» Articles » PMID: 32367896

Functional Richness of Local Hoverfly Communities (Diptera, Syrphidae) in Response to Land Use Across Temperate Europe

Overview
Journal Oikos
Date 2020 May 6
PMID 32367896
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Environmental change is not likely to act on biodiversity in a random manner, but rather according to species traits that affect assembly processes, thus, having potentially serious consequences on ecological functions. We investigated the effects of anthropogenic land use on functional richness of local hoverfly communities of 24 agricultural landscapes across temperate Europe. A multivariate ordination separated seven functional groups based on resource use, niche characteristics and response type. Intensive land use reduced functional richness, but each functional group responded in a unique way. Species richness of generalist groups was nearly unaffected. Local habitat quality mainly affected specialist groups, while land use affected intermediate groups of rather common species. We infer that high species richness within functional groups alone is no guarantee for maintaining functional richness. Thus, it is not species richness per se that improves insurance of functional diversity against environmental pressures but the degree of dissimilarity within each functional group.

Citing Articles

Hoverflies provide pollination and biological pest control in greenhouse-grown horticultural crops.

Li H, Wyckhuys K, Wu K Front Plant Sci. 2023; 14:1118388.

PMID: 37123852 PMC: 10130659. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1118388.


Green roofs and pollinators, useful green spots for some wild bee species (Hymenoptera: Anthophila), but not so much for hoverflies (Diptera: Syrphidae).

Jacobs J, Beenaerts N, Artois T Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):1449.

PMID: 36702922 PMC: 9879974. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-28698-7.


Impacts of Wildflower Interventions on Beneficial Insects in Fruit Crops: A Review.

Fountain M Insects. 2022; 13(3).

PMID: 35323602 PMC: 8955123. DOI: 10.3390/insects13030304.


Distribution of wild bee (Hymenoptera: Anthophila) and hoverfly (Diptera: Syrphidae) communities within farms undergoing ecological transition.

Noel G, Bonnet J, Everaerts S, Danel A, Calderan A, de Liedekerke A Biodivers Data J. 2021; 9:e60665.

PMID: 33519264 PMC: 7819954. DOI: 10.3897/BDJ.9.e60665.


Differences in the insect fauna associated to a monocultural pasture and a silvopasture in Southeastern Brazil.

Paiva I, Auad A, Verissimo B, Silveira L Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):12112.

PMID: 32694546 PMC: 7374564. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-68973-5.


References
1.
Balvanera P, Pfisterer A, Buchmann N, He J, Nakashizuka T, Raffaelli D . Quantifying the evidence for biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning and services. Ecol Lett. 2006; 9(10):1146-56. DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00963.x. View

2.
Sala O, Chapin 3rd F, Armesto J, Berlow E, Bloomfield J, Dirzo R . Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science. 2000; 287(5459):1770-4. DOI: 10.1126/science.287.5459.1770. View

3.
Thomas C . Dispersal and extinction in fragmented landscapes. Proc Biol Sci. 2000; 267(1439):139-45. PMC: 1690516. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2000.0978. View

4.
Petchey O, Gaston K . Extinction and the loss of functional diversity. Proc Biol Sci. 2002; 269(1501):1721-7. PMC: 1691076. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2073. View

5.
Buckley L, Roughgarden J . Biodiversity conservation: effects of changes in climate and land use. Nature. 2004; 430(6995):2 p following 33. DOI: 10.1038/nature02717. View