» Articles » PMID: 32366223

Day Centres for Older People - attender Characteristics, Access Routes and Outcomes of Regular Attendance: Findings of Exploratory Mixed Methods Case Study Research

Overview
Journal BMC Geriatr
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Geriatrics
Date 2020 May 6
PMID 32366223
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Social prescribing is encouraged to promote well-being, reduce isolation and loneliness. Traditional, generalist day centres for older people could be suggested by social prescribing, but little is known about their clientele or their outcomes. As part of a larger study of the role, outcomes and commissioning of generalist English day centres for older people, the characteristics of attenders at 4 day centres, their reasons for attendance and outcomes were explored.

Methods: This mixed-methods study used qualitative interviews and standardised tools within an embedded multiple-case study design. Semi-structured interviews with older day centre attenders (n = 23, 62% of eligible attenders) of 4 day centres in south-east England, recruited purposively to reflect organisational differences, were analysed.

Results: Participants reported non-elective withdrawal from socialisation following health or mobility decline, or losses. Apart from living arrangements and marital status, attenders' profiles differed between centres. Access had been mostly facilitated by others. Day centre attendance enhanced quality of life for this group of socially isolated people with mobility restrictions and at risk of declining independence and wellbeing. The positive impact on attenders' social participation and involvement and on meaningful occupation was significant (p-value < 0.001, 99% CI), with an average ASCOT gain score of 0.18. Ten outcome themes were identified.

Conclusion: Outcomes of day centre attendance are those targeted by social care and health policy. Centres were communities that 'enabled' and offset loss or isolation, thus supporting ageing in place through wellbeing and contributed something unique to their attenders' lives. By monitoring attenders' health and wellbeing and providing practical support, information and facilitating access to other services, centres offered added value. Attendance needs to be set in the context of other social engagement and care provision which may not overlap or duplicate centre support. Professionals may wish to explore the benefits of social prescriptions to day centres but should map local centres' provision, engage with their organisers, and seek information on attenders, who may differ from those in this study.

Citing Articles

Assessment of the Population's Willingness To Consider Elderly Daycare Centres In Saudi Arabia.

Kayal A, Angawi K, Alsaigh R, Khan H Cureus. 2025; 17(2):e78778.

PMID: 40070613 PMC: 11896573. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.78778.


Routes to social prescribing outside National Health Service (NHS) structures: a systematic map.

Hazeldine E, Westwood S, Hassannezhad M, Tierney S, Gavens L, Husk K BMJ Public Health. 2025; 3(1):e000941.

PMID: 40017949 PMC: 11816873. DOI: 10.1136/bmjph-2024-000941.


Age-Friendly Community Interventions for Health and Social Outcomes: A Scoping Review.

Hong A, Welch-Stockton J, Kim J, Canham S, Greer V, Sorweid M Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(3).

PMID: 36767920 PMC: 9915867. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20032554.


Fresh news as meaningful? A multi-site ethnographic analysis of meaningful activities at four day centres in Denmark and Norway.

Oye C Health Soc Care Community. 2022; 30(6):e4705-e4712.

PMID: 35695064 PMC: 10084292. DOI: 10.1111/hsc.13877.


Life Conditions as Mediators of Welfare State Effect on Mental Wellbeing among Oldest Old in Europe.

Cresswell-Smith J, Wahlbeck K, Kalseth J Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(7).

PMID: 35410040 PMC: 8998964. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19074363.


References
1.
Aday R, Kehoe G, Farney L . Impact of senior center friendships on aging women who live alone. J Women Aging. 2006; 18(1):57-73. DOI: 10.1300/J074v18n01_05. View

2.
Glendinning C, Clarke S, Hare P, Maddison J, Newbronner L . Progress and problems in developing outcomes-focused social care services for older people in England. Health Soc Care Community. 2008; 16(1):54-63. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2007.00724.x. View

3.
Gross B, Caiden M . The implications of aging in place for community-based services for elderly people. Care Manag J. 2000; 2(1):21-6. View

4.
Forder J, Caiels J . Measuring the outcomes of long-term care. Soc Sci Med. 2011; 73(12):1766-74. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.09.023. View

5.
Dabelko-Schoeny H, King S . In their own words: participants' perceptions of the impact of adult day services. J Gerontol Soc Work. 2010; 53(2):176-92. DOI: 10.1080/01634370903475936. View