Internal Migration in the United States: A Comprehensive Comparative Assessment of the Consumer Credit Panel

Overview

Journal Demogr Res

Specialty Public Health

Date 2020 May 7

PMID 32372879

Citations 8

Authors

Jack DeWaard

Janna Johnson

Stephan Whitaker

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: We introduce and provide the first comprehensive comparative assessment of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York/Equifax Consumer Credit Panel (CCP) as a valuable and underutilized dataset for studying internal migration within the United States. Relative to other data sources on US internal migration, the CCP permits highly detailed cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses of migration, both temporally and geographically.

Objective: We seek to demonstrate the comparative utility and some of the unique advantages of the CCP relative to other data sources on US internal migration.

Methods: We compare cross-sectional and longitudinal estimates of migration from the CCP to similar estimates derived from the American Community Survey, the Current Population Survey, Internal Revenue Service data, the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth, the Panel Study of Income Dynamics, and the Survey of Income and Program Participation.

Results: Our results firmly establish the comparative utility and clearly illustrate some of the unique advantages of the CCP relative to other data sources on US internal migration.

Conclusions: We conclude by identifying some profitable directions for future research on US internal migration using the CCP, as well as reminding readers of the strengths and limitations of these data.

Contribution: We provide an introduction to the CCP as a comprehensive comparative point of reference to stimulate future research on US internal migration using these data. More broadly, this paper contributes to research on the use of non-traditional data sources to study migration given well-documented problems with the availability, quality, and comparability of migration data from traditional sources.

Citing Articles

Rare and highly destructive wildfires drive human migration in the U.S.

McConnell K, Fussell E, DeWaard J, Whitaker S, Curtis K, St Denis L Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):6631.

PMID: 39103334 PMC: 11300458. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-50630-4.

Spatial Patterns and Determinants of Inter-county Migration in California: A Multilevel Gravity Model Approach.

Xu A Popul Res Policy Rev. 2023; 42(3):40.

PMID: 37128246 PMC: 10132804. DOI: 10.1007/s11113-023-09782-2.

Migration as a Vector of Economic Losses From Disaster-Affected Areas in the United States.

DeWaard J, Fussell E, Curtis K, Whitaker S, McConnell K, Price K Demography. 2023; 60(1):173-199.

PMID: 36692164 PMC: 9918685. DOI: 10.1215/00703370-10426100.

An Evaluation of Geo-located Twitter Data for Measuring Human Migration.

Yin J, Gao Y, Chi G Int J Geogr Inf Sci. 2023; 36(9):1830-1852.

PMID: 36643847 PMC: 9837860. DOI: 10.1080/13658816.2022.2075878.

Operationalizing and empirically identifying populations trapped in place by climate and environmental stressors in Mexico.

DeWaard J, Hunter L, Mathews M, Quinones E, Riosmena F, Simon D Reg Environ Change. 2022; 22(1).

PMID: 35422672 PMC: 9004677. DOI: 10.1007/s10113-022-01882-7.

References

Hunter L, Luna J, Norton R . The Environmental Dimensions of Migration. Annu Rev Sociol. 2018; 41:377-397. PMC: 5979262. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-soc-073014-112223. View

Nawrotzki R, DeWaard J . Putting trapped populations into place: Climate change and inter-district migration flows in Zambia. Reg Environ Change. 2018; 18(2):533-546. PMC: 5810408. DOI: 10.1007/s10113-017-1224-3. View

DeWaard J, Fussell E, Curtis K, Ha J . Changing Spatial Interconnectivity during the "Great American Migration Slowdown": A Decomposition of Intercounty Migration Rates, 1990-2010. Popul Space Place. 2020; 26(1). PMC: 7059614. DOI: 10.1002/psp.2274. View

Groen J, Polivka A . Going home after Hurricane Katrina: Determinants of return migration and changes in affected areas. Demography. 2011; 47(4):821-44. PMC: 3000040. DOI: 10.1007/BF03214587. View

Cesare N, Lee H, McCormick T, Spiro E, Zagheni E . Promises and Pitfalls of Using Digital Traces for Demographic Research. Demography. 2018; 55(5):1979-1999. PMC: 6292527. DOI: 10.1007/s13524-018-0715-2. View

Fussell E, Curtis K, DeWaard J . Recovery Migration to the City of New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina: A Migration Systems Approach. Popul Environ. 2014; 35(3):305-322. PMC: 3979579. DOI: 10.1007/s11111-014-0204-5. View

Grecequet M, DeWaard J, Hellmann J, Abel G . Climate Vulnerability and Human Migration in Global Perspective. Sustainability. 2018; 9(5). PMC: 5912889. DOI: 10.3390/su9050720. View

Abel G, Sander N . Quantifying global international migration flows. Science. 2014; 343(6178):1520-2. DOI: 10.1126/science.1248676. View

Willekens F, Massey D, Raymer J, Beauchemin C . INTERNATIONAL MIGRATION. International migration under the microscope. Science. 2016; 352(6288):897-9. PMC: 5508757. DOI: 10.1126/science.aaf6545. View

10.

Bernard A . Cohort Measures of Internal Migration: Understanding Long-Term Trends. Demography. 2017; 54(6):2201-2221. DOI: 10.1007/s13524-017-0626-7. View

11.

Fitzgerald J . Attrition in Models of Intergenerational Links Using the PSID with Extensions to Health and to Sibling Models. B E J Econom Anal Policy. 2012; 11(3). PMC: 3285469. DOI: 10.2202/1935-1682.2868. View

12.

Massey D, Durand J, Pren K . Why Border Enforcement Backfired. AJS. 2016; 121(5):1557-1600. PMC: 5049707. DOI: 10.1086/684200. View

13.

Massey D, Espana F . The social process of international migration. Science. 1987; 237(4816):733-8. DOI: 10.1126/science.237.4816.733. View

14.

Kaplan G, Schulhofer-Wohl S . Interstate migration has fallen less than you think: consequences of hot deck imputation in the current population survey. Demography. 2012; 49(3):1061-74. DOI: 10.1007/s13524-012-0110-3. View

15.

Rogers A, Watkins J . General versus elderly interstate migration and population redistribution in the United States. Res Aging. 1987; 9(4):483-529. DOI: 10.1177/0164027587094002. View

16.

Rodriguez-Diaz C . Maria in Puerto Rico: Natural Disaster in a Colonial Archipelago. Am J Public Health. 2017; 108(1):30-32. PMC: 5719712. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.304198. View

17.

Kates R, Colten C, Laska S, Leatherman S . Reconstruction of New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina: a research perspective. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006; 103(40):14653-60. PMC: 1595407. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0605726103. View

18.

Black R, Bennett S, Thomas S, Beddington J . Climate change: Migration as adaptation. Nature. 2011; 478(7370):447-9. DOI: 10.1038/478477a. View

19.

Ding L, Hwang J, Divringi E . Gentrification and Residential Mobility in Philadelphia. Reg Sci Urban Econ. 2017; 61:38-51. PMC: 5450830. DOI: 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2016.09.004. View

20.

Zorrilla C . The View from Puerto Rico - Hurricane Maria and Its Aftermath. N Engl J Med. 2017; 377(19):1801-1803. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp1713196. View