» Articles » PMID: 32386720

Raltegravir Versus Efavirenz in Antiretroviral-naive Pregnant Women Living with HIV (NICHD P1081): an Open-label, Randomised, Controlled, Phase 4 Trial

Abstract

Background: Although antiretroviral regimens containing integrase inhibitors rapidly suppress HIV viral load in non-pregnant adults, few published data from randomised controlled trials have compared the safety and efficacy of any integrase inhibitor to efavirenz when initiated during pregnancy. We compared safety and efficacy of antiretroviral therapy with either raltegravir or efavirenz in late pregnancy.

Methods: An open-label, randomised controlled trial was done at 19 hospitals and clinics in Argentina, Brazil, South Africa, Tanzania, Thailand, and the USA. Antiretroviral-naive pregnant women (20-<37 weeks gestation) living with HIV were assigned to antiretroviral regimens containing either raltegravir (400 mg twice daily) or efavirenz (600 mg each night) plus lamivudine 150 mg and zidovudine 300 mg twice daily (or approved alternative backbone regimen), using a web-based, permuted-block randomisation stratified by gestational age and backbone regimen. The primary efficacy outcome was plasma HIV viral load below 200 copies per mL at (or near) delivery. The primary efficacy analysis included all women with a viral load measurement at (or near) delivery who had viral load of at least 200 copies per mL before treatment and no genotypic resistance to any study drugs; secondary analyses eliminated these exclusion criteria. The primary safety analyses included all women who received study drug, and their infants. This trial is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov, number NCT01618305.

Findings: From Sep 5, 2013, to Dec 11, 2018, 408 women were enrolled (206 raltegravir, 202 efavirenz) and 394 delivered on-study (200 raltegravir, 194 efavirenz); 307 were included in the primary efficacy analysis (153 raltegravir, 154 efavirenz). 144 (94%) women in the raltegravir group and 129 (84%) in the efavirenz group met the primary efficacy outcome (absolute difference 10%, 95% CI 3-18; p=0·0015); the difference primarily occurred among women enrolling later in pregnancy (interaction p=0·040). Frequencies of severe or life-threatening adverse events were similar among mothers (30% in each group; 61 raltegravir, 59 efavirenz) and infants (25% in each group; 50 raltegravir, 48 efavirenz), with no treatment-related deaths.

Interpretation: Our findings support major guidelines. The integrase inhibitor dolutegravir is currently a preferred regimen for the prevention of perinatal HIV transmission with raltegravir recommended as a preferred or alternative integrase inhibitor for pregnant women living with HIV.

Funding: Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.

Citing Articles

Role of Dolutegravir/Lamivudine in the Management of Pregnant People Living with HIV-1: A Narrative Review.

Short W, Patel P, Verdier G, Puga A, Vannappagari V, de Ruiter A Infect Dis Ther. 2024; 14(1):59-80.

PMID: 39652285 PMC: 11782740. DOI: 10.1007/s40121-024-01085-z.


Efficacy and Safety of DRG/3TC for Prophylaxis of HIV Perinatal Transmission: A Pilot Study (PREGNANCY).

Brites C, Luz E, Nobrega I, Luz I, Zajdenverg R, de Ruiter A Open Forum Infect Dis. 2024; 11(12):ofae672.

PMID: 39605976 PMC: 11600954. DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofae672.


Care of Pregnant Women Living with Human Immunodeficiency Virus.

Stranix-Chibanda L, Brooks K, Eke A Clin Perinatol. 2024; 51(4):749-767.

PMID: 39487018 PMC: 11724433. DOI: 10.1016/j.clp.2024.08.010.


Adverse perinatal outcomes associated with different classes of antiretroviral drugs in pregnant women with HIV.

Hey M, Thompson L, Portwood C, Sexton H, Kumarendran M, Brandon Z AIDS. 2024; 39(2):162-174.

PMID: 39407417 PMC: 11676599. DOI: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000004032.


Comparison of safety and effectiveness of antiretroviral therapy regimens among pregnant women living with HIV at preconception or during pregnancy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Mehrabi F, Karamouzian M, Farhoudi B, Langeroodi S, Mehmandoost S, Abbaszadeh S BMC Infect Dis. 2024; 24(1):417.

PMID: 38641597 PMC: 11031873. DOI: 10.1186/s12879-024-09303-2.


References
1.
de Lourdes Teixeira M, Nafea S, Yeganeh N, Santos E, Gouvea M, Joao E . High rates of baseline antiretroviral resistance among HIV-infected pregnant women in an HIV referral centre in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Int J STD AIDS. 2014; 26(13):922-8. DOI: 10.1177/0956462414562477. View

2.
Zash R, Jacobson D, Diseko M, Mayondi G, Mmalane M, Essex M . Comparative safety of dolutegravir-based or efavirenz-based antiretroviral treatment started during pregnancy in Botswana: an observational study. Lancet Glob Health. 2018; 6(7):e804-e810. PMC: 6071315. DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30218-3. View

3.
Gillespie B, Chen Q, Reichert H, Franzblau A, Hedgeman E, Lepkowski J . Estimating population distributions when some data are below a limit of detection by using a reverse Kaplan-Meier estimator. Epidemiology. 2010; 21 Suppl 4:S64-70. DOI: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181ce9f08. View

4.
Maliakkal A, Walmsley S, Tseng A . Critical Review: Review of the Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of Raltegravir in Pregnancy. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2016; 72(2):153-61. DOI: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000000932. View

5.
Lennox J, DeJesus E, Lazzarin A, Pollard R, Madruga J, Berger D . Safety and efficacy of raltegravir-based versus efavirenz-based combination therapy in treatment-naive patients with HIV-1 infection: a multicentre, double-blind randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2009; 374(9692):796-806. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60918-1. View