» Articles » PMID: 32385757

Efficacy and Safety of Romosozumab in Treatment for Low Bone Mineral Density: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview
Journal Clin Rheumatol
Publisher Springer
Specialty Rheumatology
Date 2020 May 10
PMID 32385757
Citations 28
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Osteoporosis is a chronic skeletal disease with an increasing prevalence. Romosozumab, as a monoclonal anti-sclerostin antibody with a dual function, has been produced. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to examine the efficacy of Romosozumab in patients with low bone mineral density. A systematic search was conducted in the most important electronic search engines like Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov at the end of July 2019 to retrieve randomized controlled trials (RCTs), which evaluated the effect of Romosozumab in patients with osteoporosis and/or low bone mineral density. After evaluating the quality of articles with the Cochrane checklist, data related to the outcomes of bone mineral density (BMD) of lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total hip, risk of clinical, vertebral and non-vertebral fractures, and risk of adverse events were extracted. Quality of evidence was assessed according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Heterogeneity between studies was evaluated by I2 and Q statistics. The meta-analysis was performed using CMA v.2.0 software. Of all the 671 initially retrieved articles, seven articles were entered into the meta-analysis after removing duplicates and reviewing papers with inclusion and exclusion criteria. The results of the meta-analysis showed that Romosozumab 210, 140, and 70 mg compared with Alendronate, Teriparatide, and placebo can increase the bone mineral density in the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total hip. The risk of adverse events like adjudicated cardiovascular serious adverse events and adjudicated cardiovascular death was more in Romosozumab 210 mg in comparison with placebo. However, this difference was not statistically significant. Treatment with anti-sclerostin antibodies can be a proper therapeutic option in patients with osteoporosis and low bone mineral density. Based on the results of this meta-analysis, it seems that Romosozumab, with its dual function, has a positive role in the treatment of osteoporosis and low bone mineral density.

Citing Articles

Cardiovascular safety of osteoanabolic agents.

Takeuchi Y J Bone Miner Metab. 2025; .

PMID: 39825110 DOI: 10.1007/s00774-025-01580-4.


Sclerostin as a new target of diabetes-induced osteoporosis.

Li Y, Luo Y, Huang D, Peng L Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024; 15:1491066.

PMID: 39720253 PMC: 11666367. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1491066.


Sclerostin as a Genetic Determinant of Trabecular Bone Score in Postmenopausal Women: The Bushehr Elderly Health (BEH) Program.

Bidkhori M, Akbarzadeh M, Fahimfar N, Moroudi R, Hajivalizadeh S, Larijani B Iran J Public Health. 2024; 53(10):2371-2379.

PMID: 39544857 PMC: 11557747. DOI: 10.18502/ijph.v53i10.16724.


Effect of genetically predicted sclerostin on cardiovascular biomarkers, risk factors, and disease outcomes.

Alcalde-Herraiz M, Xie J, Newby D, Prats C, Gill D, Gordillo-Maranon M Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):9832.

PMID: 39537602 PMC: 11561231. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-53623-5.


Efficacy and safety of romosozumab: a meta-analysis of placebo-controlled trials.

Kobayashi T, Hara M, Shimanoe C, Morimoto T, Masaaki M, Ito K J Bone Miner Metab. 2024; 42(5):492-502.

PMID: 38977437 DOI: 10.1007/s00774-024-01531-5.


References
1.
Papapoulos S, Lippuner K, Roux C, Lin C, Kendler D, Lewiecki E . The effect of 8 or 5 years of denosumab treatment in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: results from the FREEDOM Extension study. Osteoporos Int. 2015; 26(12):2773-83. PMC: 4656716. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-015-3234-7. View

2.
Rachner T, Khosla S, Hofbauer L . Osteoporosis: now and the future. Lancet. 2011; 377(9773):1276-87. PMC: 3555696. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62349-5. View

3.
Orive M, Aguirre U, Garcia-Gutierrez S, Las Hayas C, Bilbao A, Gonzalez N . Changes in health-related quality of life and activities of daily living after hip fracture because of a fall in elderly patients: a prospective cohort study. Int J Clin Pract. 2015; 69(4):491-500. DOI: 10.1111/ijcp.12527. View

4.
Vergara I, Vrotsou K, Orive M, Gonzalez N, Garcia S, Quintana J . Factors related to functional prognosis in elderly patients after accidental hip fractures: a prospective cohort study. BMC Geriatr. 2014; 14:124. PMC: 4280690. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2318-14-124. View

5.
Bolland M, Grey A, Gamble G, Reid I . Effect of osteoporosis treatment on mortality: a meta-analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010; 95(3):1174-81. DOI: 10.1210/jc.2009-0852. View