» Articles » PMID: 32379844

Transcriptome Analysis Identifies Genes Involved with the Development of Umbilical Hernias in Pigs

Abstract

Umbilical hernia (UH) is one of the most frequent defects affecting pig production, however, it also affects humans and other mammals. UH is characterized as an abnormal protrusion of the abdominal contents to the umbilical region, causing pain, discomfort and reduced performance in pigs. Some genomic regions associated to UH have already been identified, however, no study involving RNA sequencing was performed when umbilical tissue is considered. Therefore, here, we have sequenced the umbilical ring transcriptome of five normal and five UH-affected pigs to uncover genes and pathways involved with UH development. A total of 13,216 transcripts were expressed in the umbilical ring tissue. From those, 230 genes were differentially expressed (DE) between normal and UH-affected pigs (FDR <0.05), being 145 downregulated and 85 upregulated in the affected compared to the normal pigs. A total of 68 significant biological processes were identified and the most relevant were extracellular matrix, immune system, anatomical development, cell adhesion, membrane components, receptor activation, calcium binding and immune synapse. The results pointed out ACAN, MMPs, COLs, EPYC, VIT, CCBE1 and LGALS3 as strong candidates to trigger umbilical hernias in pigs since they act in the extracellular matrix remodeling and in the production, integrity and resistance of the collagen. We have generated the first transcriptome of the pig umbilical ring tissue, which allowed the identification of genes that had not yet been related to umbilical hernias in pigs. Nevertheless, further studies are needed to identify the causal mutations, SNPs and CNVs in these genes to improve our understanding of the mechanisms of gene regulation.

Citing Articles

Part II: understanding pain in pigs-pain assessment in pigs with spontaneously occurring diseases or injuries.

Kschonek J, Deters K, Miller M, Reinmold J, Twele L, Emmerich I Porcine Health Manag. 2025; 11(1):13.

PMID: 40075420 PMC: 11900645. DOI: 10.1186/s40813-025-00420-1.


Does lifting female piglets by one hind leg increase the risk of umbilical and hind leg lesions?.

Barington K, Hansen M, Andersen A, Pedersen K, Larsen I Porcine Health Manag. 2024; 10(1):61.

PMID: 39707569 PMC: 11662798. DOI: 10.1186/s40813-024-00413-6.


Altered Transcript Levels of and Genes in the Muscle and Connective Tissue of Pigs with Umbilical Hernia.

Wozniak J, Loba W, Wysocka A, Dzimira S, Przadka P, Switonski M Genes (Basel). 2023; 14(10).

PMID: 37895252 PMC: 10606093. DOI: 10.3390/genes14101903.


A joint analysis using exome and transcriptome data identifiescandidate polymorphisms and genes involved with umbilical hernia in pigs.

Savoldi I, Ibelli A, Cantao M, Peixoto J, Pires M, Mores M BMC Genomics. 2021; 22(1):818.

PMID: 34773987 PMC: 8590244. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-021-08138-4.


Genes and SNPs Involved with Scrotal and Umbilical Hernia in Pigs.

Rodrigues A, Ibelli A, Peixoto J, Cantao M, de Oliveira H, Savoldi I Genes (Basel). 2021; 12(2).

PMID: 33513662 PMC: 7912685. DOI: 10.3390/genes12020166.

References
1.
Wang P, Li S, Xiao X, Guo X, Zhang Q . An evaluation of OPTC and EPYC as candidate genes for high myopia. Mol Vis. 2009; 15:2045-9. PMC: 2763122. View

2.
Liu F . Regulatory roles of galectins in the immune response. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2005; 136(4):385-400. DOI: 10.1159/000084545. View

3.
Vlahakis A, Debnath J . The Interconnections between Autophagy and Integrin-Mediated Cell Adhesion. J Mol Biol. 2016; 429(4):515-530. PMC: 5276719. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2016.11.027. View

4.
Anders S, Pyl P, Huber W . HTSeq--a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2014; 31(2):166-9. PMC: 4287950. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu638. View

5.
Kremmidiotis G, Baker E, Crawford J, Eyre H, Nahmias J, Callen D . Localization of human cadherin genes to chromosome regions exhibiting cancer-related loss of heterozygosity. Genomics. 1998; 49(3):467-71. DOI: 10.1006/geno.1998.5281. View