Elucidation of Changes in Cellulose Ultrastructure and Accessibility in Hardwood Fractionation Processes with Carbohydrate Binding Modules

Overview

Journal ACS Sustain Chem Eng

Publisher American Chemical Society

Date 2020 May 12

PMID 32391215

Citations 4

Authors

Vera Novy

Fredrik Nielsen

Johanna Olsson

Kevin Aissa

Jack N Saddler

Ola Wallberg

Mats Galbe

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

We have recently presented a sequential treatment method, in which steam explosion (STEX) was followed by hydrotropic extraction (HEX), to selectively fractionate cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin in hardwood into separate process streams. However, above a treatment severity threshold, the structural alterations in the cellulose-enriched fraction appeared to restrict the enzymatic hydrolyzability and delignification efficiency. To better understand the ultrastructural changes in the cellulose, hardwood chips were treated by single (STEX or HEX) and combined treatments (STEX and HEX), and the cellulose accessibility quantified with carbohydrate-binding modules (CBMs) that bind preferentially to crystalline (CBM2a) and paracrystalline cellulose (CBM17). Fluorescent-tagged versions of the CBMs were used to map the spatial distribution of cellulose substructures with confocal laser scanning microscopy. With increasing severities, STEX increased the apparent crystallinity (CBM2a/CBM17-ratio) and overall accessibility (CBM2aH6 + CBM17) of the cellulose, whereas HEX demonstrated the opposite trend. The respective effects could also be discerned in the combined treatments where increasing severities further resulted in higher hemicellulose dissolution and, although initially beneficial, in stagnating accessibility and hydrolyzability. This study suggests that balancing the severities in the two treatments is required to maximize the fractionation and simultaneously achieve a reactive and accessible cellulose that is readily hydrolyzable.

Citing Articles

Harnessing cellulose-binding protein domains for the development of functionalized cellulose materials.

Li S, Liu G Bioresour Bioprocess. 2024; 11(1):74.

PMID: 39052131 PMC: 11272768. DOI: 10.1186/s40643-024-00790-4.

The use of fluorescent protein-tagged carbohydrate-binding modules to evaluate the influence of drying on cellulose accessibility and enzymatic hydrolysis.

Mboowa D, Khatri V, Saddler J RSC Adv. 2022; 10(45):27152-27160.

PMID: 35515757 PMC: 9055586. DOI: 10.1039/d0ra05333c.

The characteristics of insoluble softwood substrates affect fungal morphology, secretome composition, and hydrolytic efficiency of enzymes produced by Trichoderma reesei.

Novy V, Nielsen F, Cullen D, Sabat G, Houtman C, Hunt C Biotechnol Biofuels. 2021; 14(1):105.

PMID: 33902680 PMC: 8074412. DOI: 10.1186/s13068-021-01955-5.

Investigating the effects of substrate morphology and experimental conditions on the enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass through modeling.

Rohrbach J, Luterbacher J Biotechnol Biofuels. 2021; 14(1):103.

PMID: 33902675 PMC: 8073973. DOI: 10.1186/s13068-021-01920-2.

References

Abbott D, Boraston A . Quantitative approaches to the analysis of carbohydrate-binding module function. Methods Enzymol. 2012; 510:211-31. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-415931-0.00011-2. View

Mou H, Heikkila E, Fardim P . Topochemistry of environmentally friendly pretreatments to enhance enzymatic hydrolysis of sugar cane bagasse to fermentable sugar. J Agric Food Chem. 2014; 62(16):3619-25. DOI: 10.1021/jf500582w. View

Gao S, You C, Renneckar S, Bao J, Zhang Y . New insights into enzymatic hydrolysis of heterogeneous cellulose by using carbohydrate-binding module 3 containing GFP and carbohydrate-binding module 17 containing CFP. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2014; 7(1):24. PMC: 3943381. DOI: 10.1186/1754-6834-7-24. View

Martin-Sampedro R, Eugenio M, Moreno J, Revilla E, Villar J . Integration of a kraft pulping mill into a forest biorefinery: pre-extraction of hemicellulose by steam explosion versus steam treatment. Bioresour Technol. 2013; 153:236-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.11.088. View

Hong J, Ye X, Zhang Y . Quantitative determination of cellulose accessibility to cellulase based on adsorption of a nonhydrolytic fusion protein containing CBM and GFP with its applications. Langmuir. 2007; 23(25):12535-40. DOI: 10.1021/la7025686. View

Gourlay K, Arantes V, Saddler J . Use of substructure-specific carbohydrate binding modules to track changes in cellulose accessibility and surface morphology during the amorphogenesis step of enzymatic hydrolysis. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2012; 5(1):51. PMC: 3432595. DOI: 10.1186/1754-6834-5-51. View

Notenboom V, Boraston A, Chiu P, Freelove A, Kilburn D, Rose D . Recognition of cello-oligosaccharides by a family 17 carbohydrate-binding module: an X-ray crystallographic, thermodynamic and mutagenic study. J Mol Biol. 2001; 314(4):797-806. DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.2001.5153. View

Lee R, Berberi V, Labranche J, Lavoie J . Lignin extraction--reassessment of the severity factor with respect to hydroxide concentration. Bioresour Technol. 2014; 169:707-712. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.07.038. View

Meng X, Ragauskas A . Recent advances in understanding the role of cellulose accessibility in enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosic substrates. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2014; 27:150-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.copbio.2014.01.014. View

10.

Boraston A, Bolam D, Gilbert H, Davies G . Carbohydrate-binding modules: fine-tuning polysaccharide recognition. Biochem J. 2004; 382(Pt 3):769-81. PMC: 1133952. DOI: 10.1042/BJ20040892. View

11.

Matsakas L, Nitsos C, Raghavendran V, Yakimenko O, Persson G, Olsson E . A novel hybrid organosolv: steam explosion method for the efficient fractionation and pretreatment of birch biomass. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2018; 11:160. PMC: 5992717. DOI: 10.1186/s13068-018-1163-3. View

12.

Rahikainen J, Evans J, Mikander S, Kalliola A, Puranen T, Tamminen T . Cellulase-lignin interactions-the role of carbohydrate-binding module and pH in non-productive binding. Enzyme Microb Technol. 2013; 53(5):315-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2013.07.003. View

13.

Gourlay K, Hu J, Arantes V, Penttila M, Saddler J . The use of carbohydrate binding modules (CBMs) to monitor changes in fragmentation and cellulose fiber surface morphology during cellulase- and Swollenin-induced deconstruction of lignocellulosic substrates. J Biol Chem. 2014; 290(5):2938-45. PMC: 4317003. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M114.627604. View

14.

Park S, Baker J, Himmel M, Parilla P, Johnson D . Cellulose crystallinity index: measurement techniques and their impact on interpreting cellulase performance. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2010; 3:10. PMC: 2890632. DOI: 10.1186/1754-6834-3-10. View

15.

Mansfield , Mooney , Saddler . Substrate and Enzyme Characteristics that Limit Cellulose Hydrolysis. Biotechnol Prog. 1999; 15(5):804-816. DOI: 10.1021/bp9900864. View

16.

Rahikainen J, Mikander S, Marjamaa K, Tamminen T, Lappas A, Viikari L . Inhibition of enzymatic hydrolysis by residual lignins from softwood--study of enzyme binding and inactivation on lignin-rich surface. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2011; 108(12):2823-34. DOI: 10.1002/bit.23242. View

17.

Li J, Gellerstedt G, Toven K . Steam explosion lignins; their extraction, structure and potential as feedstock for biodiesel and chemicals. Bioresour Technol. 2009; 100(9):2556-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.12.004. View

18.

Selig M, Viamajala S, Decker S, Tucker M, Himmel M, Vinzant T . Deposition of lignin droplets produced during dilute acid pretreatment of maize stems retards enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose. Biotechnol Prog. 2007; 23(6):1333-9. DOI: 10.1021/bp0702018. View

19.

Trajano H, Engle N, Foston M, Ragauskas A, Tschaplinski T, Wyman C . The fate of lignin during hydrothermal pretreatment. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2013; 6(1):110. PMC: 3751430. DOI: 10.1186/1754-6834-6-110. View

20.

Zhu Y, Malten M, Torry-Smith M, McMillan J, Stickel J . Calculating sugar yields in high solids hydrolysis of biomass. Bioresour Technol. 2010; 102(3):2897-903. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.10.134. View