone A, Brovman E, Greenberg P, Urman R . A medicolegal analysis of malpractice claims involving anesthesiologists in the gastrointestinal endoscopy suite (2007-2016). J Clin Anesth. 2018; 48:15-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.04.007. View

3.
Cai G, Huang Z, Zou T, He M, Wang S, Huang P . Clinical application of a novel endoscopic mask: A randomized controlled trial in aged patients undergoing painless gastroscopy. Int J Med Sci. 2017; 14(2):167-172. PMC: 5332846. DOI: 10.7150/ijms.16919. View

4.
Fabbri C, Luigiano C, Cennamo V, Polifemo A, Maimone A, Jovine E . The Gastro-Laryngeal Tube for interventional endoscopic biliopancreatic procedures in anesthetized patients. Endoscopy. 2012; 44(11):1051-4. DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1310159. View

5.
de Paulo G, Martins F, Macedo E, Goncalves M, Mourao C, Ferrari A . Sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy: a prospective study comparing nonanesthesiologist-administered propofol and monitored anesthesia care. Endosc Int Open. 2015; 3(1):E7-E13. PMC: 4423250. DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1377835. View