» Articles » PMID: 32384360

Variations in Follow-up After Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

Overview
Publisher Wolters Kluwer
Specialty Nursing
Date 2020 May 9
PMID 32384360
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: A multidisciplinary patient-centered approach using evidence-based care is recommended in recent atrial fibrillation (AF) guidelines to achieve quality patient outcomes. Professional society guidelines are conflicting and vague in recommendations on timing of follow-up after AF ablation.

Purpose: The aim of this secondary analysis was to examine whether the type and timing of follow-up care after AF ablation affected patient outcomes.

Methods: A 2-year, longitudinal, pilot study to explore patient experiences during the first 6 months following an AF ablation was conducted. Patients completed surveys and phone interviews before ablation, and at 1, 3, and 6 months after the ablation. Pearson correlations and repeated-measures analysis of variance were used for comparison of outcomes over time.

Results: The sample (N = 20) had a mean age of 65 (± 7) years, was 55% female, 35% paroxysmal AF, and 65% persistent AF pre-ablation. Timing of follow-up visits following AF ablation varied widely. Patients reported many concerns and difficulties reflecting the lack of knowledge and unrealistic expectations of post-ablation recovery. Better outcomes were noted in those who were seen at 1-week post-ablation by a nurse practitioner (NP) compared with those who were not seen until 1 or 3 months after ablation by a physician.

Implications For Practice: Atrial fibrillation ablation is routinely performed in the United States, yet there seems to be a lack of standardization concerning the type and timing of follow-up care after AF ablation. These preliminary findings support a standardized approach to include an NP visit at one week after AF ablation to achieve quality AF patient outcomes.

References
1.
Oliver G, Pennington L, Revelle S, Rantz M . Impact of nurse practitioners on health outcomes of Medicare and Medicaid patients. Nurs Outlook. 2014; 62(6):440-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.outlook.2014.07.004. View

2.
Dorian P, Cvitkovic S, Kerr C, Crystal E, Gillis A, Guerra P . A novel, simple scale for assessing the symptom severity of atrial fibrillation at the bedside: the CCS-SAF scale. Can J Cardiol. 2006; 22(5):383-6. PMC: 2560532. DOI: 10.1016/s0828-282x(06)70922-9. View

3.
Nyenhuis D, Yamamoto C, Luchetta T, Terrien A, Parmentier A . Adult and geriatric normative data and validation of the profile of mood states. J Clin Psychol. 1999; 55(1):79-86. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4679(199901)55:1<79::aid-jclp8>3.0.co;2-7. View

4.
Wood K, Stewart A, Drew B, Scheinman M, Froelicher E . Patient perception of symptoms and quality of life following ablation in patients with supraventricular tachycardia. Heart Lung. 2010; 39(1):12-20. PMC: 2817962. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2009.04.001. View

5.
Willems S, Khairy P, Andrade J, Hoffmann B, Levesque S, Verma A . Redefining the Blanking Period After Catheter Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: Insights From the ADVICE (Adenosine Following Pulmonary Vein Isolation to Target Dormant Conduction Elimination) Trial. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2016; 9(8). DOI: 10.1161/CIRCEP.115.003909. View