» Articles » PMID: 32365810

Membrane Technologies in Wastewater Treatment: A Review

Overview
Date 2020 May 6
PMID 32365810
Citations 140
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In the face of water shortages, the world seeks to explore all available options in reducing the over exploitation of limited freshwater resources. One of the surest available water resources is wastewater. As the population grows, industrial, agricultural, and domestic activities increase accordingly in order to cater for the voluminous needs of man. These activities produce large volumes of wastewater from which water can be reclaimed to serve many purposes. Over the years, conventional wastewater treatment processes have succeeded to some extent in treating effluents for discharge purposes. However, improvements in wastewater treatment processes are necessary in order to make treated wastewater re-usable for industrial, agricultural, and domestic purposes. Membrane technology has emerged as a favorite choice for reclaiming water from different wastewater streams for re-use. This review looks at the trending membrane technologies in wastewater treatment, their advantages and disadvantages. It also discusses membrane fouling, membrane cleaning, and membrane modules. Finally, recommendations for future research pertaining to the application of membrane technology in wastewater treatment are made.

Citing Articles

Navigating the complex landscape of waterborne disease research.

Khant N, Lumongsod R, San A, Moon J, Namkoong S, Kim H J Water Health. 2025; 23(2):168-189.

PMID: 40018961 DOI: 10.2166/wh.2025.280.


Sustainable Bacterial Cellulose Production Using Low-Cost Fruit Wastewater Feedstocks.

Mouro C, Gomes A, Gomes A, Gouveia I Nanomaterials (Basel). 2025; 15(4).

PMID: 39997834 PMC: 11857993. DOI: 10.3390/nano15040271.


Side Chain Crosslinked Anion Exchange Membrane for Acid Concentration by Electrodialysis.

He H, Chen Q, Fu R, Liu Z, Ge L, Xu T Chem Bio Eng. 2025; 1(7):647-657.

PMID: 39974702 PMC: 11835270. DOI: 10.1021/cbe.4c00096.


A Review of Sulfate Removal from Water Using Polymeric Membranes.

Al Mehrate J, Shaban S, Henni A Membranes (Basel). 2025; 15(1).

PMID: 39852258 PMC: 11766897. DOI: 10.3390/membranes15010017.


The Role of Membranes in Modern Winemaking: From Clarification to Dealcoholization.

Oro C, Puton B, Venquiaruto L, Dallago R, Arend G, Tres M Membranes (Basel). 2025; 15(1.

PMID: 39852255 PMC: 11766575. DOI: 10.3390/membranes15010014.


References
1.
Pramanik B, Roddick F, Fan L . Combining Coagulation/MIEX with Biological Activated Carbon Treatment to Control Organic Fouling in the Microfiltration of Secondary Effluent. Membranes (Basel). 2016; 6(3). PMC: 5041030. DOI: 10.3390/membranes6030039. View

2.
Wan M, Reguyal F, Futalan C, Yang H, Kan C . Ultrasound irradiation combined with hydraulic cleaning on fouled polyethersulfone and polyvinylidene fluoride membranes. Environ Technol. 2014; 34(21-24):2929-37. DOI: 10.1080/09593330.2012.701235. View

3.
Mo H, Ng H . An experimental study on the effect of spacer on concentration polarization in a long channel reverse osmosis membrane cell. Water Sci Technol. 2010; 61(8):2035-41. DOI: 10.2166/wst.2010.116. View

4.
Zhang S, Wang P, Fu X, Chung T . Sustainable water recovery from oily wastewater via forward osmosis-membrane distillation (FO-MD). Water Res. 2014; 52:112-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2013.12.044. View

5.
Rodriguez-Mozaz S, Ricart M, Kock-Schulmeyer M, Guasch H, Bonnineau C, Proia L . Pharmaceuticals and pesticides in reclaimed water: Efficiency assessment of a microfiltration-reverse osmosis (MF-RO) pilot plant. J Hazard Mater. 2014; 282:165-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.09.015. View