» Articles » PMID: 32393313

Engaging with Stakeholders to Inform the Development of a Decision-support Tool for the NHS Health Check Programme: Qualitative Study

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Health Services
Date 2020 May 13
PMID 32393313
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The NHS Health Check Programme is a risk-reduction programme offered to all adults in England aged 40-74 years. Previous studies mainly focused on patient perspectives and programme delivery; however, delivery varies, and costs are substantial. We were therefore working with key stakeholders to develop and co-produce an NHS Health Check Programme modelling tool (workHORSE) for commissioners to quantify local effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and equity. Here we report on Workshop 1, which specifically aimed to facilitate engagement with stakeholders; develop a shared understanding of current Health Check implementation; identify what is working well, less well, and future hopes; and explore features to include in the tool.

Methods: This qualitative study identified key stakeholders across the UK via networking and snowball techniques. The stakeholders spanned local organisations (NHS commissioners, GPs, and academics), third sector and national organisations (Public Health England and The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence). We used the validated Hovmand "group model building" approach to engage stakeholders in a series of pre-piloted, structured, small group exercises. We then used Framework Analysis to analyse responses.

Results: Fifteen stakeholders participated in workshop 1. Stakeholders identified continued financial and political support for the NHS Health Check Programme. However, many stakeholders highlighted issues concerning lack of data on processes and outcomes, variability in quality of delivery, and suboptimal public engagement. Stakeholders' hopes included maximising coverage, uptake, and referrals, and producing additional evidence on population health, equity, and economic impacts. Key model suggestions focused on developing good-practice template scenarios, analysis of broader prevention activities at local level, accessible local data, broader economic perspectives, and fit-for-purpose outputs.

Conclusions: A shared understanding of current implementations of the NHS Health Check Programme was developed. Stakeholders demonstrated their commitment to the NHS Health Check Programme whilst highlighting the perceived requirements for enhancing the service and discussed how the modelling tool could be instrumental in this process. These suggestions for improvement informed subsequent workshops and model development.

Citing Articles

Addressing health equity during design and implementation of health system reform initiatives: a scoping review and framework.

Bouckley T, Peiris D, Nambiar D, Mishra S, Sood T, Purwar P Int J Equity Health. 2025; 24(1):68.

PMID: 40069696 PMC: 11899096. DOI: 10.1186/s12939-025-02436-z.


Obesity and Cardiometabolic Risk Factors: From Childhood to Adulthood.

Drozdz D, Alvarez-Pitti J, Wojcik M, Borghi C, Gabbianelli R, Mazur A Nutrients. 2021; 13(11).

PMID: 34836431 PMC: 8624977. DOI: 10.3390/nu13114176.


Modelling tool to support decision-making in the NHS Health Check programme: workshops, systematic review and co-production with users.

Oflaherty M, Lloyd-Williams F, Capewell S, Boland A, Maden M, Collins B Health Technol Assess. 2021; 25(35):1-234.

PMID: 34076574 PMC: 8201571. DOI: 10.3310/hta25350.


Evaluating stakeholder involvement in building a decision support tool for NHS health checks: co-producing the WorkHORSE study.

Lloyd-Williams F, Hyseni L, Guzman-Castillo M, Kypridemos C, Collins B, Capewell S BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020; 20(1):182.

PMID: 32778087 PMC: 7418313. DOI: 10.1186/s12911-020-01205-y.

References
1.
Brownson R, Royer C, Ewing R, McBride T . Researchers and policymakers: travelers in parallel universes. Am J Prev Med. 2006; 30(2):164-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2005.10.004. View

2.
Atkinson J, Wells R, Page A, Dominello A, Haines M, Wilson A . Applications of system dynamics modelling to support health policy. Public Health Res Pract. 2015; 25(3):e2531531. DOI: 10.17061/phrp2531531. View

3.
Jenkins L, Kelly P, Cherbuin N, Anstey K . Evaluating and Using Observational Evidence: The Contrasting Views of Policy Makers and Epidemiologists. Front Public Health. 2016; 4:267. PMC: 5138237. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2016.00267. View

4.
Reed M, Graves A, Dandy N, Posthumus H, Hubacek K, Morris J . Who's in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. J Environ Manage. 2009; 90(5):1933-49. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.01.001. View

5.
Armstrong R, Pettman T, Waters E . Shifting sands - from descriptions to solutions. Public Health. 2014; 128(6):525-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2014.03.013. View