» Articles » PMID: 32365573

Can We Accurately Measure Axial Segment Coordination During Turning Using Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs)?

Overview
Journal Sensors (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2020 May 6
PMID 32365573
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Camera-based 3D motion analysis systems are considered to be the gold standard for movement analysis. However, using such equipment in a clinical setting is prohibitive due to the expense and time-consuming nature of data collection and analysis. Therefore, Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs) have been suggested as an alternative to measure movement in clinical settings. One area which is both important and challenging is the assessment of turning kinematics in individuals with movement disorders. This study aimed to validate the use of IMUs in the measurement of turning kinematics in healthy adults compared to a camera-based 3D motion analysis system. Data were collected from twelve participants using a Vicon motion analysis system which were compared with data from four IMUs placed on the forehead, middle thorax, and feet in order to determine accuracy and reliability. The results demonstrated that the IMU sensors produced reliable kinematic measures and showed excellent reliability (ICCs 0.80-0.98) and no significant differences were seen in paired -tests in all parameters when comparing the two systems. This suggests that the IMU sensors provide a viable alternative to camera-based motion capture that could be used in isolation to gather data from individuals with movement disorders in clinical settings and real-life situations.

Citing Articles

Turning speed as a more responsive metric of age-related decline in mobility: A comparative study with gait speed.

Weston A, Lohse K, Kittelson A, King L, Carlson-Kuhta P, Dibble L Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2024; 113:106196.

PMID: 38354515 PMC: 10955671. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2024.106196.


An investigation of the contribution of different turn speeds during standing turns in individuals with and without Parkinson's disease.

Khobkhun F, Pereira Santiago P, Tahara A, Srivanitchapoom P, Richards J Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):22566.

PMID: 36581700 PMC: 9800358. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-27217-4.


Superior Gait Symmetry and Postural Stability among Yoga Instructors-Inertial Measurement Unit-Based Evaluation.

Lin A, Lin T, Tan Y, Pan W, Shih C, Lee C Sensors (Basel). 2022; 22(24).

PMID: 36560050 PMC: 9781467. DOI: 10.3390/s22249683.


Randomized Controlled Trial of Robot-Assisted Gait Training versus Therapist-Assisted Treadmill Gait Training as Add-on Therapy in Early Subacute Stroke Patients: The GAITFAST Study Protocol.

Kolarova B, Sanak D, Hlustik P, Kolar P Brain Sci. 2022; 12(12).

PMID: 36552120 PMC: 9775673. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci12121661.


Head and Trunk Kinematics during Activities of Daily Living with and without Mechanical Restriction of Cervical Motion.

Weston A, Loyd B, Taylor C, Hoppes C, Dibble L Sensors (Basel). 2022; 22(8).

PMID: 35459056 PMC: 9026113. DOI: 10.3390/s22083071.


References
1.
Picerno P, Cereatti A, Cappozzo A . Joint kinematics estimate using wearable inertial and magnetic sensing modules. Gait Posture. 2008; 28(4):588-95. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.04.003. View

2.
Spildooren J, Vercruysse S, Heremans E, Galna B, Vandenbossche J, Desloovere K . Head-pelvis coupling is increased during turning in patients with Parkinson's disease and freezing of gait. Mov Disord. 2013; 28(5):619-25. DOI: 10.1002/mds.25285. View

3.
Bland J, Altman D . Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res. 1999; 8(2):135-60. DOI: 10.1177/096228029900800204. View

4.
Barrois R, Ricard D, Oudre L, Tlili L, Provost C, Vienne A . Observational Study of 180° Turning Strategies Using Inertial Measurement Units and Fall Risk in Poststroke Hemiparetic Patients. Front Neurol. 2017; 8:194. PMC: 5431013. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2017.00194. View

5.
Morris M, Huxham F, McGinley J, Dodd K, Iansek R . The biomechanics and motor control of gait in Parkinson disease. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2001; 16(6):459-70. DOI: 10.1016/s0268-0033(01)00035-3. View