» Articles » PMID: 32390573

Beyond Allyship: Motivations for Advantaged Group Members to Engage in Action for Disadvantaged Groups

Overview
Publisher Sage Publications
Date 2020 May 12
PMID 32390573
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

White Americans who participate in the Black Lives Matter movement, men who attended the Women's March, and people from the Global North who work to reduce poverty in the Global South-advantaged group members (sometimes referred to as allies) often engage in action for disadvantaged groups. Tensions can arise, however, over the inclusion of advantaged group members in these movements, which we argue can partly be explained by their motivations to participate. We propose that advantaged group members can be motivated to participate in these movements (a) to improve the status of the disadvantaged group, (b) on the condition that the status of their own group is maintained, (c) to meet their own personal needs, and (d) because this behavior aligns with their moral beliefs. We identify potential antecedents and behavioral outcomes associated with these motivations before describing the theoretical contribution our article makes to the psychological literature.

Citing Articles

Your needs or mine? The role of allies' needs and their perceptions of disadvantaged groups' needs in motivating solidarity-based actions.

Saglamoz A, Kutlaca M, Leite A Br J Soc Psychol. 2025; 64(1):e12855.

PMID: 39841549 PMC: 11753487. DOI: 10.1111/bjso.12855.


Exploring Egalitarianism: A Conceptual and Methodological Review of Egalitarianism and Impacts on Positive Intergroup Relations.

Waldrop R, Warren M Behav Sci (Basel). 2024; 14(9).

PMID: 39336057 PMC: 11429248. DOI: 10.3390/bs14090842.


Motivations to engage in collective action: A latent profile analysis of refugee supporters.

Yip L, Thomas E, Bliuc A, Boza M, Kende A, Lizzio-Wilson M Br J Soc Psychol. 2024; 64(1):e12786.

PMID: 38979945 PMC: 11600512. DOI: 10.1111/bjso.12786.


Solidarity with whom? Minority perspectives on allyship in Danish queer spaces.

Van Cong B, Power S, Morton T Br J Soc Psychol. 2024; 64(1):e12780.

PMID: 38940568 PMC: 11588036. DOI: 10.1111/bjso.12780.


When People Do Allyship: A Typology of Allyship Action.

De Souza L, Schmader T Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2024; 29(1):3-31.

PMID: 38459800 PMC: 11734359. DOI: 10.1177/10888683241232732.


References
1.
Radke H, Hornsey M, Sibley C, Thai M, Barlow F . Is the racial composition of your surroundings associated with your levels of social dominance orientation?. PLoS One. 2017; 12(10):e0186612. PMC: 5648236. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186612. View

2.
Subasic E, Reynolds K, Turner J . The political solidarity model of social change: dynamics of self-categorization in intergroup power relations. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2008; 12(4):330-52. DOI: 10.1177/1088868308323223. View

3.
Crosby F, Iyer A, Sincharoen S . Understanding affirmative action. Annu Rev Psychol. 2005; 57:585-611. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190029. View

4.
Harth N, Kessler T, Leach C . Advantaged group's emotional reactions to intergroup inequality: the dynamics of pride, guilt, and sympathy. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2007; 34(1):115-29. DOI: 10.1177/0146167207309193. View

5.
Schein C, Gray K . The Theory of Dyadic Morality: Reinventing Moral Judgment by Redefining Harm. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2017; 22(1):32-70. DOI: 10.1177/1088868317698288. View