» Articles » PMID: 32401762

The Improved and the Unimproved: Factors Influencing Sanitation and Diarrhoea in a Peri-urban Settlement of Lusaka, Zambia

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2020 May 14
PMID 32401762
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Accounting for peri-urban sanitation poses a unique challenge due to its high density, unplanned stature, with limited space and funding for conventional sanitation instalment. To better understand users, needs and inform peri-urban sanitation policy, our study used multivariate stepwise logistic regression to assess the factors associated with use of improved (toilet) and unimproved (chamber) sanitation facilities among peri-urban residents. We analysed data from 205 household heads in 1 peri-urban settlement of Lusaka, Zambia on socio-demographics (economic status, education level, marital status, etc.), household sanitation characteristics (toilet facility, ownership and management) and household diarrhoea prevalence. Household water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) facilities were assessed based on WHO-UNICEF criteria. Of particular interest was the simultaneous use of toilet facilities and chambers, an alternative form of unimproved sanitation with focus towards all-in-one suitable alternatives. Findings revealed that having a regular income, private toilet facility, improved drinking water and handwashing facility were all positively correlated to having an improved toilet facility. Interestingly, both improved toilets and chambers indicated increased odds for diarrhoea prevalence. Odds of chamber usage were also higher for females and users of unimproved toilet facilities. Moreover, when toilets were owned by residents, and hygiene was managed externally, use of chambers was more likely. Findings finally revealed higher diarrhoea prevalence for toilets with more users. Results highlight the need for a holistic, simultaneous approach to WASH for overall success in sanitation. To better access and increase peri-urban sanitation, this study recommends a separate sanitation ladder for high density areas which considers improved private and shared facilities, toilet management and all-inclusive usage (cancelling unimproved alternatives). It further calls for financial plans supporting urban poor access to basic sanitation and increased education on toilet facility models, hygiene, management and risk to help with choice and proper facility use to maximize toilet use benefit.

Citing Articles

Achieving universal sanitation in Ghana: An analysis of key drivers of toilet ownership among property owners in Urban areas.

Duku G, Bonso N, Appiah-Effah E, Kunkuaboor Y, Nouwati E, Gyapong-Korsah B PLoS One. 2025; 20(1):e0307729.

PMID: 39820150 PMC: 11737778. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307729.


Spatial distribution and determinants of improved shared sanitation facilities among households in Ethiopia: Using 2019 mini-Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey.

Amlak B, Belay D PLoS One. 2025; 20(1):e0315860.

PMID: 39804838 PMC: 11730421. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315860.


Hygiene practice and diarrhea prevalence among underfive children in Myanmar: a cross-sectional study.

Soe T, Laohasiriwong W, Sornlorm K, Mahato R BMC Pediatr. 2024; 24(1):675.

PMID: 39443847 PMC: 11520161. DOI: 10.1186/s12887-024-05158-3.


Determinants of Basic Sanitation Service Coverage Among Households in Shashogo District, Hadiya Zone, Central Ethiopia: A Case Control Study.

Tefera T, Alemu T, Alano A Environ Health Insights. 2024; 18:11786302241282378.

PMID: 39315005 PMC: 11418298. DOI: 10.1177/11786302241282378.


Application of a Novel Proteomic Microarray Reveals High Exposure to Diarrhoeagenic among Children in Zambia Participating in a Phase I Clinical Trial.

Mwape K, Mubanga C, Chilyabanyama O, Chibesa K, Chisenga C, Silwamba S Microorganisms. 2024; 12(3).

PMID: 38543471 PMC: 10972023. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms12030420.


References
1.
Pickering A, Djebbari H, Lopez C, Coulibaly M, Alzua M . Effect of a community-led sanitation intervention on child diarrhoea and child growth in rural Mali: a cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet Glob Health. 2015; 3(11):e701-11. DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X(15)00144-8. View

2.
Kapata N, Sinyange N, Mazaba M, Musonda K, Hamoonga R, Kapina M . A Multisectoral Emergency Response Approach to a Cholera Outbreak in Zambia: October 2017-February 2018. J Infect Dis. 2018; 218(suppl_3):S181-S183. PMC: 6188535. DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiy490. View

3.
Yogananth N, Bhatnagar T . Prevalence of open defecation among households with toilets and associated factors in rural south India: an analytical cross-sectional study. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2018; 112(7):349-360. DOI: 10.1093/trstmh/try064. View

4.
Bhatt N, Budhathoki S, Lucero-Prisno D, Shrestha G, Bhattachan M, Thapa J . What motivates open defecation? A qualitative study from a rural setting in Nepal. PLoS One. 2019; 14(7):e0219246. PMC: 6602253. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219246. View

5.
Bhandari P, Bak J, Lee K, Chon Y, Bhattachan A, Rimal P . Assessment of Socio-Demographic Factors, Mother and Child Health Status, Water, Sanitation, and Hygienic Conditions Existing in a Hilly Rural Village of Nepal. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019; 16(20). PMC: 6843700. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16203965. View