» Articles » PMID: 32370788

Medical Physics Challenges in Clinical MR-guided Radiotherapy

Overview
Journal Radiat Oncol
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialties Oncology
Radiology
Date 2020 May 7
PMID 32370788
Citations 51
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The integration of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for guidance in external beam radiotherapy has faced significant research and development efforts in recent years. The current availability of linear accelerators with an embedded MRI unit, providing volumetric imaging at excellent soft tissue contrast, is expected to provide novel possibilities in the implementation of image-guided adaptive radiotherapy (IGART) protocols. This study reviews open medical physics issues in MR-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) implementation, with a focus on current approaches and on the potential for innovation in IGART.Daily imaging in MRgRT provides the ability to visualize the static anatomy, to capture internal tumor motion and to extract quantitative image features for treatment verification and monitoring. Those capabilities enable the use of treatment adaptation, with potential benefits in terms of personalized medicine. The use of online MRI requires dedicated efforts to perform accurate dose measurements and calculations, due to the presence of magnetic fields. Likewise, MRgRT requires dedicated quality assurance (QA) protocols for safe clinical implementation.Reaction to anatomical changes in MRgRT, as visualized on daily images, demands for treatment adaptation concepts, with stringent requirements in terms of fast and accurate validation before the treatment fraction can be delivered. This entails specific challenges in terms of treatment workflow optimization, QA, and verification of the expected delivered dose while the patient is in treatment position. Those challenges require specialized medical physics developments towards the aim of fully exploiting MRI capabilities. Conversely, the use of MRgRT allows for higher confidence in tumor targeting and organs-at-risk (OAR) sparing.The systematic use of MRgRT brings the possibility of leveraging IGART methods for the optimization of tumor targeting and quantitative treatment verification. Although several challenges exist, the intrinsic benefits of MRgRT will provide a deeper understanding of dose delivery effects on an individual basis, with the potential for further treatment personalization.

Citing Articles

Challenges for the Implementation of Primary Standard Dosimetry in Proton Minibeam Radiation Therapy.

Cotterill J, Flynn S, Thomas R, Subiel A, Lee N, Homer M Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(23).

PMID: 39682199 PMC: 11640736. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16234013.


Multi-institutional experience treating patients with cardiac devices on a 1.5 Tesla magnetic resonance-linear accelerator and workflow development for thoracic treatments.

Keesman R, van der Bijl E, Kerkmeijer L, Tyagi N, Akdag O, Wolthaus J Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2024; 32():100680.

PMID: 39668845 PMC: 11636337. DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100680.


Magnetic Resonance-Guided Cancer Therapy Radiomics and Machine Learning Models for Response Prediction.

Fajemisin J, Gonzalez G, Rosenberg S, Ullah G, Redler G, Latifi K Tomography. 2024; 10(9):1439-1454.

PMID: 39330753 PMC: 11435563. DOI: 10.3390/tomography10090107.


Impact of 1.5 T Magnetic Field on Treatment Plan Quality in MR-Guided Radiotherapy: Typical Phantom Test Cases.

Yan L, Xu Y, Dai J Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2024; 23:15330338241272038.

PMID: 39106410 PMC: 11307342. DOI: 10.1177/15330338241272038.


Characterization of spatial integrity with active and passive implants in a low-field magnetic resonance linear accelerator scanner.

Pouymayou B, Perez-Haas Y, Allemann F, Saguner A, Andratschke N, Guckenberger M Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2024; 30:100576.

PMID: 38644933 PMC: 11031795. DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100576.


References
1.
Maspero M, Savenije M, Dinkla A, Seevinck P, Intven M, Jurgenliemk-Schulz I . Dose evaluation of fast synthetic-CT generation using a generative adversarial network for general pelvis MR-only radiotherapy. Phys Med Biol. 2018; 63(18):185001. DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aada6d. View

2.
Barten D, Hoffmans D, Palacios M, Heukelom S, Van Battum L . Suitability of EBT3 GafChromic film for quality assurance in MR-guided radiotherapy at 0.35 T with and without real-time MR imaging. Phys Med Biol. 2018; 63(16):165014. DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aad58d. View

3.
Corradini S, Alongi F, Andratschke N, Belka C, Boldrini L, Cellini F . MR-guidance in clinical reality: current treatment challenges and future perspectives. Radiat Oncol. 2019; 14(1):92. PMC: 6551911. DOI: 10.1186/s13014-019-1308-y. View

4.
OBrien D, Roberts D, Ibbott G, Sawakuchi G . Reference dosimetry in magnetic fields: formalism and ionization chamber correction factors. Med Phys. 2016; 43(8):4915. DOI: 10.1118/1.4959785. View

5.
Malkov V, Rogers D . Sensitive volume effects on Monte Carlo calculated ion chamber response in magnetic fields. Med Phys. 2017; 44(9):4854-4858. DOI: 10.1002/mp.12421. View