» Articles » PMID: 32375682

Spatial Patterns in Prostate Cancer-specific Mortality in Pennsylvania Using Pennsylvania Cancer Registry Data, 2004-2014

Overview
Journal BMC Cancer
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Oncology
Date 2020 May 8
PMID 32375682
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Spatial heterogeneity of prostate cancer-specific mortality in Pennsylvania remains unclear. We utilized advanced geospatial survival regressions to examine spatial variation of prostate cancer-specific mortality in PA and evaluate potential effects of individual- and county-level risk factors.

Methods: Prostate cancer cases, aged ≥40 years, were identified in the 2004-2014 Pennsylvania Cancer Registry. The 2018 County Health Rankings data and the 2014 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Environmental Quality Index were used to extract county-level data. The accelerated failure time models with spatial frailties for geographical correlations were used to assess prostate cancer-specific mortality rates for Pennsylvania and by the Penn State Cancer Institute (PSCI) 28-county catchment area. Secondary assessment based on estimated spatial frailties was conducted to identify potential health and environmental risk factors for mortality.

Results: There were 94,274 cases included. The 5-year survival rate in PA was 82% (95% confidence interval, CI: 81.1-82.8%), with the catchment area having a lower survival rate 81% (95% CI: 79.5-82.6%) compared to the non-catchment area rate of 82.3% (95% CI: 81.4-83.2%). Black men, uninsured, more aggressive prostate cancer, rural and urban Appalachia, positive lymph nodes, and no definitive treatment were associated with lower survival. Several county-level health (i.e., poor physical activity) and environmental factors in air and land (i.e., defoliate chemical applied) were associated with higher mortality rates.

Conclusions: Spatial variations in prostate cancer-specific mortality rates exist in Pennsylvania with a higher risk in the PSCI's catchment area, in particular, rural-Appalachia. County-level health and environmental factors may contribute to spatial heterogeneity in prostate cancer-specific mortality.

Citing Articles

Spatial-temporal Bayesian accelerated failure time models for survival endpoints with applications to prostate cancer registry data.

Wang M, Li Z, Lu J, Zhang L, Li Y, Zhang L BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024; 24(1):86.

PMID: 38589783 PMC: 11003030. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-024-02201-w.


Spatio-temporal mapping of breast and prostate cancers in South Iran from 2014 to 2017.

Montazeri M, Hoseini B, Firouraghi N, Kiani F, Raouf-Mobini H, Biabangard A BMC Cancer. 2020; 20(1):1170.

PMID: 33256668 PMC: 7708260. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-07674-8.

References
1.
Fairley L, Forman D, West R, Manda S . Spatial variation in prostate cancer survival in the Northern and Yorkshire region of England using Bayesian relative survival smoothing. Br J Cancer. 2008; 99(11):1786-93. PMC: 2600701. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604757. View

2.
Wang M, Matthews S, Iskandarani K, Li Y, Li Z, Chinchilli V . Spatial-temporal analysis of prostate cancer incidence from the Pennsylvania Cancer Registry, 2000-2011. Geospat Health. 2017; 12(2):611. PMC: 6337722. DOI: 10.4081/gh.2017.611. View

3.
Carroll R, Lawson A, Jackson C, Zhao S . Assessment of spatial variation in breast cancer-specific mortality using Louisiana SEER data. Soc Sci Med. 2017; 193:1-7. PMC: 5659900. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.09.045. View

4.
Carroll R, Zhao S . Trends in Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Survival in Iowa SEER Data: The Timing of It All. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2019; 18(2):e261-e274. PMC: 7983285. DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2018.12.001. View

5.
Lee J, Giovannucci E, Jeon J . Diabetes and mortality in patients with prostate cancer: a meta-analysis. Springerplus. 2016; 5(1):1548. PMC: 5021649. DOI: 10.1186/s40064-016-3233-y. View