» Articles » PMID: 32379765

A Comparison of Three Methods in Categorizing Functional Status to Predict Hospital Readmission Across Post-acute Care

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2020 May 8
PMID 32379765
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Methods used to categorize functional status to predict health outcomes across post-acute care settings vary significantly.

Objectives: We compared three methods that categorize functional status to predict 30-day and 90-day hospital readmission across inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRF), skilled nursing facilities (SNF) and home health agencies (HHA).

Research Design: Retrospective analysis of 2013-2014 Medicare claims data (N = 740,530). Data were randomly split into two subsets using a 1:1 ratio. We used half of the cohort (development subset) to develop functional status categories for three methods, and then used the rest (testing subset) to compare outcome prediction. Three methods to generate functional categories were labeled as: Method I, percentile based on proportional distribution; Method II, percentile based on change score distribution; and Method III, functional staging categories based on Rasch person strata. We used six differentiation and classification statistics to determine the optimal method of generating functional categories.

Setting: IRF, SNF and HHA.

Subjects: We included 130,670 (17.7%) Medicare beneficiaries with stroke, 498,576 (67.3%) with lower extremity joint replacement and 111,284 (15.0%) with hip and femur fracture.

Measures: Unplanned 30-day and 90-day hospital readmission.

Results: For all impairment conditions, Method III best predicted 30-day and 90-day hospital readmission. However, we observed overlapping confidence intervals among some comparisons of three methods. The bootstrapping of 30-day and 90-day hospital readmission predictive models showed the area under curve for Method III was statistically significantly higher than both Method I and Method II (all paired-comparisons, p<.001), using the testing sample.

Conclusions: Overall, functional staging was the optimal method to generate functional status categories to predict 30-day and 90-day hospital readmission. To facilitate clinical and scientific use, we suggest the most appropriate method to categorize functional status should be based on the strengths and weaknesses of each method.

Citing Articles

Crosswalk Algorithms for Cognitive and Functional Outcomes Among 2013-2018 Medicare Beneficiaries With Dementia.

Pritchard K, Mahesri M, Chen Q, Yang C, Brill G, Kim D J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2024; 25(10):105168.

PMID: 39067864 PMC: 11486573. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105168.


Inclusion of patient-level emergency department characteristics to classify potentially redirectable visits to subacute care: a modified Delphi consensus study.

Strum R, Tavares W, Worster A, Griffith L, Costa A CMAJ Open. 2023; 11(1):E70-E76.

PMID: 36693658 PMC: 9876581. DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20220062.


Data Science Trends Relevant to Nursing Practice: A Rapid Review of the 2020 Literature.

Douthit B, Walden R, Cato K, Coviak C, Cruz C, DAgostino F Appl Clin Inform. 2022; 13(1):161-179.

PMID: 35139564 PMC: 8828453. DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1742218.


Functional Status Across Post-Acute Settings is Associated With 30-Day and 90-Day Hospital Readmissions.

Li C, Haas A, Pritchard K, Karmarkar A, Kuo Y, Hreha K J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2021; 22(12):2447-2453.e5.

PMID: 34473961 PMC: 8627458. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2021.07.039.

References
1.
Pope G, Kautter J, Ellis R, Ash A, Ayanian J, Lezzoni L . Risk adjustment of Medicare capitation payments using the CMS-HCC model. Health Care Financ Rev. 2004; 25(4):119-41. PMC: 4194896. View

2.
Pencina M, DAgostino Sr R, DAgostino Jr R, Vasan R . Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: from area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond. Stat Med. 2007; 27(2):157-72. DOI: 10.1002/sim.2929. View

3.
Tao W, Haley S, Coster W, Ni P, Jette A . An exploratory analysis of functional staging using an item response theory approach. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008; 89(6):1046-53. PMC: 2677141. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.11.036. View

4.
Naggara O, Raymond J, Guilbert F, Roy D, Weill A, Altman D . Analysis by categorizing or dichotomizing continuous variables is inadvisable: an example from the natural history of unruptured aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011; 32(3):437-40. PMC: 8013096. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2425. View

5.
Harrell Jr F, Lee K, Mark D . Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Stat Med. 1996; 15(4):361-87. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19960229)15:4<361::AID-SIM168>3.0.CO;2-4. View