» Articles » PMID: 32377414

Visual and Refractive Outcomes of Cataract Surgeries Performed in One Year in a Private Practice Setting: Review of 2714 Procedures

Overview
Journal J Ophthalmol
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2020 May 8
PMID 32377414
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Methods: Our center's database was used to identify all isolated cataract procedures performed during 2017. The electronic records were reviewed to collect the preoperative information, presence of intra- or postsurgical complications, and visual and refractive outcomes one month after surgery.

Results: In 2017, 2714 eyes of 1543 patients underwent cataract surgery in our center. Mean patient age was 70.42 years. 775 eyes (28.55%) had prior ophthalmic pathologies, and 113 eyes (4.16%) had undergone previous surgical procedures. Surgical complications developed in 35 eyes (1.29%), including 9 posterior capsule tears (0.33%) and 3 cases of dropped lens fragments (0.11%). A toric or multifocal intraocular lens was implanted in 45.6% of eyes. As regards postoperative complications, 59 eyes (2.17%) required a return to the operating theater, including 29 eyes (1.07%) requiring reinterventions due to an unexpected refractive result. There were no cases of endophthalmitis. Mean LogMAR-corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) improved from 0.25 (SD 0.34) preoperatively to 0.04 (SD 0.17) postoperatively; 86.5% of eyes achieved a CDVA ≤0.0, with 97.5% achieving ≤0.3. In 86.4% of eyes, the difference between target and residual spherical equivalent difference was of 0.50 D or lower; 88% of eyes had a spherical equivalent ±0.50 D.

Conclusions: The visual and refractive outcomes of cataract surgery in a private practice setting were excellent, well over the benchmarks set by the ESCRS. The safety profile was also within expected standards. This study provides information for ophthalmologists in private practice on expected outcomes.

Citing Articles

Residual refractive errors in pseudophakic eyes and related factors: a population-based study.

Hashemi H, Jamali A, Rezavn F, Hashemi A, Khabazkhoob M Int J Ophthalmol. 2023; 16(5):778-786.

PMID: 37206186 PMC: 10172090. DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2023.05.16.


Comparison of Primary Duet Lens Procedures: In-The-Bag Monofocal with Sulcus Multifocal, and Standard Single Multifocal Lens for Cataract Surgery.

Harrisberg B, Chua A, Chua M, Taher A Clin Ophthalmol. 2023; 17:273-282.

PMID: 36698853 PMC: 9869909. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S396472.


Impact of Global Optimization of Lens Constants on Absolute Prediction Error for Final IOL Power Selection When Using Intraoperative Aberrometry.

Davidson J, Gu X, Breen M, Babu R Clin Ophthalmol. 2022; 16:3155-3164.

PMID: 36193510 PMC: 9526440. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S369797.


Correlations of Immediate Corneal Tomography Changes with Preoperative and the Elapsed Phaco Parameters.

Haddad J, Borges C, Daher N, Mine A, Salomao M, Ambrosio Jr R Clin Ophthalmol. 2022; 16:2421-2428.

PMID: 35957658 PMC: 9359794. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S363185.


Clinical safety and efficacy of a preloaded monofocal hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens in a real-world population.

Latham S, Carr F, Ali H, Gangwani V BMC Ophthalmol. 2021; 21(1):379.

PMID: 34696772 PMC: 8543946. DOI: 10.1186/s12886-021-02142-8.

References
1.
Daien V, Papinaud L, Gillies M, Domerg C, Nagot N, Lacombe S . Effectiveness and Safety of an Intracameral Injection of Cefuroxime for the Prevention of Endophthalmitis After Cataract Surgery With or Without Perioperative Capsular Rupture. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016; 134(7):810-6. DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.1351. View

2.
Creuzot-Garcher C, Benzenine E, Mariet A, De Lazzer A, Chiquet C, Bron A . Incidence of Acute Postoperative Endophthalmitis after Cataract Surgery: A Nationwide Study in France from 2005 to 2014. Ophthalmology. 2016; 123(7):1414-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.02.019. View

3.
Lundstrom M, Behndig A, Kugelberg M, Montan P, Stenevi U, Thorburn W . Decreasing rate of capsule complications in cataract surgery: eight-year study of incidence, risk factors, and data validity by the Swedish National Cataract Register. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011; 37(10):1762-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.05.022. View

4.
Tan J, Ferdi A, Gillies M, Watson S . Clinical Registries in Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2018; 126(5):655-662. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.12.030. View

5.
Coleman A . How Big Data Informs Us About Cataract Surgery: The LXXII Edward Jackson Memorial Lecture. Am J Ophthalmol. 2015; 160(6):1091-1103.e3. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2015.09.028. View